EBK INTERMEDIATE MICROECONOMICS AND ITS
12th Edition
ISBN: 9781305176386
Author: Snyder
Publisher: YUZU
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 5.4, Problem 1MQ
To determine
To show: The A’s expected payoff equals to zero is to be verified by using the formula for expected values and the pure strategy of heads.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
If Rowena mixes 50-50 between her two strategies, what is Colin's expected payoff
from playing M with probability 1/5 and N with probability 4/5? (round to the second
nearest decimal if necessary)
COLIN
N.
Up
1,1
2, 2
3,4
9, 3
ROWENA
Down
2,5
3.3
1.2
7.1
Professor can give a TA scholarship for a maximum of 2 years. At the beginning of each year professor Hahn decides whether he will give a scholarship to Gong Yi or not. Gong Yi can get a scholarship in t=2, only if he gets it in t=1. Basically, the professor and TA will play the following game twice. TA can be a Hardworking type with probably 0.3 and can be a Lazy type with a probability of 0.7. Professor does not know TA's type. If TA is hard working, it will be X=5 and TA will always work if he gets a scholarship. If TA is lazy, it will be X= 1. There is no time discount for t=2. Find out a Perfect Bayesian Equilibrium of the game.
A Bank has foreclosed on a home mortgage and is selling the house at auction. There are two bidders for the house, Zeke and Heidi. The bank does not know the willingness to pay of these three bidders for the house, but on the basis of its previous experience, the bank believes that each of these bidders has a probability of 1/3 of valuing it at $800,000, a probability of 1/3 of valuing at $600,000, and a probability of 1/3 of valuing it at $300,000. The bank believes that these probabilities are independent among buyers. If the bank sells the house by means of a second- bidder, sealed-bid auction, what will be the bank’s expected revenue from the sale? The answer is 455, 556. Please show the steps in details thank you!
Chapter 5 Solutions
EBK INTERMEDIATE MICROECONOMICS AND ITS
Ch. 5.3 - Prob. 1TTACh. 5.3 - Prob. 2TTACh. 5.4 - Prob. 1MQCh. 5.4 - Prob. 2MQCh. 5.4 - Prob. 3MQCh. 5.4 - Prob. 4MQCh. 5.5 - Prob. 1TTACh. 5.5 - Prob. 2TTACh. 5.5 - Prob. 1MQCh. 5.5 - Prob. 2MQ
Ch. 5.6 - Prob. 1TTACh. 5.6 - Prob. 2TTACh. 5.6 - Prob. 1MQCh. 5.6 - Prob. 2MQCh. 5.6 - Prob. 1.1TTACh. 5.6 - Prob. 1.2TTACh. 5.6 - Prob. 1.1MQCh. 5.6 - Prob. 1.2MQCh. 5.9 - Prob. 1MQCh. 5.9 - Prob. 2MQCh. 5.9 - Prob. 1TTACh. 5.9 - Prob. 2TTACh. 5 - Prob. 1RQCh. 5 - Prob. 2RQCh. 5 - Prob. 3RQCh. 5 - Prob. 4RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5RQCh. 5 - Prob. 6RQCh. 5 - Prob. 7RQCh. 5 - Prob. 8RQCh. 5 - Prob. 9RQCh. 5 - Prob. 10RQCh. 5 - Prob. 5.1PCh. 5 - Prob. 5.2PCh. 5 - Prob. 5.3PCh. 5 - Prob. 5.5PCh. 5 - Prob. 5.6PCh. 5 - Prob. 5.7PCh. 5 - Prob. 5.8PCh. 5 - Prob. 5.9PCh. 5 - Prob. 5.10P
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Phil, Stu, and Doug are deciding which fraternity to pledge. They all assign a payoff of 5 to pledging Phi Gamma and a payoff of 4 to Delta Chi. The payoff from not pledging either house is 1. Phi Gamma and Delta Chi each have two slots. If all three of them happen to choose the same house, then the house will randomly choose which two are admitted. In that case, each has probability 2/3 of getting in and probability 1/3 of not pledging any house. If they do not all choose the same house, then all are admitted to the house they chose. Find a symmetric Nash equilibrium in mixed strategies.arrow_forwardThe deciding shot in a soccer game comes down to a penalty shot. If the goal-keeper jumps in one corner and the player shots the ball in the other, then it is a goal. If the goalie jumps left and the player shoots left, then it is a goal with probability 1/3. If the goalie jumps right and the player shots right, it is goal with probability 2/3. If both players play Nash strategies, what is the expected value of goals that will follow from this penalty shot. 1/9 2/9 3/9 4/9 5/9 6/9 O7/9arrow_forwardWith what probability does player 1 play Down in the mixed strategy Nash equilibrium? (Input your answer as a decimal to the nearest hundredth, for example: 0.14, 0.56, or 0.87). PLAYER 1 Up Down PLAYER 2 Left 97,95 47, 33 Right 8,43 68,91arrow_forward
- 4. You have probably had the experience of trying to avoid encountering someone, whom we will call Rocky. In this instance, Rocky is trying to find you. It is Saturday night and you are choosing which of two possible parties to attend. You like Party 1 better and, if Rocky goes to the other party, you get a payoff 20 at Party 1. If Rocky attends Party 1, however, you are going to be uncomfortable and get a payoff of 5. Similarly, Party 2 gives you a payoff of 15, unless Rocky attends, in which case the payoff is 0. Rocky likes Party 2 better, but he is likes you. He values Party 2 at 10, Party 1 at 5, and your presence at either party that he attends is worth an additional payoff of 10. You and Rocky both know each others strategy space (which party to attend) and payoffs functions.arrow_forwardConsider a game where there is a $2,520 prize if a player correctly guesses the outcome of a fair 7-sided die roll.Cindy will only play this game if there is a nonnegative expected value, even with the risk of losing the payment amount.What is the most Cindy would be willing to pay?arrow_forwardHere is a Bayesian BOS game. Man has a special preference t1 on boxing while woman has a special preference t2 on opera. Both are in [0,2]. The preference information is private. i.e. Each knows his (her) own preference but does not know the other's preference. The below is the payoff. M/W Boxing Opera Воxing 3+t1,1 0,0 Opera 0,0 1,3+t2 We are checking whether the below strategy profile is a Bayesian Nash Equilibrium. "Man chooses boxing if t1>p while woman chooses opera if t2>g." 1) Given t1, man will choose boxing if t1> /g- 2) Given t2, woman will choose opera if t2> /p- 4) By shoving the simultaneous equations, we get p=q=sqrt(6)-arrow_forward
- Suppose there are two players playing a game with east or west and south and nerth ways. Find the expected Nash equilibrium by using the concept of probabilities. Player X Left[L) Right|R) Player Y Up(U) (5,6) (0,8) (4,6) Down[D) (0,9)arrow_forwardBill owes Bob $36. Just before Bill pays him the money, he gives Bob the opportunity to play a dice game to potentially win more money. The rules of this game are as follows: If Bob rolls doubles (probability 1/6), Bill will Bob double ($72). If he misses doubles on pay the first try, he can try again or settle for half the money ($18). If he makes doubles on the second try Bill will again pay-up double ($72), but if Bob misses doubles on the second try Bill will only pay him one-third ($12). Should Bob decide to play the dice game with Bill, or insist that he pay the $36 now? Use a decision tree to support your answer.arrow_forwardConsider a game with two players (Alice and Bob) and payoffffs Bob Bob s1 s2 Alice, s1 3, 3 0, 0 Alice, s2 0, 0 2, 2 In the equilibrium in the above game, Alice should (A) always choose the fifirst strategy s1; (B) choose the fifirst strategy s1 with probability 40% ; (C) choose the fifirst strategy s1 with probability 50% ; (D) choose the fifirst strategy s1 with probability 60% .arrow_forward
- Boris and Angela are negotiating a new trade deal, which resembles a modified centipede game. When it is their turn, each of them decides whether to cooperate (C) or to decline (D). Unfortunately, Angela is not sure how much time Boris has for the negotiations before he needs to leave to talk to Emmanuel. With probability p = 4/5, Boris will stay and insist on making the final proposal (long game, L). With probability 1 − p = 1/5, Boris will have to rush off, so that the game ends after Angela’s move (short game, S). Boris has perfect knowledge of his schedule. The structure and payoffs are represented in the game tree below (Attached picture). (a) Specify the set of possible histories H of the game. Underline terminal histories.(b) Specify the set of possible strategies for Boris and Angela.(c) How many subgames does this game have? Indicate all subgames in this gamearrow_forwardGame Theory Consider the entry game with incomplete information studied in class. An incumbent politician's cost of campaigning can be high or low and the entrant does not know this cost (but the incumbent does). In class, we found two pure-strategy Bayesian Nash Equilibria in this game. Assume that the probability that the cost of campaigning is high is a parameter p, 0 < p < 1. Show that when p is large enough, there is only one pure-strategy Bayesian Nash Equilibrium. What is it? What is the intuition? How large does p have to be? Note:- Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism. Answer completely. You will get up vote for sure.arrow_forwardIn a mixed strategy equilibrium of the game below, what is the probability with which Player 2 chooses r (if there are multiple equilibria with different probabilities of a, choose any one)? Player 2 y a 3, 3 4, 2 Player 1 b 6,3 2, 6 5. 3 3, 2 Numerical answerarrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning