Assume that the two universities in USA (UA and UAA) are competing with one another to attract top students to join their PhD programs. To attract the best students, university management offers scholarships so that students will choose to further their studies at their universities. Assuming that there are two types of scholarship packages offered: Premier Scholarships (which is more attractive but costs more to the university) and Basic Scholarships. If both universities offers the same scholarship package, they will divide the number of students in a 50%-50% ratio. If one of the university offers the Premier Scholarship and the other university offers the Basic Scholarship, the university that offers the Premier Scholarship will attract 80% of the top students. [Note: Assume that the payoff to the university is in the form: (% of top students to UA; % top students to UAA]. (a) What is the Nash equilibrium for this game? Provide a brief explanation. (b) Is there an incentive for both universities to collude? Provide a brief explanation.

Assume that the two universities in USA (UA and UAA) are competing with one another to attract top students to join their PhD programs. To attract the best students, university management offers scholarships so that students will choose to further their studies at their universities. Assuming that there are two types of scholarship packages offered: Premier Scholarships (which is more attractive but costs more to the university) and Basic Scholarships. If both universities offers the same scholarship package, they will divide the number of students in a 50%-50% ratio. If one of the university offers the Premier Scholarship and the other university offers the Basic Scholarship, the university that offers the Premier Scholarship will attract 80% of the top students. [Note: Assume that the payoff to the university is in the form: (% of top students to UA; % top students to UAA]. (a) What is the Nash equilibrium for this game? Provide a brief explanation. (b) Is there an incentive for both universities to collude? Provide a brief explanation.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

MICROECONOMICS

Assume that the two universities in USA (UA and UAA) are competing with one another to
attract top students to join their PhD programs. To attract the best students, university
management offers scholarships so that students will choose to further their studies at their
universities. Assuming that there are two types of scholarship packages offered: Premier
Scholarships (which is more attractive but costs more to the university) and Basic Scholarships.
If both universities offers the same scholarship package, they will divide the number of students
in a 50%-50% ratio. If one of the university offers the Premier Scholarship and the other
university offers the Basic Scholarship, the university that offers the Premier Scholarship will
attract 80% of the top students. [Note: Assume that the payoff to the university is in the form: (% of top
students to UA; % top students to UAA].
(a) What is the Nash equilibrium for this game? Provide a brief explanation.
(b) Is there an incentive for both universities to collude? Provide a brief explanation.

Study of decisions made by households and business firms at an individual level. It includes several laws and theorems related to demand, supply, production, allocation of resources, and prices.

Expert Solution

This question has been solved!

Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.

SEE SOLUTION Check out a sample Q&A here

Step 1

Step 2

Step 3

Step 4

Step by step

Solved in 4 steps with 2 images

SEE SOLUTION Check out a sample Q&A here

Knowledge Booster

Learn more about

Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.

Similar questions

The Battle of the Bismarck Sea (named for that part of the southwestern Pacific Ocean separating the Bismarck Archipelago from Papua New Guinea) was a naval engagement played between the United States and Japan during World War II. In 1943, a Japanese admiral was ordered to move a convoy of ships to New Guinea; he had to choose between a rainy northern route and a sunnier southern route, both of which required three days' sailing time. TheAmericans knew that the convoy would sail and wanted to send bombers after it, but they did not know which route it would take. The Americans had to send reconnaissance planes to scout for the convoy, but they had only enough reconnaissance planes to explore one route at a time. Both the Japanese and the Americans had to make their decisions with no knowledge of the plans being made by the other side. If the convoy was on the route that the Americans explored first, they could send bombers right away; if not, they lost a day of bombing. Poor weather…
Royal Dutch Shell has been doing business in Nigeria since the 1920s, and has announced new plans to develop oil and gas projects there. However, over the years Shell has confronted a series of episodes involving country risk. Shell’s operations are centred in Nigeria’s Ogoni region, where the local citizens have protested Shell’s drilling and refining activities, which are said to spoil the natural environment and reduce the amount of available farmland. Protestors also accuse Shell of extracting wealth from the region without adequately compensating local residents. Ogonis sabotaged Shell’s operations to such an extent that the firm suspended parts of its Nigerian operations. Shell also came under pressure to divest its Nigerian operations and to pay reparations to the locals. What proactive steps can Shell take to anticipate future country risk? What should Shell do to deal more effectively with country risk?
Imagine that you were (unfortunately) involved in a car accident and are now in need of a lawyer to represent your interests as you attempt to secure compensation for your injuries and material losses (your wrecked car, for instance). The lawyer that you end up hiring has a lot of other clients and has an incentive to encourage you to take the first proposed settlement (dollar amount) that comes your way, even though you would prefer to hold out for the most money possible. This is an example of a___________. a. Free-rider problem b. Prisoner's dilemma c. Social choice problem d. Coordination problem e. Principal-agent (delegation) problem
The conventional wisdom for urban economic development is: “Don’t put all your eggs in one basket. Diversify the economy.” To explain the idea of diversification, consider old McDonald, who must carry a dozen eggs from the barn to the house. The ground between the barn and the house is slippery, so there is a 50 percent chance that McDonald will slip on a given trip and break all the eggs in his basket. Consider two strategies: a one-basket strategy (a single trip with all 12 eggs) and a two-basket strategy (two trips, with 6 eggs per trip). INDEPTH ANSWERS. Questions= (1.)List all of the possible outcomes under each of the strategies. Question (2.)What is the expected number of delivered (unbroken) eggs under each strategy ? Question (3.)What are the trade-offs between the two strategies? If you were McDonald, which strategy would you adopt? Question (4.)What are the lessons for economic development strategies?
Assume that the countries of Irun and Urun are the only two producers of crude oil. Further assume that both countries have entered into an agreement to maintain certain production levels in order to maximize profits. In the world market for oil, the demand curve is downward sloping. Refer to Scenario 16-1. The fact that both countries have colluded to earn higher profit shows their desire to keep production levels above the monopoly level of output. below the Nash equilibrium level of output. equal to the Nash equilibrium level of output above the Nash equilibrium level of output.
Problem: Imagine you have two competing athletes who have the option to use an illegal and dangerous drug to enhance their performance (i.e., dope). If neither athlete dopes, then neither gain an advantage. If only one dopes, then that athlete gains a massive advantage over their competitor, reduced by the medical and legal risks of doping (the athletes believe the advantage over their competitor outweighs the risks from doping ). However, if both athletes dope, the advantages cancel out, and only the risks remain, putting them both in a worse position than if neither had been doping. What outcome do we expect from these two athletes? Please use ideas like concepts of monopolies, Oligopolies and Game Theory and Factor markets for this scenario.
Four neighbors, each with a vegetable garden, agree to share their produce. One will grow beans (B), one will grow lettuce (L), one will grow tomatoes (T), and one will grow zucchini (Z). Table shows what fraction of each crop each neighbor will receive. What prices should the neighbors charge for their crops if each person is to break even and the lowest-priced crop has a value of $50?
Pirates of the Caribbean When Spain colonized the New World, they extracted untold riches from there to finance their wars in Europe. The gold and silver had to be transported back to Europe on ships and these were attractive targets for pirates and privateers from other countries. Imagine the fictional Capitano Juan Barcodoro, who is in Cartagena and has to bring his cargo safely back to Sevilla, but he knows that the ruthless French pirate François Dragon is lurking. He can sail one of two routes: following the coast to Trinidad or go for Santo Domingo on Hispaniola. The pirates have to decide where they try to intercept him. Barcodoro is on the left and François Dragon on top, and their payoffs are on the left/right. Juan François Trinidad Hispaniola 5/-2 Trinidad -8/6 Hispaniola 2/-3 -8/7 What is Barcodoro's best response if he believes the pirates are at Trinidad? What if he believes they are at Hispaniola? Also find the pirates' best responses. Is there a Nash equilibrium in pure…
Consider the following Stackelberg model. There are two firms in the market. Firm 1 is the leader and firm 2 is the follower. Firms can decide to produce low or high. The extensive-form representation below presents the profits depending on production decisions of firms. The first value is profit of firm 1 and second value is profit of firm 2 depending on their production decisions. Solve using backward-induction. What are the optimal production levels of both firms? Describe how you found the optimal strategy using words.see the image
Michelle owns an independent bookstore and has observed that college graduates read more than people without degrees. She is considering offering a 10% discount on book purchases to customers who have a postsecondary degree. Why might Michelle's plan hurt rather than help her business? People who read more books are likely to have a higher willingness to pay than others. People with higher education typically earn more than others and so may have a higher willingness to pay. High educational achievement is not a difficult-to-change characteristic. Whether an individual has a postsecondary degree is not easily verifiable.
In 2018, Spotify was available in many countries around the world. The same year, Spotify offered an attractive deal available only to students-Spotify Premium, Hulu Limited, and Showtime, all for one monthly payment of $4.99. The fee is half the amount charged for a standard Spotify Premium account. To qualify for the deal, students must provide their information, such as name and birthdate, to Spotify and its third-party partner, SheerID. SheerID is a verification service utilized by companies to confirm various personal attributes and qualifications. In this case, your current student status at a Title IX school is in a database, which is accessed by SheerID. a. In making this offer to students, Spotify is engaging in group pricing, where the market segments are students and nonstudents. using the hurdle method, getting people to self-identify their willingness to pay by requiring them to overcome one or more obstacles. engaging in perfect price discrimination, charging each…
Question 3 Krugman Model: Suppose that the elasticity of substitution between vari- eties of a differentiated good is o = 3. The marginal cost of production is c = 2, the fixed cost of operating a business is f = 10. There are two countries, H and F, that initally do not trade. The countries differ only in the size of their economies with EH 100 > EF = 50. All the Krugman model assumptions hold regarding preferences, monopolistic competition, free entry, etc. = Starting from the closed economy, answer the following. a. Profits: Using A to denote the level of demand preceived by a typical firm in H, write the typical firm's profit function. Plug in the relevant numbers for the elasticity of substitution, the marginal cost, and the fixed cost, leaving AH as a constant. b. Profit Maximization: Take the derivative of the profit function and solve the first order condition for the optimal price. What is the optimal price charged? c. Free Entry: Now solve for the total number of entrants…