preview

Comparing Daoism And Legalism: Philosophies Used In Ancient China

Decent Essays

China Paper
There were many philosophies used in ancient china. However, there were three that are best known. These are Confucianism, Legalism, and Daoism, also spelled as Taoism. Each philosophy taught its own way to govern, and its own rules/way to live by. Though there are many differences between these three, there are also many similarities. For example, Both Taoism and Confucianism don’t require harsh laws to govern, while legalism encourages, and forces strong laws with harsh punishments.
Legalism was very different from the other philosophies. Its followers believed humans were born selfish and greedy and that there needed to be strict laws controlling the emperor’s people. Legalism was made by Hanfeizi, a Han prince. Hanfeizi believed that a ruler should use three tools to govern. Fa states that all the laws must be clearly written and put in a public place. Shu says that there must be secrets or tactics that prevent another person or people from taking the rule of the area. Shi, the third tool, states that the ruler or the emperor does not have the power, but rather it is the position that has power. …show more content…

It was almost the exact opposite. Taoism was created mainly by a man named Lao Tsu, but he didn’t make it himself. Lao Tsu originally made the philosophy, but multiple people added on to it. He was an emperor’s librarian during the Eastern Chou dynasty. Lao believed that if you followed everything life brought to you rather than try to change your life, you would create happiness for yourself and everything in life would be much simpler. Lao also believed that every living thing shared a single life force, and unbalanced caused illnesses. For this reason, Lao thought killing was wrong, as it would destroy some life force, possible causing unbalance. Emperors who followed Taoism believed that they should rule without laws, and take charge as little as possible, creating peace in the

Get Access