What class of motion, natural or violent, did Aristotle attribute to motion of the Moon?
The class of motion attributed to the Moon by Aristotle.
Answer to Problem 1RCQ
Solution: Natural Motion.
Explanation of Solution
According to Aristotle, if the motion of an object requires a force to make it move, it as an unnatural motion. On the other hand, if an object faces motion without being forced, it is classified as a natural motion.
Aristotle divided motion into two types:
- Natural Motion: Under this motion, the natural position of an object is at rest. The object is attracted to the center of the earth. The heavier the object is, the stronger will be the force. In this kind of motion, there are two forces, they are an upward and downward force. For example, a stone falling on the ground.
- Violent motion: Under this motion, the motion is imposed on the object. This means that an external push or pull force is applied fall in this category. For example, horse pulling a cart.
According to Aristotle, the Moon and stars − are embedded in perfectly concentric Crystal sphere" that rotate eternally at fixed rates, so the motion of the Moon come under the category of natural motion.
Conclusion:
The class of motion attributed to Moon by Aristotle was Natural motion.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 2 Solutions
Conceptual Physics (12th Edition)
Additional Science Textbook Solutions
University Physics with Modern Physics (14th Edition)
Applied Physics (11th Edition)
The Cosmic Perspective (8th Edition)
College Physics: A Strategic Approach (4th Edition)
Conceptual Integrated Science
- According to the principles of Aristotle, what part of the motion of a baseball pitched across home plate is natural motion? What part is violent motion?arrow_forwardRefer to the information in Soccer Player to answer this question. The sum of the x components is 6 m 46 m 26 m –46 marrow_forwardOn question 2, what would be the right answer?arrow_forward
- Please provide justificationarrow_forwardWhen the Earth passes a planet such as Mars, the planet appears to move backward for a time, a phenomenon known as retrograde motion. Ancient astronomers believed that the Earth did not move and that the planets moved around the Earth. They also believed that uniform circular motion was perfect and that heavenly objects such as planets exhibited this perfect motion. How do you suppose ancient astronomers accounted for retrograde motion? Include a sketch with your explanation.arrow_forwardThis is a sequential question. The first three parts have been answered. Please kindly help solve the last one (d)arrow_forward
- Foundations of Astronomy (MindTap Course List)PhysicsISBN:9781337399920Author:Michael A. Seeds, Dana BackmanPublisher:Cengage LearningStars and Galaxies (MindTap Course List)PhysicsISBN:9781337399944Author:Michael A. SeedsPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Glencoe Physics: Principles and Problems, Student...PhysicsISBN:9780078807213Author:Paul W. ZitzewitzPublisher:Glencoe/McGraw-HillPhysics for Scientists and Engineers: Foundations...PhysicsISBN:9781133939146Author:Katz, Debora M.Publisher:Cengage Learning