preview

Hsun Tu Man's Nature Is Evil

Decent Essays

Many people today recognize Hsun Tsu as one of the most important philosophers in Confucianism while some view him as the guy who merely disagreed with Mencius particularly when it came to the nature of man. Mencius believed that human nature is in essence, good however, Hsun Tsu believed that men are inherently evil. Despite how worthy man may seem, he must surround himself with genuine individuals, seek out an exemplary teacher and oblige by their rules in order to be transformed. Although it is apparent that Hsun Tzu’s teachings precisely differed from his superior’s, they ultimately had a positive impact on the development of Chinese Philosophy and were eventually published as parables and titled, “Man’s Nature is Evil.”
In Tzu’s writings of, “Man’s Nature is Evil,” he starts off by explaining his reasoning for why he supports his key …show more content…

He believes that man lack the ability to distinguish right from wrong which puts them at risk, eternally, for winding up corrupt, violent, and dishonorable. With that being said, any degree of goodness that may stem from man is in response to conscious activity. When it comes to conscious activity and nature, Tzu disagrees with Mencius and his belief that, because the nature of man is good, he therefore has the ability to learn. Tzu claims that conscious activity could be learned and acquired only through skill and experience. This consequently differs from his definition of nature, which he explains as being that of which is given to us by heaven and is something that we cannot change or learn. Hsun Tzu also challenges Mencius’s theory by expressing that if man is naturally good, there would have been no fundamental use for sage-kings, or men who are continually attempting to better themself. He states that a man

Get Access