Comparison of the Four Structures: Compare the four industry structures based on quantity, price, profits, and price. (See Comparing Oligopoly Models.) Game Theory: The Prisoners’ Dilemma: Assume that the Wilson and Spalding athletic equipment companies are in a one-shot game for market share and profits, but that they have the option of choosing only one of two possible price strategies for basketballs: $20 or $80. Obviously if they choose different strategies, the firm with the lower price will win the entire market. The firms face the following payoff matrix (See Chap. 10). Wilson\\SpaldingWilson$ 20 PriceWilson$ 80 PriceSpalding$ 20 Price $ 400, $ 400 $ 1500, $ 0 Spalding$ 80 Price $ 0, $ 1500 $ 1000, $ 1000 What strategy will each firm choose? Why? Which strategy is dominant? Which strategy is preferred by each firm? What will be the outcome of the one-shot game? Where is the Nash equilibrium? Which outcome would be best for the two firms? What will happen if the game is repeated an infinite number of times?

The objective of the question is to understand the strategic decision-making process of the two…

Answered: Comparison of the Four Structures:…

Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies and Tactics (MindTap Course List)

14th Edition

ISBN:9781305506381

Author:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris

Publisher:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris

Chapter13: best-practice Tactics: Game Theory

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 3E

See similar textbooks

Related questions

Question

Comparison of the Four Structures: Compare the four industry structures based on quantity, price, profits, and price. (See Comparing Oligopoly Models.)

Game Theory: The Prisoners’ Dilemma: Assume that the Wilson and Spalding athletic equipment companies are in a one-shot game for market share and profits, but that they have the option of choosing only one of two possible price strategies for basketballs: $20 or $80. Obviously if they choose different strategies, the firm with the lower price will win the entire market. The firms face the following payoff matrix (See Chap. 10).

Wilson\

\Spalding

Wilson

$ 20 Price

Wilson

$ 80 Price

Spalding

$ 20 Price

$ 400, $ 400

$ 1500, $ 0

Spalding

$ 80 Price

$ 0, $ 1500

$ 1000, $ 1000

What strategy will each firm choose? Why? Which strategy is dominant? Which strategy is preferred by each firm? What will be the outcome of the one-shot game? Where is the Nash equilibrium? Which outcome would be best for the two firms? What will happen if the game is repeated an infinite number of times?

Definition Definition Economic decision-making framework that analyzes how different players optimize their outcomes with given pay-offs corresponding to their available strategies. The assumptions of game theory are: The number of players or competitors are finite/limited; All participants are rational The rules of the game are known to every player; and Each participant has a finite set of actions. A common way in which game theory is presented as an ( m x n ) matrix in which m represents the strategies of row player and n represents the strategies of column player. There are several limitations of game theory: Many businesses have a large number of competitors, and selecting an optimal strategy in these circumstances is difficult; Real-life business operating environments are full of uncertainty and difficult to model as a game theory; and The assumption of rationality and utility maximization isn't always an accurate portrayal of human nature.

AI-Generated Solution

AI-generated content may present inaccurate or offensive content that does not represent bartleby’s views.