Buddhism And Confucianism Essay

(4, 6, 7) Particularly during its largest period of influence (The Era of Division), they largely welcomed Buddhism, as it offered a type of refuge from the turmoil and war of that time period (ADD EV). Buddhism was very flexible, and as Zong Mi pointed out, was fairly flexible to the needs of the individual worshipper (Document 6). It disregarded previous social structures, and accepted people regardless of social status or education, as displayed in the records of Buddhist teachings transcribed by disciples (Document 4). Though, documents such as this one aren’t fully credible, as the events written about are transcribed by loyal, and heavily biased, disciples (SOURCE). But, around the 840s, the government’s view on Buddhism began to shift. Many confucian administrators claimed that the lack of taxes on the religion caused an economic deficit, feeding state fears and leading to restrictions, and later the open persecution of the religion by Emperor Wuzong (Doc 7). Monasteries either heavily taxed or destroyed, monks/nuns were forced to renounce their religion, and previously Buddhist lands were parceled out to landlords. (ADD EV). So despite the inclusiveness and flexibility of the religion with peasants, the ultimate persecution of worshippers affected buddhist members of the Chinese peasant class

The response to the spread of Buddhism in China differed according to one’s social position.

Around 845 CE, Tang Emperor Wu states that the spread of the religion wore “out people’s strength” and “pilfers their wealth” (Document 6). The stealing of their wealth is an act of opposing the public policygoing against the rules that were made by the government, while the wearing out strength represented his impression of Buddhism. Emperor Wu did not approve Buddhism because he believed that the religion was corrupting his citizens since they were abandoning the those above them. As a result, he stated that the “evil” should be eradicated (Document 6). In 819 CE, Han Yun, a Confucian scholar at the Tang imperial court, called Buddhism a “cult of barbarian peoples.” He goes on to address that considering how Buddhism “did not exist in [China] in ancient times,” their clothes were different and their lives were lived out differently (Document 4). In his view as a governmental official, Han Yun felt that Buddhism had become such an integral part of their lives that they were tearing apart the foundation of their

China has been the home to various religions. At different times different dynasties endorsed certain religions while repressing others. While Buddhism flourished during the Sui and Tang dynasty, it faced opposition from the government during the Song dynasty. Confucianism lost government endorsement during the Sui and Tang but gained momentum during the Song as Neo-Confucianism. Yuan dynasty promoted Islam and Tibet Buddhism but ignored Confucianism. Different rulers sponsored and protected different religions but Confucianism and some form of Buddhism have always been alive in Chinese society from 600 to 1450.

In classical India, the religion of Buddhism was formed in reaction to the strict ways of Hinduism. Many people, mainly lower class, converted to seek a better life and be enlightened more efficiently. This new religion made its way to China where much of its population converted through trade and missionaries. The conversion of Buddhism in China caused many effects of the spread of Buddhism because of its influential impacts from 300 to 900 CE which are influencing the government, caused some people to reject it, and mainly was a unifying force for China. An effect the spread of Buddhism is the influence of its morals on China’s government in 300-900 CE (Doc’s 1, 7). On some occasions Chinese people vehemently rejected Buddhism and rather practice more Chinese driven religion (Doc’s 5, 7). The most impactful effect of the spread of Buddhism is its ability to unite the Chinese in the way of

There were some in the civilization that did not support, nor reject Buddhism but simply tolerated it. In document 3, the anonymous Chinese scholar answer questions about Buddhism that you can assume were frequently asked questions in China during the time period. He defends Buddhism to an extent, yet does not support it. He believes that neither Confucianism nor Buddhism has all the answers. Document 5 tries to make amends with all three religions saying they are the same at the basis. He is attempting to create a compromise so that all three religions can live in peace in China. Zong Mi seems very unbiased at first, however he is a Buddhist scholar so he might be trying to defend Buddhism by saying all these religions do the same things in different ways so just let everyone do their own thing. An additional document to help more effectively analyze the responses to the spread of

“It is often said that, aside from the impact of Marxism on twentieth-century China, the only other time when the Chinese looked beyond their own borders for intellectual sustenance was during the period when Buddhism was absorbed from India” (LaFleur 23). Why did this religion appeal to the Chinese when they disregarded so many other external influences? After all, being tied to the rest of the world by the Silk Road meant they were constantly inundated with novel concepts from far and wide. The answer must lie in how Buddhism interacted with the other faiths already established in the country, namely Confucianism and Daoism (sometimes spelled Taoism). While at first glance it may appear that Confucian China would be the last place

Buddhism was founded in India in the sixth century B.C.E. and gradually moved to China after the fall of the Han dynasty in 220 C.E. For several centuries Buddhism influenced China greatly. During that time to 570 C.E., China experienced an era of political instability and disunity, afterwards which the imperial structure was restored. During the 1st century C.E. the spread of Buddhism from India to China was met with mixed results, in which many Chinese people accepted Buddhism and advocated its principles such as the philosophy and promise of afterlife over the Confucian ideals that were previously instituted, but the truth was that Chinese masses turned to Buddhism for its promises of eternal enlightenment during times of struggle and invasion

According to Han Yu, the Buddha was a barbarian and the things he said were not inclusive of Confucian philosophies and beliefs (Doc 4). It is evident that Han Yu responded negatively to Buddhism as he viewed the Buddha as a barbarian and highly discredited the religion. Han Yu continued by stating that a relic bone of the Buddha admitted into the palace was foul and unlucky. He ended by referring to Buddhism as an evil and wanted to eradicate it as soon as possible (Doc 4). An extreme hatred and pessimistic response is seen as Han Yu continuously downgrades the Buddha and wanted to entirely eliminate Buddhism from the country for future generations. This hatred most likely came from the fact that Han Yu was a biased Confucian leader during 819 C.E., which was during the Tang Dynasty when imperial authority already returned. According to Tang Emperor Wu, Buddhism was like a vine poisoning the entire country of China (Doc 6). First of all, an opposing view can be seen as Emperor Wu called Buddhism a “poison.” Tang Emperor Wu continues by stating that Buddhism caused the people to leave their duties and responsibilities behind, affecting the people of China. Monks and nuns were also living off of the people. He also commented that Buddhism should be eradicated as it was an evil (Doc 6). This further emphasizes the negative reaction that the Emperor had towards Buddhism as he believed it ruined the wellbeing of the people who left their jobs of being farmers and tending to silkworms. Emperor Wu did rule during the Tang Dynasty, which was when Confucian exams were brought back and Confucianism was implemented once again into China, hence why he was completely in opposition to Buddhism. In addition, it was uncertain to whether people were actually being negatively affected by those who may have

Buddhism originated in India in the 5th century B.C.E. It then spread to China in the 1st century B.C.E. In the period of disunity as well as political instability, most Chinese peasants accepted Buddhism because it provided shelter and certainty. Scholars showed that Buddhism beliefs were not a threat opposed to Confucianism and Daoism, hoping the people could see how they all can coexist. As the imperial structure improved and grew over time, many authorities and high powers rejected its teachings because it saw Buddhism as a threat to their powers.

In document 3, the anonymous Chinese scholar says that Confucianism, alone, does not contain every answer. This supports the thesis because it means that shunning another religion and being close-minded does not give you wisdom; coexisting is possible. In document 3, the Chinese scholar said this right before imperial structure was restored 570 C.E. with the Sui dynasty, so some might have been demanding for Buddhism to explain itself and its usefulness before it was thrown out. In document 5, Zong Mi, the Buddhist scholar, writes about how all 3 teachings (Daosim, Confucianism, and Buddhism) promote goodness and therefore should be respected. This supports the thesis about coexisting because each way of life is accorded to the demands of each person so one way of life does not fit for every single person. Obviously, the reason that Zong Mi, the Buddhist scholar, wrote this in the early ninth century was because it was around that time that Neo-Confucianism arose which is a mixture of Confucianism, Daoism, and Buddhism. An additional document that would be interesting could be the schedule of a Neo-Confucian to understand how easy it is to practice all 3 and not have either contradict each other. This could further explain the thesis because many have practiced it like this and it could show them practicing the Confucian social norms at home,

On top of being advantageous for the justification of Wu’s throne, the adoption of Buddhism also benefitted the Chinese government. Wu’s openhanded policies towards Buddhism and her proclamation of an era of peace brought the empire economic stability and prosperity (Smarr Feb. 17 2012). The reciprocated correlation between religion and state is clearly identified by Wu’s unambiguous relationship with Buddhism: Wu accepts the previously rejected religion and becomes its primary fiscal source, which ultimately leads to the wide-spread of Buddhism throughout the country, while Buddhism, in return, legitimizes her reign and facilitates the trade routes on the silk roads to the western world, bringing countless advantages to China and significantly boosting the Chinese economy during a peaceful period.

The term “Confucianism” is often regarded as a complex mechanism of social, political, moral as well as religious beliefs that have considerable influence especially upon the civilizations belonging to the East Asian countries such as China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, North Korea, South Korea along with Singapore and Vietnam. With reference to the observation made by Reid (1999), it can be viewed that a clear depiction about different principles and beliefs exists within the sphere of “Confucianism”. Therefore, the major purpose of this report is to briefly review of T. R. Reid’s book “Confucius Lives Next Door: What Leaving In The East Teaches Us About Living In the West” through concisely unfolding the experience of

In this essay, two world religions will be compared to see how similar and/or how different they are; these two religions are Confucianism and Buddhism. Confucianism speaks about the wise thoughts that Confucius came across throughout his life. Buddhism speaks about how to acquire great knowledge throughout life. Confucianism was founded by a Chinese man, but Buddhism was founded by an Indian man. These quick comparisons show how the religions differ, but more detailed comparisons will be seen throughout the essay.

The main thought of Humanistic Buddhism is on people themselves, which is an evolvement that adapted Buddhism to the society. The Buddhist revolution movement was triggered by certain conditions. After thousands of year’s development, many shortcomings appeared so the tradition cannot adapt the modern society. Furthermore, people’s increasing respect and promotion of science made Buddhism in China attacked by the government and intelligentsia.