The following are exogenous (not directly affected by income): G = 11 I = 4 X = M = 0 The consumption function is: C = k + cY, where k = 3, c = 0.8 Imagine the maximum potential output or real GDP of this economy is 100. Assume that is the same as saying we reach the edge of the PPF at 100. Now assume we want to get that economy from the current level of GDP to its maximum potential of 100. We can do this in two ways - either increase government spending (G) or reduce taxes, (we will soon learn that doing this is called "using expansionary fiscal policy") but this economy does not tax its citizens so the only way to do it to increase G. How much do we increase government spending so that actual GDP reaches potential output/edge of the PPF at 100?

The following are exogenous (not directly affected by income): G = 11 I = 4 X = M = 0 The consumption function is: C = k + cY, where k = 3, c = 0.8 Imagine the maximum potential output or real GDP of this economy is 100. Assume that is the same as saying we reach the edge of the PPF at 100. Now assume we want to get that economy from the current level of GDP to its maximum potential of 100. We can do this in two ways - either increase government spending (G) or reduce taxes, (we will soon learn that doing this is called "using expansionary fiscal policy") but this economy does not tax its citizens so the only way to do it to increase G. How much do we increase government spending so that actual GDP reaches potential output/edge of the PPF at 100?

Economics:

10th Edition

ISBN:9781285859460

Author:BOYES, William

Publisher:BOYES, William

Chapter9: Aggregate Expenditures

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 12E

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

a) True or False: Absolute PPP may hold even when relative PPP does not because Absolute PPP looks at levels at a specific point in time, and levels are always comparable, regardless of the composition of the consumption bundle.
Describe how the endogeneity versus exogeneity of consumption expenditures (i.e., the household sector) affects the size of predicted output multipliers by an input-output model.
A 3-sector economic model was constructed and solved, and assuming the parameters take on certain values, the multiplier matrix that is obtained is displayed in Table 1. You are required to answer the following questions by showing your calculation in the space provided. Table 1: Multiplier Matrix Exogenous Variables Endogenous Variables I* G* T* : Output : Consumption Expenditure 1.895 : Tax Revenue Y 2.631 2.631 - 2.105 C 1.895 - 2.316 T 0.263 0.263 0.789 YD : Disposable Income : Government Budget 2.368 2.368 - 2.895 0.263 - 0.737 0.789 Balance : Saving 0.474 0.474 - 0.579 (a) If autonomous investment is reduced by 100, justify its precise impact on disposable income and tax. Answer : AYD = AT = 80, what is the amount of (b) If the govemment has increased its spending by autonomous tax that is required so that the govemment's action in increasing its spending does NOT have an impact on the government's budget balance? Answer : AT* =
The diagram below shows alternate paths for two hypothetical economies, each starting with GDP of $1 billion. Assume that Area 1 is equal to Area 2. Real Consumption FIGURE 25-1 Area 1 Year X Aren 2 Time Year Y Economy B 2% growth Economy A 1% growth h Refer to Figure 25-1. Suppose Economy A jumps to the path of Economy B at Year 0 by increasing the share of GDP that is saved. In that case, which of the following statements about Economy A is true? O a. By jumping to a new growth path at Year 0, Economy A has increased the share of national income that is consumed. O b. By Year Y, the increase in consumption made possible by the economy's higher growth rate approximately equals the consumption sacrificed in earlier years. Oc By Year X, Economy A is saving and investing the same share of its national income as it would have been had it stayed on its original path Od. Economy A will not be able to regain the losses in consumption it incurs by jumping to the path of Economy B Oe. By Year…
In the country of Borealis, the minimum amount of consumption spending that will occur is $300 - that is, no matter what level of income households have, the aggregate amount of consumption spending in the economy will be at least $300. In addition, for every extra dollar of national income, consumption spending will increase by $0.75.
Why is consumption spending insufficient to explain economic growth and rising standards of living?
The production function for an economy can be expressed as Y= F(K,L), where Y is real GDP, K is the quantity of capital in the economy, and L is the quantity of labor in the economy. If Y = K0.5 L0.5, what is real GDP if the quantity of capital is 900 and the quantity of labor is а. 400? b. What is/are the endogenous variable(s) in this model? What is/are the exogenous variable(s) in this model? с.
Consider the following model. Expenditure is given by: E = C +1 + G. The consumption function is specified as: C = c0 +cY. We assume a closed macroeconomics system so that: Y=E. If the model parameters are configured such that I= 500, G=2000, c0=1000 and c=0.8, what will the level of consumption expenditure, C, be equal to? a. 4,375 b. 15,000 c. 14,000 Cd. 14,500
Consider an economy in which production is characterized by the neoclassical productionfunction:Y = K0.5N0.5Suppose that it has a saving rate (s) of 0.1, a population growth rate (n) of 0.02, and an average depreciationrate (d) of 0.03.a) Write this production function in per capita form, and find the steady-state values of per capitacapital k and per capita output y.b) At the steady-state value of k, is there more or less capital than at the golden-rule level?c) Determine what saving rate would yield the golden-rule level of capital in this model.
What is exogenous (autonomous) expenditure and what is the value of the multiplier? Calculate equilibrium output for this economy. Show how you obtained your figure.
If the consumption function is given by the equation C = 500 + 0.5Y, the production function is Y = 50K0.5L0.5, where K = 100 and L = 100, then C %3D equals to Select one: a. 1,000 cross out b. 2,500 cross out с. 3,000 cross out d. 5,000 cross out e. 6,000 cross out
The following are exogenous (not directly affected by income): G = 9 I = 14 X = M = 0 The consumption function is: C = k + cY, where k = 8, c = 0.6 What is the equilibrium level of GDP? State to ONE decimal place What is the multiplier for this economy? The following are exogenous (not directly affected by income): G = 11 I = 4 X = M = 0 The consumption function is: C = k + cY, where k = 3, c = 0.8 What is the equilibrium level of GDP? What is the multiplier? Same information as in the previous question: The following are exogenous (not directly affected by income): G = 11 I = 4 X = M = 0 The consumption function is: C = k + cY, where k = 3, c = 0.8 Imagine the maximum potential output or real GDP of this economy is 100. Assume that is the same as saying we reach the edge of the PPF at 100. Now assume we want to get that economy from the current level of GDP to its maximum potential of 100. We can do this in two ways - either increase government spending (G) or reduce taxes, (we…