utilization of employees. Concept introduction : The M/M/1 queue assumes poisonarrivals, exponential service times, and a single server serving customers in a FCFS fashion. Poisson arrivals are a reasonably good assumption for unscheduled systems. Further if there is a mix of many different types of jobs the exponential distribution can be realistic for service times. Otherwise it tends to be too variable of a distribution.

Question

Want to see the full answer?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 7.5, Problem 24P

a)

Summary Introduction

Interpretation: utilization of employees.

Concept introduction: The M/M/1 queue assumes poisonarrivals, exponential service times, and a single server serving customers in a FCFS fashion. Poisson arrivals are a reasonably good assumption for unscheduled systems. Further if there is a mix of many different types of jobs the exponential distribution can be realistic for service times. Otherwise it tends to be too variable of a distribution.

b)

Summary Introduction

interpretation: the average time an email spends waiting before an employee starts working on it.

concept introduction:The M/M/1 queue assumes poison arrivals, exponential service times, and a single server serving customers in a FCFS fashion. Poisson arrivals are a reasonably good assumption for unscheduled systems. Further if there is a mix of many different types of jobs the exponential distribution can be realistic for service times. Otherwise it tends to be too variable of a distribution.

c)

Summary Introduction

Interpretation:average number of emails in the system waiting to be worked on.

Concept introduction: The M/M/1 queue assumes poison arrivals, exponential service times, and a single server serving customers in a FCFS fashion. Poisson arrivals are a reasonably good assumption for unscheduled systems. Further if there is a mix of many different types of jobs the exponential distribution can be realistic for service times. Otherwise it tends to be too variable of a distribution.

D)

Summary Introduction

Interpretation:options available to decrease customers waiting.

Concept introduction:The M/M/1 queue assumes poison arrivals, exponential service times, and a single server serving customers in a FCFS fashion. Poisson arrivals are a reasonably good assumption for unscheduled systems. Further if there is a mix of many different types of jobs the exponential distribution can be realistic for service times. Otherwise it tends to be too variable of a distribution.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Students have asked these similar questions

Customers send emails to a help desk that has three employees who answer theemails (and this is their only responsibility). Customer requests arrive accordingto a Poisson process with a rate of 30 per hour. It takes on average 4 minutes towrite a response email; the standard deviation of this service times is 2 minutes.b. What is the average time an email spends waiting before an employee startsworking on it? What is the average time to complete the emails requests (fromthe time the email is sent to when it is answered)?

YourNurse (YN) Inc. uses certified nurses to answer medical queries from customersover the phone. When patients call into YN, they are first asked to provide their zipcode, which then allows YN to route their call to the call center nearest to the patient(it operates 10 across the country). Which single suggestion in the following list (andexplanation) is most likely to reduce the average time callers wait before speaking witha nurse?a. Run an advertising campaign to increase demand and to better utilize its nurses.b. Train its nurses so that they spend more time answering the patients’ questions.c. Instead of using callers’ zip codes, route calls to the call center with the fewest callersto help prevent situations in which there are idle nurses at the same time that there arecallers on hold.d. Play a recording of useful medical information while callers are on hold so as todecrease their perception of how long they are waiting.e. None of the above

Proctoring Enabled: Chapter 11 Queuing Models Ex. Saved Help Save & Exit Submit 1 In an M/MA queueing system, the arrival rate is 3 customers per hour and the service rate is 5 customers per hour. If the service process is automated (resulting in no variation in service times but the same service rate), what will be the resulting performance measurements? (Round your answers to 3 decimal places.) a. What is the utilization? Utilization b. What is the expected number of customers in the system (L)? Number of customers c. What is the expected waiting time (in hours) for the system (W? Waiting time(in hours) Mc Graw Hill Prev 1 of 5 Next > ASUS

Answer 2

Question

Chapter 7.5, Problem 24P

a)

Summary Introduction

Interpretation: utilization of employees.

Concept introduction: The M/M/1 queue assumes poisonarrivals, exponential service times, and a single server serving customers in a FCFS fashion. Poisson arrivals are a reasonably good assumption for unscheduled systems. Further if there is a mix of many different types of jobs the exponential distribution can be realistic for service times. Otherwise it tends to be too variable of a distribution.

b)

Summary Introduction

interpretation: the average time an email spends waiting before an employee starts working on it.

concept introduction:The M/M/1 queue assumes poison arrivals, exponential service times, and a single server serving customers in a FCFS fashion. Poisson arrivals are a reasonably good assumption for unscheduled systems. Further if there is a mix of many different types of jobs the exponential distribution can be realistic for service times. Otherwise it tends to be too variable of a distribution.

c)

Summary Introduction

Interpretation:average number of emails in the system waiting to be worked on.

Concept introduction: The M/M/1 queue assumes poison arrivals, exponential service times, and a single server serving customers in a FCFS fashion. Poisson arrivals are a reasonably good assumption for unscheduled systems. Further if there is a mix of many different types of jobs the exponential distribution can be realistic for service times. Otherwise it tends to be too variable of a distribution.

D)

Summary Introduction

Interpretation:options available to decrease customers waiting.

Concept introduction:The M/M/1 queue assumes poison arrivals, exponential service times, and a single server serving customers in a FCFS fashion. Poisson arrivals are a reasonably good assumption for unscheduled systems. Further if there is a mix of many different types of jobs the exponential distribution can be realistic for service times. Otherwise it tends to be too variable of a distribution.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Answer 3

Question

Chapter 7.5, Problem 24P

a)

Summary Introduction

Interpretation: utilization of employees.

Concept introduction: The M/M/1 queue assumes poisonarrivals, exponential service times, and a single server serving customers in a FCFS fashion. Poisson arrivals are a reasonably good assumption for unscheduled systems. Further if there is a mix of many different types of jobs the exponential distribution can be realistic for service times. Otherwise it tends to be too variable of a distribution.

b)

Summary Introduction

interpretation: the average time an email spends waiting before an employee starts working on it.

concept introduction:The M/M/1 queue assumes poison arrivals, exponential service times, and a single server serving customers in a FCFS fashion. Poisson arrivals are a reasonably good assumption for unscheduled systems. Further if there is a mix of many different types of jobs the exponential distribution can be realistic for service times. Otherwise it tends to be too variable of a distribution.

c)

Summary Introduction

Interpretation:average number of emails in the system waiting to be worked on.

Concept introduction: The M/M/1 queue assumes poison arrivals, exponential service times, and a single server serving customers in a FCFS fashion. Poisson arrivals are a reasonably good assumption for unscheduled systems. Further if there is a mix of many different types of jobs the exponential distribution can be realistic for service times. Otherwise it tends to be too variable of a distribution.

D)

Summary Introduction

Interpretation:options available to decrease customers waiting.

Concept introduction:The M/M/1 queue assumes poison arrivals, exponential service times, and a single server serving customers in a FCFS fashion. Poisson arrivals are a reasonably good assumption for unscheduled systems. Further if there is a mix of many different types of jobs the exponential distribution can be realistic for service times. Otherwise it tends to be too variable of a distribution.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Answer 4

Question

Chapter 7.5, Problem 24P

a)

Summary Introduction

Interpretation: utilization of employees.

Concept introduction: The M/M/1 queue assumes poisonarrivals, exponential service times, and a single server serving customers in a FCFS fashion. Poisson arrivals are a reasonably good assumption for unscheduled systems. Further if there is a mix of many different types of jobs the exponential distribution can be realistic for service times. Otherwise it tends to be too variable of a distribution.

b)

Summary Introduction

interpretation: the average time an email spends waiting before an employee starts working on it.

concept introduction:The M/M/1 queue assumes poison arrivals, exponential service times, and a single server serving customers in a FCFS fashion. Poisson arrivals are a reasonably good assumption for unscheduled systems. Further if there is a mix of many different types of jobs the exponential distribution can be realistic for service times. Otherwise it tends to be too variable of a distribution.

c)

Summary Introduction

Interpretation:average number of emails in the system waiting to be worked on.

Concept introduction: The M/M/1 queue assumes poison arrivals, exponential service times, and a single server serving customers in a FCFS fashion. Poisson arrivals are a reasonably good assumption for unscheduled systems. Further if there is a mix of many different types of jobs the exponential distribution can be realistic for service times. Otherwise it tends to be too variable of a distribution.

D)

Summary Introduction

Interpretation:options available to decrease customers waiting.

Concept introduction:The M/M/1 queue assumes poison arrivals, exponential service times, and a single server serving customers in a FCFS fashion. Poisson arrivals are a reasonably good assumption for unscheduled systems. Further if there is a mix of many different types of jobs the exponential distribution can be realistic for service times. Otherwise it tends to be too variable of a distribution.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Answer 5

Chapter 7.5, Problem 24P

a)

Summary Introduction

Interpretation: utilization of employees.

Concept introduction: The M/M/1 queue assumes poisonarrivals, exponential service times, and a single server serving customers in a FCFS fashion. Poisson arrivals are a reasonably good assumption for unscheduled systems. Further if there is a mix of many different types of jobs the exponential distribution can be realistic for service times. Otherwise it tends to be too variable of a distribution.

b)

Summary Introduction

interpretation: the average time an email spends waiting before an employee starts working on it.

concept introduction:The M/M/1 queue assumes poison arrivals, exponential service times, and a single server serving customers in a FCFS fashion. Poisson arrivals are a reasonably good assumption for unscheduled systems. Further if there is a mix of many different types of jobs the exponential distribution can be realistic for service times. Otherwise it tends to be too variable of a distribution.

c)

Summary Introduction

Interpretation:average number of emails in the system waiting to be worked on.

Concept introduction: The M/M/1 queue assumes poison arrivals, exponential service times, and a single server serving customers in a FCFS fashion. Poisson arrivals are a reasonably good assumption for unscheduled systems. Further if there is a mix of many different types of jobs the exponential distribution can be realistic for service times. Otherwise it tends to be too variable of a distribution.

D)

Summary Introduction

Interpretation:options available to decrease customers waiting.

Concept introduction:The M/M/1 queue assumes poison arrivals, exponential service times, and a single server serving customers in a FCFS fashion. Poisson arrivals are a reasonably good assumption for unscheduled systems. Further if there is a mix of many different types of jobs the exponential distribution can be realistic for service times. Otherwise it tends to be too variable of a distribution.

Answer 6

Chapter 7.5, Problem 24P

a)

Summary Introduction

Interpretation: utilization of employees.

Concept introduction: The M/M/1 queue assumes poisonarrivals, exponential service times, and a single server serving customers in a FCFS fashion. Poisson arrivals are a reasonably good assumption for unscheduled systems. Further if there is a mix of many different types of jobs the exponential distribution can be realistic for service times. Otherwise it tends to be too variable of a distribution.

Answer 7

Chapter 7.5, Problem 24P

a)

Summary Introduction

Interpretation: utilization of employees.

Concept introduction: The M/M/1 queue assumes poisonarrivals, exponential service times, and a single server serving customers in a FCFS fashion. Poisson arrivals are a reasonably good assumption for unscheduled systems. Further if there is a mix of many different types of jobs the exponential distribution can be realistic for service times. Otherwise it tends to be too variable of a distribution.

Answer 8

b)

Summary Introduction

interpretation: the average time an email spends waiting before an employee starts working on it.

concept introduction:The M/M/1 queue assumes poison arrivals, exponential service times, and a single server serving customers in a FCFS fashion. Poisson arrivals are a reasonably good assumption for unscheduled systems. Further if there is a mix of many different types of jobs the exponential distribution can be realistic for service times. Otherwise it tends to be too variable of a distribution.

Answer 9

b)

Summary Introduction

interpretation: the average time an email spends waiting before an employee starts working on it.

concept introduction:The M/M/1 queue assumes poison arrivals, exponential service times, and a single server serving customers in a FCFS fashion. Poisson arrivals are a reasonably good assumption for unscheduled systems. Further if there is a mix of many different types of jobs the exponential distribution can be realistic for service times. Otherwise it tends to be too variable of a distribution.

Answer 10

c)

Summary Introduction

Interpretation:average number of emails in the system waiting to be worked on.

Concept introduction: The M/M/1 queue assumes poison arrivals, exponential service times, and a single server serving customers in a FCFS fashion. Poisson arrivals are a reasonably good assumption for unscheduled systems. Further if there is a mix of many different types of jobs the exponential distribution can be realistic for service times. Otherwise it tends to be too variable of a distribution.

Answer 11

c)

Summary Introduction

Interpretation:average number of emails in the system waiting to be worked on.

Concept introduction: The M/M/1 queue assumes poison arrivals, exponential service times, and a single server serving customers in a FCFS fashion. Poisson arrivals are a reasonably good assumption for unscheduled systems. Further if there is a mix of many different types of jobs the exponential distribution can be realistic for service times. Otherwise it tends to be too variable of a distribution.

Answer 12

D)

Summary Introduction

Interpretation:options available to decrease customers waiting.

Concept introduction:The M/M/1 queue assumes poison arrivals, exponential service times, and a single server serving customers in a FCFS fashion. Poisson arrivals are a reasonably good assumption for unscheduled systems. Further if there is a mix of many different types of jobs the exponential distribution can be realistic for service times. Otherwise it tends to be too variable of a distribution.

Answer 13

D)

Summary Introduction

Interpretation:options available to decrease customers waiting.

Concept introduction:The M/M/1 queue assumes poison arrivals, exponential service times, and a single server serving customers in a FCFS fashion. Poisson arrivals are a reasonably good assumption for unscheduled systems. Further if there is a mix of many different types of jobs the exponential distribution can be realistic for service times. Otherwise it tends to be too variable of a distribution.

Answer 14

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 15

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 16

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Answer 17

Ch. 7.1 - Prob. 1P Ch. 7.1 - Prob. 2P Ch. 7.1 - Prob. 3P Ch. 7.1 - Prob. 4P Ch. 7.1 - Prob. 5P Ch. 7.1 - Prob. 6P Ch. 7.1 - Prob. 7P Ch. 7.2 - Prob. 8P Ch. 7.2 - Prob. 9P Ch. 7.2 - Prob. 10P

Solution Summary: The author explains that the M/M/1 queue assumes poison arrivals, exponential service times, and a single server serving customers in an FCFS fashion.

Concept explainers

Want to see the full answer?

Chapter 7 Solutions