Concept explainers
(a)
Interpretation:
For the given species identify whether it withdraw electrons inductively or donates electrons by hyper conjugation, withdraws electrons by resonance or donates electrons by resonance.
Concept Introduction:
Electronic effect:
Electron donating groups decreases acidity by inductive effect (withdrawal of electrons through a sigma bond). Electron withdrawal increases acidity. Electron-donating substituents destabilize a base, and decrease the strength of its conjugate acid; electron-withdrawing substituents stabilize a base, which increase the strength of its conjugate base.
Rule: The strength of a base depends on the stability of its conjugate acid.
(b)
Interpretation:
For the given species identify whether it withdraw electrons inductively or donates electrons by hyper conjugation, withdraws electrons by resonance or donates electrons by resonance.
Concept Introduction:
Electronic effect:
Electron donating groups decreases acidity by inductive effect (withdrawal of electrons through a sigma bond). Electron withdrawal increases acidity. Electron-donating substituents destabilize a base, and decrease the strength of its conjugate acid; electron-withdrawing substituents stabilize a base, which increase the strength of its conjugate base.
Rule: The strength of a base depends on the stability of its conjugate acid.
(c)
Interpretation:
For the given species identify whether it withdraw electrons inductively or donates electrons by hyper conjugation, withdraws electrons by resonance or donates electrons by resonance.
Concept Introduction:
Electronic effect:
Electron donating groups decreases acidity by inductive effect (withdrawal of electrons through a sigma bond). Electron withdrawal increases acidity. Electron-donating substituents destabilize a base, and decrease the strength of its conjugate acid; electron-withdrawing substituents stabilize a base, which increase the strength of its conjugate base.
Rule: The strength of a base depends on the stability of its conjugate acid.
(d)
Interpretation:
For the given species identify whether it withdraw electrons inductively or donates electrons by hyper conjugation, withdraws electrons by resonance or donates electrons by resonance.
Concept Introduction:
Electronic effect:
Electron donating groups decreases acidity by inductive effect (withdrawal of electrons through a sigma bond). Electron withdrawal increases acidity. Electron-donating substituents destabilize a base, and decrease the strength of its conjugate acid; electron-withdrawing substituents stabilize a base, which increase the strength of its conjugate base.
Rule: The strength of a base depends on the stability of its conjugate acid.
(e)
Interpretation:
For the given species identify whether it withdraw electrons inductively or donates electrons by hyper conjugation, withdraws electrons by resonance or donates electrons by resonance.
Concept Introduction:
Electronic effect:
Electron donating groups decreases acidity by inductive effect (withdrawal of electrons through a sigma bond). Electron withdrawal increases acidity. Electron-donating substituents destabilize a base, and decrease the strength of its conjugate acid; electron-withdrawing substituents stabilize a base, which increase the strength of its conjugate base.
Rule: The strength of a base depends on the stability of its conjugate acid.
(f)
Interpretation:
For the given species identify whether it withdraw electrons inductively or donates electrons by hyper conjugation, withdraws electrons by resonance or donates electrons by resonance.
Concept Introduction:
Electronic effect:
Electron donating groups decreases acidity by inductive effect (withdrawal of electrons through a sigma bond). Electron withdrawal increases acidity. Electron-donating substituents destabilize a base, and decrease the strength of its conjugate acid; electron-withdrawing substituents stabilize a base, which increase the strength of its conjugate base.
Rule: The strength of a base depends on the stability of its conjugate acid.
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionChapter 7 Solutions
Essential Organic Chemistry (3rd Edition)
- 1. For each compound, label the chemical equivalent hydrogens. Include cis-trans hydrogens on rings when they are inequivalent. Example: H₂C Br -CH₂ H₂C H₂C 8 CH₂CH₂ CH₂ CH₂arrow_forwardWhich molecule(s) are achiral? A. (2R,3R)-2,3-Dichloropentane B. (2R,3S)-2,3-Dichloropentane C. (2S,3S)-2,3-Dichlorobutane D. (2R,3S)-2,3-Dichlorobutane E. None of thesearrow_forward2. For each of the following compounds draw a three-dimensional representation. a) (S)-2-chlorobutane b) (2R, 3S)-2,3-dibromohexane c) (R)-1,1,2-trimethylcyclohexanearrow_forward
- Be sure to answer all parts. Name the following compound according to substitutive IUPAC nomenclature. OH (select) (select) (select) (select) 7 of 11 Next> < Prev C F5 PrtSc F6 F4 F7 F10 F8 F9 F3 F11 F12 & # 4 3 7 9 0 CO LO ASTarrow_forward5. Chairs and E2 b. a. Draw the line-bond structure of (1R, 2S,3S)-1-ethyl-2-iodo-3-isopropylcyclohexane. Draw both chair flips of (1R, 2S,3S)-1-ethyl-2-iodo-3-isopropylcyclohexane. Showing all calculations, determine which is the more stable conformation. C. Which chair flip is able to undergo E2 elimination? Justify your answer. d. Show the product of such an E2 elimination using NaOEt as base.arrow_forward1. Draw the most and least stable Newman projections for the following molecules (focus on C2 and C3). a. 2-chloro-2-fluoropentane b. 2,2-dimethylbutane c. 2-chloro-2-methylpentane d. 1,2-dibromoethanearrow_forward
- A. B. C. Me CH3 ClC H ¿ OH NH₂ H Br-C-C H3C H Br CH3 Comparing structure pair in B OH Comparing structure pair in C [Select] Me HC CI Comparing structure pair in A [Select] [Select] Same structure drawn differently Enantiomers Diastereomers NH₂ Br H3C CH3 Br HC-CCH3 H For the following two structures compared in parts A and B, determine whether they are enantiomers OR diastereomers OR the same structure drawn differently (non-bonding electrons not included for clarity).arrow_forwardWithout drawing out the structures, label each pair of compounds as enantiomers or diastereomers. a. (2R,3S)-hexane-2,3-diol and (2R,3R)-hexane-2,3-diol b.(2R,3R)-hexane-2,3-diol and (2S,3S)-hexane-2,3-diol c.(2R,3S,4R)-hexane-2,3,4-triol and (2S,3R,4R)-hexane-2,3,4-triolarrow_forwardRank the following groups in order of decreasing priority. a.−COOH, −H, −NH2, −OH b.−H, −CH3, −Cl, −CH2Cl c. −CH2CH3, −CH3, −H, −CH(CH3)2 d.−CH=CH2, −CH3, −C≡CH, −Harrow_forward
- What is the degree of unsaturation of C8H10ClNO? a. 4 b. 5 c. 6 d. 7arrow_forward4.) Which molecule in each pair is more stable? Hint: consider the potential resonance contributors CH₂ 1+ a. CH₂CH₂CCH₂ or CH₂CH₂CH=CHCH₂ b. CH₂ CH=CH₂ or CH CH=CHCH₂ 0™ c. CH3CHCH=CH₂ or CH₂C=CHCH3 +NH₂ d. 0™ CH₂ or +OH NH₂ CH₂ NH₂arrow_forwardBuild a model of methylcyclohexane, and use the model to complete the following Newmanprojections of methylcyclohexane in the chair conformation: a. When the methyl group is in an axial or equatorial (circle one) position, the molecule is inits lowest potential energy conformation. b. Label one Newman projection above anti and the other gauche to describe the relationshipbetween the methyl group and C3 of the ring. c. In general, which is a lower PE conformation, anti or gauche? d. Explain how your answer to b and c provide an explanation for why it is more favorable fora large group to be in an equatorial than an axial position.arrow_forward
- Organic Chemistry: A Guided InquiryChemistryISBN:9780618974122Author:Andrei StraumanisPublisher:Cengage Learning