preview

Compare And Contrast Daoism And Confucionism

Good Essays

Between 1200 B.C.E. And 220 C.E. Many different political and social philosophies existed in China. These political and social philosophies had varying degrees of sucess in maintaining order in China. In this essay, I will be talking about Confucionism, Daoism, Legalism and how they affected China with varying degrees of sucess in promoting order. Daoism and Confucionism created order in China by focusing individual's goodness to promote order in society. Legalism on the other hand used a strict set of laws to promote order in society, with no form of religion. One of the most effective ways to promote order in Classical China, was that of mixing aspects of Legalism and Daosim.
One of the largest philosophical ideas in Classical China was that …show more content…

Daoism, unlike Confucionism, was not a philosophy "created" by one man. Instead it was likely a group of ideas from various peoople. Two of the main "creators" of Daoism are Laozi and Zhuangzi. Laozi was one of the first to talk about Daoism, and talked about it a few years before Zhuangzi did. Daoism existed around the same time as Confucionism and many followers knew about each of them. Daoism and Confucionism share some similarities: They both talk about the "Way". The "Way" was called dao by both Confucionism and Daosim. For Confucionism, dao meant doing rituals to bring out your inner humanity. For Daoism, it meant performing things such as meditating, breathing exercises, special diets, etc to control ones breathing and "life force". Daoists believed that if you could control that, you could gain "super powers" and in some cases immortality. Another similarity that Daoism shares with Confucianism is that neither of them talk about a higher being or the supernatural, and instead fous on human beings own inner goodness. While Daoism was not as popular as Budhism, it still promoted peace and order in Classical …show more content…

The Chinese philosophy of Legalism essentially said that there should be a strict set of rules for all things above all other rule. The encyclopedia Briticanna says this about Chinese Legalism: "Legalists believed that political institutions should be modeled in response to the realities of human behaviour and that human beings are inherently selfish and short-sighted...The Legalists advocated government by a system of laws that rigidly prescribed punishments and rewards for specific behaviours." (Legalism). Before the existence of legalism in China, everyone simply assumed that the next ruler would come from a family of nobles, and not that of peasants or of a lower class. Legalists, however, went against this idea. Legalists focused on the idea of meritcracy as a way for anyone of any class to rise to a higher position if they worked hard enough. Legalism, and variations of it, were wide spread throughout the Qin and Han empires. The biggest question about legalism is was it an effective form of ruling to prevent disorder in China? The Qin dynasty followed an exclusively legalistic law-set. The laws were created by the ruler, and they were not to be questioned by anyone. Historians described the laws of the Qin empire as extremely harsh. Partially due to just how harsh the legalistic laws of the Qin dynasty were, the Qin dynasty ended after only 14 years following a rebellion. In 206 BCE,

Get Access