What Was The Impact Of The Crusades Dbq Essay

The Crusades was a horrific time. Many people had lost their lives, friends, even family. The Crusades were a battle over the holy land, Jerusalem. The Crusaders, people who had fought in the Crusades, were Christians. They wanted the holy land because they believe that’s where Jesus had died and rose. They had fought against the Muslims who were defending themselves against the Crusaders. The Crusades had its positive outcomes as well as its negative results. Some may wonder, were the results of the Crusades more Positive or Negative? I strongly believe the outcome was mostly negative mainly because the Crusaders didn’t win the holy land, lots of lands were destroyed, and so many people lost their lives in the battle of the Crusades.

One reason why the Crusades were more negative than positive was because they worsen their own relationship with the Jews and Muslims, or religious hatred, even tho they were bad anyways. Document 5 states that ”First, the long struggle between Islam and Christendom and the example of persecution set by Christian kings and prelates (bishops) left an inheritance of deep bitterness; relations between Muslims and their Christian and Jewish subjects worsened.” (description of some of the effects of the Crusades).This is (important/interesting/relevant) because even if the Christian and Muslims relationship was bad already the Crusades made it worse by the bitterness left and even the Jews now are in it because when the Crusades lost, they took their fury against the Jews and would slaughter and destroy their cities even though the lost against the Muslims. Document 10 states that “...which one of the Franks

Examples that the Crusades were more negative are going to be stated in the following reasons.Document 1 states that “ In the middle east,both Christians and Muslims committed appalling atrocities in name of religion.”Also in Europe the crusaders sometimes turned their madness towards the Jews and massacring entire communities.This is because important because it shows that the crusades was

The Crusades were a series of nine wars that began when Christians accumulated the first Crusaders to go and fight to take Jerusalem from the Muslims. But though the Crusades failed in their quest to conquer Jerusalem, there were positive and negative effects. However, it is evident in many ways the results were very damaging; in the way they impacted future relationships of Christians, Muslims, and Jews; and in how terrible the 4th Crusade ended up being.

The crusades were multiple religious wars between the muslims and the christians. The wars were very violent and they also destroyed and ruined many things. Were the results of the crusades more positive or negative.The crusades fought violent, bloody wars that were against that christians and the muslims. Document 1 states that the crusades were bitter because of the hatred to certain religions .This is (important) because the main part of the crusades was that they all started to take back jerusalem and they were also very racist. Document 7 states that crusade kingdoms were hard to manage because the crusading knights would abuse and commit other atrocities on other christians.This is relevant because they were hard to maintain because

One reason I think Crusades are more negative is that they would massacre innocent people. Document 1 states that “In Europe, Crusaders sometimes turned their fury against Jews, massacring communities.” This is relevant because the crusades put a bitter legacy of religious hatred behind them.Document 6 states that arriving in Constantinople in 1204, the Venetian, who had been hired to transport the Crusaders, and the

The war between two religions, christianity and islam took place between the eleventh century and the thirteenth century. This event was called the crusades. This event had many impacts, but were they good or bad? I think that it had a negative impact because it caused the churches to split, and the relationships of the religions was very negative.

Then they started to kill people because their hatred. Document 4 states that the negative impact on the Christians were that the buildings were burn. The library, churches, and more. The crusaders and the Venetians is the ones who destroyed thing on the christian land and they don’t know what to do with the crusaders and the Venetians who destroyed the land of the Christians. This is (important/interesting/relevant) because they were going to destroyed they building and tried to stop it.

The first crusades are initiated when Byzantine Emperor Alexius Comnenus requests help.The Crusades were holy wars fought between Christians in Europe and Muslims in the Middle East. The question being asked here is Were the results of the crusades more positive or negative.One reason the crusades happened on November 27, 1095, in Clermont, France, Pope Urban II called for a Crusade to help the Byzantines and to free the city of Jerusalem. Document the First Crusade states that The Crusaders first gathered in Constantinople in fall 1096.This is interesting because Document the First Crusade states that The official start date was set for August 15, 1096. Those armies that left before that time are considered

DBQ: Impact of the Crusades The crusades started when emperor Alexius Comnenus of the Western Byzantine Empire asked Pope Urban II from the Eastern Roman Empire for help to reconquer Asia Minor from the Seljuk Turks who were Muslims which were the Islamic Empire. On November 27, 1095 Pope Urban II made a speech for Christians to fight in the Crusades to get Jerusalem the Holy Land back. If they fought they would be forgiven for all their sins and if they died they would go to heaven. There were nine Crusades,the first crusade began in 1096 and the last crusade ended in 1291.

The Crusades were a fight for the Holy Land between Christians , Muslims and Jews. The Crusade left a very negative legacy because of the hatred and how they left all the land. The result of the Crusade came out more negative because how much land and historical things were destroyed. Document 4 states that a library and relics were destroyed in Constantinople.

In the end of the eleventh into the thirteenth century, there was a series of nine wars between the Muslims and the Christians. Together they are known as the Crusades. The Crusades started because the Christians wanted the Holy Land back from the Muslims. The question is, were the results of Crusades more good or bad? The results of the Crusades were definitely negative. The Crusades was more of a negative time because of the religious hatred and the split of the churches. The first few wars were about the religious hatred, and the last few were just for killing.

DBQ: Impact of the Crusades The crusades was a Holy war between the Christians and the Muslims. It started in Europe and because they wanted to free the Holy Land from Infidels. It sated in the year 1095. I think it is negative because it originally belonged to the Jews.

The Crusades was a battle between two religions, Christians and Muslims, during the eleventh century and went inside of the thirteenth century. A complex question that is trying to be determined is was the impact the crusades more positive or more negative. Through all of the problems the crusades caused such as destroying churches along with splitting them apart from one another and causing a hatred relationship between both religions the crusades were truly a unfavorable period of time. A cause for the Crusades being a negative time was because during the Crusades the churches that the religions went to and followed were being demolished as well as splitting them apart from one another.

There are many reasons for the crusades to be positive and negative. But the reasons of what the crusades effect was more negative than positive. This is because in the text it states “The crusades failed in their chief goal: the conquest of the holy land. They also left a bitter legacy of religious hatred behind them.” What this means is be the crusades left a negative effect of bitterness and hatred. Another reason in the text for why the crusades were negative is “In Europe, crusaders sometimes turned their fury against Jews, massacring entire communities.” This sentence means that people who took part in the crusades made careless decisions.