Concept explainers
(a)
The wave function of the reflected wave.
To verify: The ratio of reflected to incident probability density is
Formula Used:
The coefficient of reflected wave is
Calculation:
Now go back to the two conditions of a valid solution and eliminate the coefficient of the reflecred wave, B.
Solve the combined conditions for the coefficient of the decaying wave, C.
Use the coefficient of the decaying wave, C, the wave number of the incident wave, K, and the decay constant of the decaying wave,
Substitute
Now go back to the two conditions of a valid solution and eliminate the coefficient of the reflected wave, B.
Solve the combined conditions for the coefficient of the decaying wave, C.
Use the coefficient of the decaying wave, C, the wave number of the incident wave, K, and the decay constant of the decaying wave,
Substitute
The ratio of the reflected probability density to the incident probability density can be found by diving the magnitude squared of the reflected wave,
Conclusion:
The ratio of reflected probability density to the icidemt prpability density is
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionChapter 6 Solutions
Modern Physics
- In a scattering experiment, the potential is spherically symmetric and the particles are scat- tered at such energy that only s and p waves need be considered. If the differential cross-section o (0) can be written in the form o (0) = a+bcos0+ccos? 0 , then what are the values of a, b, c in the terms of phase shifts? What is the value oftotal cross-section in terms ofa, b, c?arrow_forwardCalculate the transmission probability for quantum-mechanical tunneling in each of the following cases. (a) An electron with an energy deficit of U - E= 0.010 0 eV is incident on a square barrier of width L = 0.100 nm. (b) An electron with an energy deficit of 1.00 eV is incident on the same barrier. (c) An alpha particle (mass 6.64 × 10-27 kg) with an energy deficit of 1.00 MeV is incident on a square barrier of width 1.00 fm. (d) An 8.00-kg bowling ball withan energy deficit of 1.00 J is incident on a square barrier of width 2.00 cm.arrow_forwardFfor a particle rotating on a ring, (a) give the expression of the probability py(?) of finding the particle at angle ? in the state arrow_forward
- Assume one-dimensional wave packet at time t=0 is constructed with g (k)=0 for karrow_forwardA series of experiments by Clinton Davisson and Lester Germer in the 1920s gave a clear indication of the wave nature of matter. The investigators scattered a relatively low energy electron beam from a nickel crystal. They found very strong reflections at certain angles that varied with the energy of the electron beam. The strong reflections were analogous to those observed in x-ray diffraction. The angles at which the intensity of the reflected beam peaks agreed with the Bragg condition if the electrons were assumed to have a wavelength given by the de Broglie formula. This was conclusive experimental proof of the wave nature of the electron. Davisson and Germer used an electron beam that was directed perpendicular to the surface, as shown. They observed a particularly strong reflection, corresponding to m = 1 in the Bragg condition, at Φ = 50°. At this angle, the spacing between the scattering planes was d = 0.091 nm. If an investigator wanted to reproduce the results…arrow_forwardCalculate the probability that an electron will be found (a) between x = 0.1 and 0.2 nm, (b) between 4.9 and 5.2 nm in a box of length L = 10 nm when its wavefunction is Ψ = (2/L)1/2 sin(2πx/L). Treat the wavefunction as a constant in the small region of interest and interpret δV as δx.arrow_forwardConsider a particle with the following wave-function: ,xL and L and A are constants. (a) What is the normalization constant A (in terms of L)? (b) What is (in terms of L)? ? (ie, ) (c) What is the probability that the particle will be found within x=0 and L/2?arrow_forwardA series of experiments by Clinton Davisson and Lester Germer in the 1920s gave a clear indication of the wave nature of matter. The investigators scattered a relatively low energy electron beam from a nickel crystal. They found very strong reflections at certain angles that varied with the energy of the electron beam. The strong reflections were analogous to those observed in x-ray diffraction. The angles at which the intensity of the reflected beam peaks agreed with the Bragg condition if the electrons were assumed to have a wavelength given by the de Broglie formula. This was conclusive experimental proof of the wave nature of the electron. Davisson and Germer used an electron beam that was directed perpendicular to the surface, as shown. They observed a particularly strong reflection, corresponding to m = 1 in the Bragg condition, at Φ = 50°. At this angle, the spacing between the scattering planes was d = 0.091 nm. If the accelerating voltage is increased, what…arrow_forwardA series of experiments by Clinton Davisson and Lester Germer in the 1920s gave a clear indication of the wave nature of matter. The investigators scattered a relatively low energy electron beam from a nickel crystal. They found very strong reflections at certain angles that varied with the energy of the electron beam. The strong reflections were analogous to those observed in x-ray diffraction. The angles at which the intensity of the reflected beam peaks agreed with the Bragg condition if the electrons wereassumed to have a wavelength given by the de Broglie formula. This was conclusive experimental proof of the wave nature of the electron. Davisson and Germer used an electron beam that was directed perpendicular to the surface, as shown. They observed a particularly strong reflection, corresponding to m = 1 in the Bragg condition, at φ = 50°. At this angle, the spacing between the scattering planes was d = 0.091 nm. What is the de Broglie wavelength of electrons in the beam?A. 0.077…arrow_forwardA series of experiments by Clinton Davisson and Lester Germer in the 1920s gave a clear indication of the wave nature of matter. The investigators scattered a relatively low energy electron beam from a nickel crystal. They found very strong reflections at certain angles that varied with the energy of the electron beam. The strong reflections were analogous to those observed in x-ray diffraction. The angles at which the intensity of the reflected beam peaks agreed with the Bragg condition if the electrons wereassumed to have a wavelength given by the de Broglie formula. This was conclusive experimental proof of the wave nature of the electron. Davisson and Germer used an electron beam that was directed perpendicular to the surface, as shown. They observed a particularly strong reflection, corresponding to m = 1 in the Bragg condition, at φ = 50°. At this angle, the spacing between the scattering planes was d = 0.091 nm. What is the accelerating voltage?A. 45 V B. 55 VC. 65 V…arrow_forwardThe radial function of a particle in a central potential is give by wave [ - r R(r) = A-exp where A is the normalization constant and a is positive constant еxp а 2a of suitable dimensions. If ya is the most probable distance of the particle from the force center, the value of y isarrow_forwardDerive the quantuin mechanical expression for the s-wave cross section for scattering from a hard sphere of radius R.arrow_forwardarrow_back_iosSEE MORE QUESTIONSarrow_forward_ios
- Classical Dynamics of Particles and SystemsPhysicsISBN:9780534408961Author:Stephen T. Thornton, Jerry B. MarionPublisher:Cengage LearningModern PhysicsPhysicsISBN:9781111794378Author:Raymond A. Serway, Clement J. Moses, Curt A. MoyerPublisher:Cengage LearningPrinciples of Physics: A Calculus-Based TextPhysicsISBN:9781133104261Author:Raymond A. Serway, John W. JewettPublisher:Cengage Learning