Homework Help is Here – Start Your Trial Now!
Business
Economics
1. table below. Answer the following questions based on the regression Table 1. Regressions for per Capita Growth (1) (2) (3) (4) Dep. var. GR6085 GR7085 GR6085 GR6085 No. obs. 98 98 98 98 Const. 0.0302 0.0287 0.0288 0.0345 (0.0066) (0.0080) (0.0065) (0.0067) GDP60 -0.0075 -0.0089 -0.0073 -0.0068 (0.0012) (0.0016) (0.0011) (0.0009) SEC60 PRIM60 0.0305 (0.0079) 0.0250 (0.0056) 0.0331 0.0254 0.0133 (0.0137) (0.0110) (0.0070) 0.0276 0.0324 0.0263 (0.0070) (0.0077) (0.0060) SEC50 0.0183 (0.0121) PRIM50 -0.0085 (0.0064) gly -0.119 -0.142 -0.121 -0.094 (0.028) (0.034) (0.027) (0.026) REV -0.0195 -0.0236 -0.0189 -0.0167 (0.0063) (0.0071) (0.0060) (0.0062) ASSASS -0.0333 -0.0485 -0.0298 -0.0201 (0.0155) (0.0185) (0.0130) (0.0131) PP160DEV -0.0143 -0.0171 -0.0141 -0.0140 (0.0053) (0.0078) (0.0052) (0.0046) AFRICA -0.0114 (0.0039) LAT.AMER. -0.0129 (0.0030) 0.56 0.0128 0.49 0.0168 0.56 0.62 0.0129 0.0119 Source: Barro (1991), pp. 410-413. (a) The table shows the results of running a regression where the dependent (or left hand side) variable is a country's growth rate and the independent (or right hand side variables) are various factors that could affect the growth rate. The data used are cross-sectional (no time variation). I want to focus on the variable PRIM60, which is a measure of education (primary school enrollment in 1960). According to regression (1), what is the average effect of a one-unit increase in PRIM60 on a country's growth rate? (b) The numbers in parentheses are standard errors. Using this knowledge, write down which variables in regression (1) are statistically signifcant according to our 'rule of thumb' we learned in class. (c) Assume this is simply a cross-section regression with no use of difference-in- differences (obviously), IV, or any other of the techniques we discussed in class. Tell me a story about why we should be careful about interpreting the coefficient on PRIM60 as causal. I'm looking for a plausible story that would undermine a naive interpretation of the coefficient.

1. table below. Answer the following questions based on the regression Table 1. Regressions for per Capita Growth (1) (2) (3) (4) Dep. var. GR6085 GR7085 GR6085 GR6085 No. obs. 98 98 98 98 Const. 0.0302 0.0287 0.0288 0.0345 (0.0066) (0.0080) (0.0065) (0.0067) GDP60 -0.0075 -0.0089 -0.0073 -0.0068 (0.0012) (0.0016) (0.0011) (0.0009) SEC60 PRIM60 0.0305 (0.0079) 0.0250 (0.0056) 0.0331 0.0254 0.0133 (0.0137) (0.0110) (0.0070) 0.0276 0.0324 0.0263 (0.0070) (0.0077) (0.0060) SEC50 0.0183 (0.0121) PRIM50 -0.0085 (0.0064) gly -0.119 -0.142 -0.121 -0.094 (0.028) (0.034) (0.027) (0.026) REV -0.0195 -0.0236 -0.0189 -0.0167 (0.0063) (0.0071) (0.0060) (0.0062) ASSASS -0.0333 -0.0485 -0.0298 -0.0201 (0.0155) (0.0185) (0.0130) (0.0131) PP160DEV -0.0143 -0.0171 -0.0141 -0.0140 (0.0053) (0.0078) (0.0052) (0.0046) AFRICA -0.0114 (0.0039) LAT.AMER. -0.0129 (0.0030) 0.56 0.0128 0.49 0.0168 0.56 0.62 0.0129 0.0119 Source: Barro (1991), pp. 410-413. (a) The table shows the results of running a regression where the dependent (or left hand side) variable is a country's growth rate and the independent (or right hand side variables) are various factors that could affect the growth rate. The data used are cross-sectional (no time variation). I want to focus on the variable PRIM60, which is a measure of education (primary school enrollment in 1960). According to regression (1), what is the average effect of a one-unit increase in PRIM60 on a country's growth rate? (b) The numbers in parentheses are standard errors. Using this knowledge, write down which variables in regression (1) are statistically signifcant according to our 'rule of thumb' we learned in class. (c) Assume this is simply a cross-section regression with no use of difference-in- differences (obviously), IV, or any other of the techniques we discussed in class. Tell me a story about why we should be careful about interpreting the coefficient on PRIM60 as causal. I'm looking for a plausible story that would undermine a naive interpretation of the coefficient.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
14th Edition
ISBN:9780190931919
Author:NEWNAN
Publisher:NEWNAN
Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1QTC
See similar textbooks
icon
Related questions
Question
Help!
1. table below. Answer the following questions based on the regression Table 1. Regressions for per Capita Growth (1) (2) (3) (4) Dep. var. GR6085 GR7085 GR6085 GR6085 No. obs. 98 98 98 98 Const. 0.0302 0.0287 0.0288 0.0345 (0.0066) (0.0080) (0.0065) (0.0067) GDP60 -0.0075 -0.0089 -0.0073 -0.0068 (0.0012) (0.0016) (0.0011) (0.0009) SEC60 PRIM60 0.0305 (0.0079) 0.0250 (0.0056) 0.0331 0.0254 0.0133 (0.0137) (0.0110) (0.0070) 0.0276 0.0324 0.0263 (0.0070) (0.0077) (0.0060) SEC50 0.0183 (0.0121) PRIM50 -0.0085 (0.0064) gly -0.119 -0.142 -0.121 -0.094 (0.028) (0.034) (0.027) (0.026) REV -0.0195 -0.0236 -0.0189 -0.0167 (0.0063) (0.0071) (0.0060) (0.0062) ASSASS -0.0333 -0.0485 -0.0298 -0.0201 (0.0155) (0.0185) (0.0130) (0.0131) PP160DEV -0.0143 -0.0171 -0.0141 -0.0140 (0.0053) (0.0078) (0.0052) (0.0046) AFRICA -0.0114 (0.0039) LAT.AMER. -0.0129 (0.0030) 0.56 0.0128 0.49 0.0168 0.56 0.62 0.0129 0.0119 Source: Barro (1991), pp. 410-413. (a) The table shows the results of running a regression where the dependent (or left hand side) variable is a country's growth rate and the independent (or right hand side variables) are various factors that could affect the growth rate. The data used are cross-sectional (no time variation). I want to focus on the variable PRIM60, which is a measure of education (primary school enrollment in 1960). According to regression (1), what is the average effect of a one-unit increase in PRIM60 on a country's growth rate? (b) The numbers in parentheses are standard errors. Using this knowledge, write down which variables in regression (1) are statistically signifcant according to our 'rule of thumb' we learned in class. (c) Assume this is simply a cross-section regression with no use of difference-in- differences (obviously), IV, or any other of the techniques we discussed in class. Tell me a story about why we should be careful about interpreting the coefficient on PRIM60 as causal. I'm looking for a plausible story that would undermine a naive interpretation of the coefficient.
Transcribed Image Text:1. table below. Answer the following questions based on the regression Table 1. Regressions for per Capita Growth (1) (2) (3) (4) Dep. var. GR6085 GR7085 GR6085 GR6085 No. obs. 98 98 98 98 Const. 0.0302 0.0287 0.0288 0.0345 (0.0066) (0.0080) (0.0065) (0.0067) GDP60 -0.0075 -0.0089 -0.0073 -0.0068 (0.0012) (0.0016) (0.0011) (0.0009) SEC60 PRIM60 0.0305 (0.0079) 0.0250 (0.0056) 0.0331 0.0254 0.0133 (0.0137) (0.0110) (0.0070) 0.0276 0.0324 0.0263 (0.0070) (0.0077) (0.0060) SEC50 0.0183 (0.0121) PRIM50 -0.0085 (0.0064) gly -0.119 -0.142 -0.121 -0.094 (0.028) (0.034) (0.027) (0.026) REV -0.0195 -0.0236 -0.0189 -0.0167 (0.0063) (0.0071) (0.0060) (0.0062) ASSASS -0.0333 -0.0485 -0.0298 -0.0201 (0.0155) (0.0185) (0.0130) (0.0131) PP160DEV -0.0143 -0.0171 -0.0141 -0.0140 (0.0053) (0.0078) (0.0052) (0.0046) AFRICA -0.0114 (0.0039) LAT.AMER. -0.0129 (0.0030) 0.56 0.0128 0.49 0.0168 0.56 0.62 0.0129 0.0119 Source: Barro (1991), pp. 410-413. (a) The table shows the results of running a regression where the dependent (or left hand side) variable is a country's growth rate and the independent (or right hand side variables) are various factors that could affect the growth rate. The data used are cross-sectional (no time variation). I want to focus on the variable PRIM60, which is a measure of education (primary school enrollment in 1960). According to regression (1), what is the average effect of a one-unit increase in PRIM60 on a country's growth rate? (b) The numbers in parentheses are standard errors. Using this knowledge, write down which variables in regression (1) are statistically signifcant according to our 'rule of thumb' we learned in class. (c) Assume this is simply a cross-section regression with no use of difference-in- differences (obviously), IV, or any other of the techniques we discussed in class. Tell me a story about why we should be careful about interpreting the coefficient on PRIM60 as causal. I'm looking for a plausible story that would undermine a naive interpretation of the coefficient.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

SEE SOLUTIONCheck out a sample Q&A here
Blurred answer
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
Economics
ISBN:
9780190931919
Author:
NEWNAN
Publisher:
Oxford University Press
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134078779
Author:
Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:
PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134870069
Author:
William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:
PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:
9781305585126
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:
9781337106665
Author:
Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Economics
ISBN:
9781259290619
Author:
Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS