What are the schools of thought in comparative politics? Discuss briefly the schools of thought in comparative politics.

Social Psychology (10th Edition)
10th Edition
ISBN:9780134641287
Author:Elliot Aronson, Timothy D. Wilson, Robin M. Akert, Samuel R. Sommers
Publisher:Elliot Aronson, Timothy D. Wilson, Robin M. Akert, Samuel R. Sommers
Chapter1: Introducing Social Psychology
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1RQ1
icon
Related questions
Question

What are the schools of thought in comparative politics?
Discuss briefly the schools of thought in comparative politics.

 

 

 
Schools of Analysis
Three of the most prominent schools in comparative politics in the past 50 years have
been political economy, modernization theory, and dependency theory. They are chosen here
only to give you an idea of the sharply different perspectives that exist in comparative politics.
The political economy approach emphasizes, as its name suggests, the nexus between economy
and politics. A classic case is Robert Bates's States and Markets in Tropical Africa: The Political
Basis of Agricultural Policy (University of California Press, 1981), in which the author examines
how state economic policy in Africa, especially in agriculture, undermines development, and
why policy continues in light of failure. Political economy, in turn, is composed of subschools,
among them rational choice theory, which attempts to use (neoclassical) economic reasoning to
explain collective decisions.
Like political economy, modernization theory focuses on domestic forces, but its concern is more
about how certain cultural aspects that retard development may be overcome. Modernization
theory generally divides society between a "modern" sector and a "backward" sector. The
challenge of development is how to overcome the latter. In addition, modernization theory tends
to emphasize culture rather than the political economy, which it sees as a dependent variable to
be acted upon. Still, the units of analysis in both schools are nation-states, and their levels of
analysis, although different, are internal to the units.
The same cannot be said of dependency theory, for which the global system, not nation-states, is
the focus of analysis. In dependency theory, poverty is due to neither so-called backward culture
nor deleterious state actions in the political economy but rather the global system itself; a
relatively small number of "core" countries specialize in high-value-added manufactured goods,
while a large number of "peripheral" countries specialize in primary commodity production.
Thus poverty in dependency theory stems from the position countries occupy in the international
division of labor or system.
Transcribed Image Text:Schools of Analysis Three of the most prominent schools in comparative politics in the past 50 years have been political economy, modernization theory, and dependency theory. They are chosen here only to give you an idea of the sharply different perspectives that exist in comparative politics. The political economy approach emphasizes, as its name suggests, the nexus between economy and politics. A classic case is Robert Bates's States and Markets in Tropical Africa: The Political Basis of Agricultural Policy (University of California Press, 1981), in which the author examines how state economic policy in Africa, especially in agriculture, undermines development, and why policy continues in light of failure. Political economy, in turn, is composed of subschools, among them rational choice theory, which attempts to use (neoclassical) economic reasoning to explain collective decisions. Like political economy, modernization theory focuses on domestic forces, but its concern is more about how certain cultural aspects that retard development may be overcome. Modernization theory generally divides society between a "modern" sector and a "backward" sector. The challenge of development is how to overcome the latter. In addition, modernization theory tends to emphasize culture rather than the political economy, which it sees as a dependent variable to be acted upon. Still, the units of analysis in both schools are nation-states, and their levels of analysis, although different, are internal to the units. The same cannot be said of dependency theory, for which the global system, not nation-states, is the focus of analysis. In dependency theory, poverty is due to neither so-called backward culture nor deleterious state actions in the political economy but rather the global system itself; a relatively small number of "core" countries specialize in high-value-added manufactured goods, while a large number of "peripheral" countries specialize in primary commodity production. Thus poverty in dependency theory stems from the position countries occupy in the international division of labor or system.
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

Blurred answer
Recommended textbooks for you
Social Psychology (10th Edition)
Social Psychology (10th Edition)
Sociology
ISBN:
9780134641287
Author:
Elliot Aronson, Timothy D. Wilson, Robin M. Akert, Samuel R. Sommers
Publisher:
Pearson College Div
Introduction to Sociology (Eleventh Edition)
Introduction to Sociology (Eleventh Edition)
Sociology
ISBN:
9780393639407
Author:
Deborah Carr, Anthony Giddens, Mitchell Duneier, Richard P. Appelbaum
Publisher:
W. W. Norton & Company
The Basics of Social Research (MindTap Course Lis…
The Basics of Social Research (MindTap Course Lis…
Sociology
ISBN:
9781305503076
Author:
Earl R. Babbie
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Criminalistics: An Introduction to Forensic Scien…
Criminalistics: An Introduction to Forensic Scien…
Sociology
ISBN:
9780134477596
Author:
Saferstein, Richard
Publisher:
PEARSON
Sociology: A Down-to-Earth Approach (13th Edition)
Sociology: A Down-to-Earth Approach (13th Edition)
Sociology
ISBN:
9780134205571
Author:
James M. Henslin
Publisher:
PEARSON
Society: The Basics (14th Edition)
Society: The Basics (14th Edition)
Sociology
ISBN:
9780134206325
Author:
John J. Macionis
Publisher:
PEARSON