What is the null hypothesis for the above urine test for glucose? that glucose in the urine is a consequence of supernatural events that glucose in the urine is not a consequence of natural events that glucose in the urine is not a consequence of diabetes that glucose in the urine is a consequence of diabetes all of the above Compared to the above urine test, a blood test for glucose is more accurate in avoiding both false positive and false negative results in identifying diabetic patients. If a blood test for glucose correctly identifies 90% of diabetic patients, but gives false-positive results for 12% of non-diabetic patients, then: the blood glucose test has improved sensitivity, but reduced specificity (compared to the urine test) the blood glucose test has improved neither sensitivity nor specificity (compared to the urine test) the blood glucose test has reduced both sensitivity and specificity (compared to the urine test) the blood glucose test has improved both sensitivity and specificity (compared to the urine test) the blood glucose test has improved specificity, but reduced sensitivity (compared to the urine test)
What is the null hypothesis for the above urine test for glucose? that glucose in the urine is a consequence of supernatural events that glucose in the urine is not a consequence of natural events that glucose in the urine is not a consequence of diabetes that glucose in the urine is a consequence of diabetes all of the above Compared to the above urine test, a blood test for glucose is more accurate in avoiding both false positive and false negative results in identifying diabetic patients. If a blood test for glucose correctly identifies 90% of diabetic patients, but gives false-positive results for 12% of non-diabetic patients, then: the blood glucose test has improved sensitivity, but reduced specificity (compared to the urine test) the blood glucose test has improved neither sensitivity nor specificity (compared to the urine test) the blood glucose test has reduced both sensitivity and specificity (compared to the urine test) the blood glucose test has improved both sensitivity and specificity (compared to the urine test) the blood glucose test has improved specificity, but reduced sensitivity (compared to the urine test)
Chapter21: Carbohydrate- Controlled Diets For Diabetes Mellitus
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 6SC
Related questions
Question
What is the null hypothesis for the above urine test for glucose?
- that glucose in the urine is a consequence of supernatural events
- that glucose in the urine is not a consequence of natural events
- that glucose in the urine is not a consequence of diabetes
- that glucose in the urine is a consequence of diabetes
- all of the above
- Compared to the above urine test, a blood test for glucose is more accurate in avoiding both false positive and false negative results in identifying diabetic patients. If a blood test for glucose correctly identifies 90% of diabetic patients, but gives false-positive results for 12% of non-diabetic patients, then:
- the blood glucose test has improved sensitivity, but reduced specificity (compared to the urine test)
- the blood glucose test has improved neither sensitivity nor specificity (compared to the urine test)
- the blood glucose test has reduced both sensitivity and specificity (compared to the urine test)
- the blood glucose test has improved both sensitivity and specificity (compared to the urine test)
- the blood glucose test has improved specificity, but reduced sensitivity (compared to the urine test)
AI-Generated Solution
AI-generated content may present inaccurate or offensive content that does not represent bartleby’s views.
Unlock instant AI solutions
Tap the button
to generate a solution
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, biology and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Recommended textbooks for you
Essentials of Pharmacology for Health Professions
Nursing
ISBN:
9781305441620
Author:
WOODROW
Publisher:
Cengage
Essentials of Pharmacology for Health Professions
Nursing
ISBN:
9781305441620
Author:
WOODROW
Publisher:
Cengage