In the DBQ historical context, it states that “Between the end of the eleventh century and into the thirteenth century, European Christians, at the urging of the church, conducted a series of nine wars that have come to be known as the Crusades. Many people have wondered were the results of the Crusades more positive or negative? The results of the Crusades were more negative because they would massacre communities and empires, and they had very low patience. One reason I think Crusades are more negative is that they would massacre innocent people. Document 1 states that “In Europe, Crusaders sometimes turned their fury against Jews, massacring communities.” This is relevant because the crusades put a bitter legacy of religious hatred behind them.Document 6 states that arriving in Constantinople in 1204, the Venetian, who had been hired to transport the Crusaders, and the …show more content…
rushed once more on me and turned my face eastward, saying, “This is the way you should pray!” the Templars again came into him and expelled him.This is important because If you ever did something wrong you would have a punishment. Also, this proves that they had low patience because they didn't care they still expelled the man.Document 7 states that to make matters worse, the crusading knights often abused and committed atrocities against Eastern Orthodox Christians, Jews, and Muslims in the areas through which they passed.This is interesting because This also shows they weren't patient because they would do this since they had low money and had to depend on one group.These reasons make the crusades more negative because they weren't patient and if you ever disobeyed them you were more than likely to get punished. This led to them being known as awful and cruel people because of all the bad things they would
One reason the Crusades had a negative result is the amount of rancor the Christians had on the Muslims and the Muslims had on the Christians.
The Crusades were a failure in many ways. However, the Crusades also had many positive outcomes. These many outcomes included new ideas, better trade, and the revealing of the rest of the world. These all came from the Muslims along with a multitude of goods like cotton and the compass. Despite the all the fighting with Muslims, the Crusaders collected things from them and caused a step of evolution to occur. Life in Europe was now easier and longer thanks to the medicines and other things, until the trade frenzy brought a plague with no known cure. The trading ships brought mice/rats that had fleas carrying the Black Death or Black Plague. ⅓ of the population died leading up to the fall of the Manor system. All of this wouldn’t have occurred
Have you heard of the crusaders, and what they did for the holy land? Did the crusaders have a positive or negative effect on the world? Well, they mostly left a negative effect. It was negative because of their legacy, it was ruined by the way they tried to take the holy land. They had hatred for the Muslims, and because of the hatred they killed millions of people.
I think that the results of the crusades were negative because the setbacks they had with the muslims fighting back would hold them from conquering the empires.
Document states that, ”To make matters worse, the crusading knights often abused and committed atrocities against Eastern Orthodox Christians…” (Unknown 7).This is relevant to the turning of Christians
The crusades were a time of rough battle between the 11th and 13th century between Christians and Muslims which are two big religions now. Were the results of the crusades more positive or negative? The crusades were more negative than positive, here are the reasons why: Crusades failed their main goal of conquering the holy lands, Left a bitter legacy of hatred behind them, and both Muslims and Christians committed appalling atrocities. The crusades were more negative than positive because they failed their main goal of conquering the holy land instead ruined cities. Document 4 states that the Crusaders stormed and sacked the city of Constantinople ruining the magnificent library and stealing thousands of relics that were sold in Europe,
European Christians began a series of nine wars between the eleventh and thirteenth centuries known as the Crusades. The Christian crusades sought to reconquer the Holy Land of Jerusalem from the Muslims and had both a positive and negative impact on the Eastern and Western worlds. The positive effects of the Crusades were unexpected. The original goal of the Crusades was to repossess former Christian holy lands under Muslim rule in order to strengthen Christian Ideology throughout Europe.
There are many reasons why the crusades were awful to the ancient human times. There were many why the crusade had a terrible impact on the world, here is the first reason why. Document 1 states that The crusaders failed to achieve their goal which was to conquer the Holy Land and sometimes the crusaders turned their fury to the Jews. This is (important/interesting/relevant)
“For nine and a half centuries, the textbooks have repeated, almost word for word, with mechanical regularity, that the cause, or at least the immediate cause, of the Crusades was the Turkish conquest of the Near East, which they say constituted a very real threat to Christendom, that had to be countered by military action.” (Cahen)
Throughout the lifespan of the Catholic Church, many challenges have arisen which have caused the reputation of the church to be dismantled forcing the church to repair their credibility and reputation. Challenges of the Crusades that date back to 1096 to modern day paedophilia ring allegations. The Crusades were one of the most influential catholic wars. The Crusades were a series of religious wars between Christians and Muslims started primarily to secure control of holy sites considered sacred by both groups. In all, eight major Crusade expeditions occurred between 1096 and 1291. With an estimated death toll of 1-3 million, the Crusades are also one of the darkest parts of history. This essay will demonstrate the first, second and third Crusades, how they affected the catholic religion and how the issue was resolved/dealt with.
The Crusades were battles between European Christians and Muslims, they were fought at the holy land which is Jerusalem . The crusades started in 1095 and ended on 1291. It started because byzantium crumbled and The pope called western christians to take back the holy land. There were both positive and negative about the crusades.The real question is were the results of the crusades more positive or negative. What I have read and annotated I think there is more positive than negative.
The Crusades were a series of holy wars, they are characterised as taking vowels and granting indulgences to who participated in the crusades. The have fought against many cities, religions. The crusades left the legacy bitter and hatred behind them. It states in the D.B.Q packet “Christians and Muslims they committed appealing atrocities in the name of their religion, moreover turned their fury against the jews massacring the entire communities.” Mostly the Crusades were negative the always fought people, blamed people then they would kill them. They would join the Crusades just to kill people if they didn’t believe in god it was apparently wasn’t true the Pope would say that so they can't take over the city again. Those are the most main
Although the Crusades began from religious purposes, they also lead to the moderation of Europe. During the Crusades the people built on a part of land that is now known as Europe. The start of the Crusades was because the armies of Christians wanted to go to war against Muslim forces to get the power of the Holy Land. They wanted to get back the power of the Holy Land so they would become “Soldiers of Christ” said Pope Urban II. During this time they also were starting to have problems with the church, because very many of the churches people thought that they were learning the wrong ways of the church. In the period of the 13th century they had very many things going on leading to the Crusades and religious purposes.
There was an act of war between Muslims and Christians the two biggest religions today in the end of the eleventh century to the thirteenth century. This war was know as the Crusades. People have seen that the Crusades did have an positive effect on most people, Some also say it had an negative effect on them. So were the results of the Crusades more positive or negative? The Crusades were more negative because they had left hatred and bitterness behind them, and they had turned Christians against each other.
The crusades were a couple of wars between the christians and the muslims These wars are called The hCrusades.Do you think the crusades are more negative or more positive? Although someone might say that the crusades are more positive because you would get the holy land,it is clear that the outcome is more Negative than more Positive.