preview

Similarities Between Mengzi And Confucianism

Decent Essays

To begin, I’d like to say that one of the things that makes Mengzi stand out for me is the fact that he proposes that humans have an innate nature. He differs from a few philosophers (namely Gaozi) in the way that he thinks following an ethical code involves violating said innate nature. This must mean that Mengzi either thinks that humans are inherently good, or that it is possible for humans to possess an immoral nature while still being ethical. However, the latter would of course require humans to resist their nature, and as stated, Mengzi is against this. Humans should embrace their disposition as “good beings” and try their best not to stray from it. I have made it apparent in my writing about general Confucianism that I believe PGL have a strange way of getting to their point, but they manage to (barely, in some cases) skirt under the zone of being bogged down with their own inferences and liberties with each of the given texts they analyze. Put …show more content…

It is common across all translations that Mengzi thinks that it is not anyone’s fate to die “a criminal” or “in shackles”. This was something that I kept coming back to while reading these materials. Why would Mengzi think this? Why would it be so hard to believe that one’s fate was to die in chains? To expand on this, who was to be the judge on what was considered to be a criminal? For example, Mengzi always said that one should love their family; say that one’s family was wasting away from starvation? If the person in question were to steal some bread from a vendor and was thrown in prison and subsequently killed for it, what would the situation be? To the person’s family, they would be a hero. However, on the other hand, that same person would be a criminal in the eyes of the law. This must mean it is possible to die leaving mixed signals as your legacy - some think you were a martyr, while others think you are just another

Get Access