Question 2:Consider two players, A and B, each of which can choose action X or Y. Their payoffs arerepresented in the following matrix, where K is a constant.Player AXYXA: 15B: 12A: 20B: 30Player BYA: 18B: 24A: 18 + KB: 22Q2 a) First assume that K > 0. Does either player have a dominant strategy? If so, explainwhat it is and why.Q2 b) Again assuming that K > 0, explain with appropriate discussion what is the Nashequilibrium of this game.Q2 c) Now assume that K<0. Do players have dominant strategies and what is the Nashequilibrium in this case? Does your answer depend on the specific (negative) value of K?Explain the reason behind the differences between the results in point c) and those in pointsa) and b).

Answered: Image /qna-images/answer/0eec8c02-d9a6-4c18-bd76-d8ab688db3af.jpg

Consider two players, A and B, each of which can choose action X or Y. Their payoffs are represented in the following matrix, where K is a constant. Player A X Y X A: 15 B: 12 A: 20 B: 30 Player B Y A: 18 B: 24 A: 18 + K B: 22 Q2 a) First assume that K > 0. Does either player have a dominant strategy? If so, explain what it is and why.

Consider two players, A and B, each of which can choose action X or Y. Their payoffs are represented in the following matrix, where K is a constant. Player A X Y X A: 15 B: 12 A: 20 B: 30 Player B Y A: 18 B: 24 A: 18 + K B: 22 Q2 a) First assume that K > 0. Does either player have a dominant strategy? If so, explain what it is and why.

Microeconomic Theory

12th Edition

ISBN:9781337517942

Author:NICHOLSON

Publisher:NICHOLSON

Chapter8: Game Theory

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 8.7P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

es Use the following payoff matrix for a simultaneous-move one-shot game to answer the accompanying questions. C 23, 5 27, 5 a. What is player 1's optimal strategy? Player 1 Strategy O Strategy B O Player 1 does not have an optimal strategy. Strategy A b. Determine player T's equilibrium payoff. 21 D 10, 16 4,9 Player 2 E 18, 18
Consider the following game: Player 2 In Out Player 1 In -2,-2 2, 0 Out 0, 2 0, 0 (a) What is the Nash equilibrium of this game, or what are the Nash equilibriaof this game? (b) Does either firm have a dominate strategy (a strategy that is always abest response)? Which? (c) Suppose Player 1 could move before Player 2 and Player 2 could observe Player 1’s move. What do you think would happen?
The following table contains the possible actions and payoffs of players 1 and 2. Player 1 U M D L 2,10 2,5 8,7 Player 2 C 5,2 11,8 8,4 R 5,4 2,9 8,3 This is a simultaneous move game. In a pure strategy Nash equilibrium of this game, Player 1 receives a payoff of ✓and player 2 receives a payoff of If, instead of playing simultaneously, player 2 moves first, then in the Nash equilibrium player 1 receives a payoff of ✓and player 2 receives a payoff of
2. Consider the following 2 → 2 normal form games: In both games Player 1 (the row player) chooses either strategy A or strategy B. Player 2 (the column player) chooses simultaneously strategy A or B. The outcomes are defined by the following matrices. The first number in each cell indicates the payoff of Player 1, the second number (after the comma) indicates the payoff of Player 2. A B Game I A B 50X, 30X 10X, 10X 10X, 10X 30X, 50X Game II A A 110X, 30X B 10X, 10X B 10X, 10X 30X, 50X where X > 0 is a payoff scale parameter. (a) For both games: find all Nash equilibria in pure strategies, if any, and find the Nash equilibrium in mixed strategies. How would you describe this strategic interaction in the two games?
Keith and Blake play a simultaneous one-shot game given by the following table: Blake Left Right Keith Top Bottom 4.00, -5.00 0.00, -6.00 5.00, 0.00 -2.00, 7.00 As there is no unique pure strategy Nash equilibrium, assume that each player plays each of his choices half of the time. What is the average payoff for Keith? | What is the average payoff for Blake? (Round to two decimals if necessary.) (Round to two decimals if necessary.)
2- Consider the following game. Player 2 Player 1 U 12, 2 | 3, 9 5, 8 4, 2 D (a) Find all the Nash equilibria, pure and mixed. (b) Suppose that the payoff of the column player u:(D, L) is reduced from 8 to 6, but all other payoffs remain the same. Again, find all the pure- and mixed-strategy Nash equilibria. (c) Compare the mixed-strategy equilibria in parts (a) and (b). Did this worsening in one of player 2's payoffs change player 2's equilibrium mixed strategy? Did it change player l's? Give some intuition.
Consider the payoff matrix for a game depicted below. Player 1 selects the row and Player 2 selects the column. Up Down Left 1, -1 -1, 1 Right -1, 1 1, -1 What is (are) the Nash equilibrium (equilibria)? Question 18Answer a. Player 1 plays right; Player 2 plays down b. Player 1 plays left; Player 2 plays down c. Player 1 plays down; Player 2 plays left d. Player 1 plays right; Player 2 plays up e. Player 1 plays up; Player 2 plays left f. There is no Nash equilibrium g. Player 1 plays down; Player 2 plays right h. Player 1 plays up; Player 2 plays right i. Player 1 plays left; Player 2 plays up
Keith and Blake play a simultaneous one-shot game given by the following table: Blake Left Right Тop 5.00. -5.00 0.00, -6.00 Kelth Bottom 6.00,0.co -2.00, 8.00 As there is no unique pure strategy Nash equilibrium, assume that each player plays each of his chcices half of the time. What is the average payoff for Keith? (Round to two decimals if necessary.) What is the aver age payoff for Blake? |(Round to two decimals if necessary)
Consider the following game : Stag Rabbit Stag 9, 9 0, 8 Rabbit 8, 0 7, 7 The first payoff is that of player 1 and the second that of player 2. a. ) Draw the extensive form of the simultaneous game. Find all the Nash equilibrium. p. Suppose player 1 moves first or we are in a sequential game now. Draw the extensive form in the sequential version. c. What is the subgame perfect Nash Equilibrium (SPNE) in the sequential version? d. ) Explain why it is an SPNE.
Consider the following simultaneous game: Player 1 U D Player 2 L 20,-10 -10, 20 R -10, 20 20,-10 Please indicate whether each of the following statements is true or false. Player 1 has a dominant strategy. This game has a Nash equilibrium. This game has a Nash equilibrium in pure strategies. Player 1's best response is D if player 2 plays R.
2. Consider the following game. Two criminals are thinking about pulling off a bank robbery. The take from the bank would be $20,000 each, but the job requires two people (one to rob the bank and one to drive the getaway car. Each criminal could instead rob a liquor store. The take from robing a liquor store is only $1000 but can be done with one person acting alone. Write the payoff matrix of this game Player A Bank job Liqour store Player B Bank job Liquor store a. What are the Nash equilibria in this game? b. Explain why there can be multiple equilibria in this game. c. How the game will be played if mixed strategies are allowed? Discuss.
Help me