Consider the two-country model of technology growth. Suppose that yA,1 > YA,2 and that the two countries are in steady state. (a) Suppose now that Country 1 raises the fraction of the labor force that is doing R&D. Draw a picture showing how the rates of growth in Countries 1 and 2 will behave over time. (b) Now suppose that Country 2 raises the fraction of the labor force that is doing R&D so much that yA,1 < VA,2. Draw a picture showing how the rates of growth in Countries 1 and 2 will behave over time.

Consider the two-country model of technology growth. Suppose that yA,1 > YA,2 and that the two countries are in steady state. (a) Suppose now that Country 1 raises the fraction of the labor force that is doing R&D. Draw a picture showing how the rates of growth in Countries 1 and 2 will behave over time. (b) Now suppose that Country 2 raises the fraction of the labor force that is doing R&D so much that yA,1 < VA,2. Draw a picture showing how the rates of growth in Countries 1 and 2 will behave over time.

ECON MACRO

5th Edition

ISBN:9781337000529

Author:William A. McEachern

Publisher:William A. McEachern

Chapter8: Productivity And Growth

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 2.4P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

What are the advantages of backwardness for economic growth?
Sweden and Norway are two neighboring countries in Northern Europe with similar savings rates, population growth rates, technology growth rates, and depreciation rates. However, Norway differs from Sweden in that Norway has large deposits of oil all along its coast, which makes it very easy for Norway to produce large quantities of crude oil every year with relatively little capital and labor. a) Draw a Solow Growth diagram that compares Sweden and Norway. What is the main difference between the two countries in the diagram? b) According to the Solow Growth Model, which country would have a higher standard of living in the long run? Which country would have a higher growth rate of its standard of living in the long run? c) Suppose now that, in the long run, oil becomes obsolete and has no value because it is uneconomical relative to renewable energy sources like solar and wind power. What would this do to your Solow Growth diagram in part a? How would the standard of living in Norway…
The graph below shows the standard model for economic growth. Output per worker В A Capital per worker One curve represents New Zealand and the other Ghana. The country of Ghana is likely to be at point while New Zealand is likely to be at point The improvement in output per worker due to adopting new technology could be shown as Which of the following does the model above suggest? Oeconomic growth in New Zealand is higher than it is in Ghana Oit is possible for Ghana to experience relatively high growth rates compared to New Zealand OGhana is poor due to high rates of corruption and poor infrastructure Othe only way for Ghana to raise living standards is to adopt new technology
) The goal is to analyze further the two-sector endogenous growth model. Write down the equation of motion for k, which shows delta k as saving minus break-even investment. (Break-even investment is the amount of investment needed to keep capital per effective worker constant.) Draw a graph that determines the steady-state k. In this economy, what's the steady-state growth rate of output per work? How do the saving rate and fraction of labor force in universities (u) affect this steady-state growth rate?
Consider the endogenous growth model with two sectors: manufacturing firms and research universities. Which of the following affect/s the steady-state growth rate of output in this model? (i) stock of knowledge (ii) fraction of labor force in universities (iii) saving rate O a. Only (ii) O b. Only (iii) O c. Only (i) O d. (i), (ii), and (iii)
3. An economy described by the Augmented Solow growth model has the following production function with populationgrowth (1+n) and technological growth (1+z):y =p(k)(a) Solve for the steady-state values of capital per capita and output as a function of s, n, z, and δ.(b) A developed country has a saving rate of 28 percent and a population growth rate of 1 percent per year. A lessdeveloped country has a saving rate of 10 percent and a population growth rate of 4 percent per year. In bothcountries, g = 0.02 and d = 0.04. Find the steady-state value of y for each country.(c) What policies might the less developed country pursue to raise its level of income? Graphically demonstrate howyour advised policy would increase income per capita (y).
Population Growth and Technological Progress – Work It Out PLEASE WRITE ANSWERS CLEARLY An economy has a Cobb-Douglas production function: Y = K“(LE)'-a The economy has a capital share of 0.30, a saving rate of 42 percent, a depreciation rate of 4.00 percent, a rate of population growth of 5.25 percent, and a rate of labor-augmenting technological change of 3.5 percent. It is in steady state. b. Solve for capital per effective worker (k*), output per effective worker (y*), and the marginal product of capital. k* = y* = marginal product of capital =
rowth: Homework Saved years Help Save & Ex Suppose that real GDP per capita in the United States is $53,500. If the long-term growth rate of real GDP per capita is 4.5% per year, how many years will it take for real GDP per capita to reach $107,000? Instructions: Enter your answer as a whole number. Chac
4. Assume our endogenous growth model with 0<1. Now assume that a more open immigration policy suddenly boosts the US population growth rate to a higher constant rate: n'. Graph the short and long-run effects of this in a graph of the growth rate in ideas over time.
where H(0) = a# _ ]s(ß) Consider a simplified version of endogenous growth model discussed in the class. The growth rate is determined by: Region 1: For 0 se s$(1-m), s(B) 9t = H(8), + a' 1- Region 2 and 3: For (1- n) s 0 s 1, 9t = a#s(ß) %3D Note that s(B) Assume the following parameter values: 1+B° aH = 2, a² = 1, B = 1, 7 = 0.25 Q1: Suppose 0 = 0.25. Derive the economic growth rate. Q2: Suppose 0 = 0.5. Derive the economic growth rate. (Q3-Q5 will follow in the next page.)
How can we measure growth over the very long run? Te poorest countries in the world have a per capita income of about $600 today. We can reason-ably assume that it is nearly impossible to live on an income below half this level (below $300). Per capita income in the United States in 2015 was about$51,000. With this information in mind, consider the following questions.(a) For how long is it possible that per capita income in the United Stateshas been growing at an average annual rate of 2% per year?(b) Some economists have argued that growth rates are mismeasured. Forexample, it may be difcult to compare per capita income today with percapita income a century ago when so many of the goods we can buy todaywere not available at any price then. Suppose the true growth rate in thepast century was 3% per year rather than 2%. What would the level of percapita income in 1800 have been in this case? Is this answer plausible?
Assume that a leader country has real GDP per capita of $80,000, whereas a follower country has real GDP per capita of $40,000. Next suppose that the growth of real GDP per capita falls to zero percent in the leader country and rises to 5 percent in the follower country. If these rates continue for long periods of time, how many years will it take for the follower country to catch up to the living standard of the leader country? Instructions: Enter your answer as a whole number. years