preview

Bullying And The Multi-Method Approach

Decent Essays

While many are aware of the existence of bullying now, they still do not know the consequences resulting from this behavior. It is critical that we consider the damages inflicted on the victims, witnesses, and eventually onto the organization. Bartlett, and Bartlett (2011) gave a thorough analysis of the impacts—individual impacts can be considered in three groups: work, health, and affective domain. For individuals, the Clinical Psychology is relevant to understand the impact on physical, and mental well-being. At work, there is increased absenteeism, burnout, and income loss from working less hours. In terms of health, depression, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and suicides are the main issues. Although the victims are sick more often, …show more content…

The frequency and duration of bullying are two aspects to consider to make a definition for this behavior. Despite few decades of research, the researchers still have not agreed upon the extent of frequency and duration to define bullying. More on the definition, the values and norms of the workplace need to be included as these influence how the employees perceive bullying. Cowie et al. explored three methods—the insider’s experience on bullying, the outsider’s experience, and the multi-method approach of both inside and outside perspectives. The researchers recommend future psychologists to apply the multi-method approach to assess, and mediate the …show more content…

Glasø, Vie, Holmdal, and Einarsen (2010) utilized the AET as a theoretical frame of reference to assess the causes, and consequences of affective events at work. Despite this theory being commonly applied in studies on bullying, it has not been thoroughly tested. The theory involves work experiences triggering affective reactions, and influencing work attitudes. The work attitudes then trigger workplace behavior like turnover intention. This empirical paper conducted an anonymous questionnaire measuring bullying exposure, anger, anxiety, emotional experiences, job satisfaction, and turnover intention. Bullying reduced the victims’ job satisfaction, heightened the intentions to leave the organization, and this relationship was moderated by the victims’ affective experiences. The victims, having experienced bullying, would focus a lot on potential and ongoing threats from their surrounding environment. Thus, according to the Cognitive Psychology, they would be giving selective attention to their work. Human brains are difficult to attend to more than one event at a time, and as the victims have to process information from various sources, there would be less mental capacity to use on their job. The increased negative emotions, and lowered positive emotions from AET come in here, and make the individuals use a poor

Get Access