BUSINESS STRATEGIES An organisation’s business model is and is consisted in the essence of its existence. In the globalised environment of a market economy, it is fundamental that management leads the organisation in defining and designing an approach to the future that is tailored to and complements the organisation’s profile, exploring creative possibilities that can leverage organisational uniqueness and ensuring alignment of “strategic intent” and “strategic mission” to keep stakeholders interested and realise business bottom-line. This paper will attempt to highlight the findings of some points of common ground between Microsoft and Red Hat, and show where and how they differ in their respective business strategies. In addition, …show more content…
Gates (n.d.) stated that Microsoft’s vision is to make its continued innovative technologies accessible to everyone. From this comes Microsoft’s mission to facilitate the realisation of potential by individuals and groups (businesses, etc.) around the globe. To realise its vision and achieve its mission, according to Microsoft.com (2005) the company employed the following strategies: I. “Global Citizenship”, which involves: A. Opportunities for education and software access, partnership developments and responsible business practices in communities around the globe. B. Technology innovation and access – research, development and partnership for access to technology in spite of apparent economic or geographical barriers. C. Protection, which entails virtual protection of privacy for the individual, group and hardware. II. Corporate Responsibility, which involves: A. Being a responsible employer B. Stakeholder engagement for good relationship C. Being a responsible leader in the industry D. Manage supply chain According to Microsoft.com (n.d.) the company also takes a strategic approach to realising its vision and achieving its mission by: I. Making accessibility a theme of research, development and testing II. Making the computer prominent Red Hat The
Some of the advantages of selecting each vendor’s product are similar and still somewhat distinct. Red Hat in (For sap business,) states, “that is a responsive customer support, higher performance standards, collaborative engineering for better products, and designed-in security.” Customer support is a very important advantage. Higher performance standards are also an important advantage. Higher performance means we will get what we paid for or more in our return. According to (Stevens, 2011) there are several pros and cons to using Red Hat. Some of the advantages are its scalability in the processors and memory, ability for hot-swapping of processors, and an integrated KVM virtualization with Kernel Samepage Merging and SELinux sandbox options. Some of the cons of Red Hat are its server
Microsoft operates in many geographic locations around the world and are behind the world’s most popular desktop operating system in the world. Microsoft is primarily a software company but have flexed their arms into internet services and are behind certain products in consumer market which is directly against Google. Microsoft’s market includes end-customers, enterprises and institutions just like Google. Some of the key Microsoft products are Bing which is a search engine just like Google.com and Microsoft ad center which is a direct
-The main function of the Microsoft is Endorsement on all offerings, Example like press conference, game studio, hardware, certified partner and executive circle
This essay plans to focus on the corporate strategy of Microsoft, and show how Microsoft has used diversification successfully within their corporate strategy to gain a competitive advantage.
Mr. Gates’ also explains how Microsoft tackled the challenge of integrating the Internet to be compatible with various Microsoft products. The biggest dilemmas were determining what should be incorporated into the existing Microsoft products, what should be packaged as new products, and how should the Windows Operating System support the Internet. He gives frequent examples of how the other competing computer industry giants were able to succeed in the computer industry. A lot of success he points out was made through trial and error as well as learning from one’s mistakes. He talks about how Microsoft has learned from projects that have failed such as the Multiplan spreadsheet that went on to be developed into Microsoft Excel, and the Omega database that would become Microsoft Access. One suggestion that Mr. Gates makes in achieving company success is by
A company’s mission statement specifies how the firm intends to compete and serve their customers (Hitt, Ireland, Hoskisson, 2013, p.18). The vision and mission provide the foundation for an organization’s strategies (Hitt et al., 2013, p. 18). The company’s objectives should be inspiring and relevant to all their stakeholders (p.18). Ford’s vision statement addresses the concerns of their stakeholders and their ability to enhance the firm’s
Microsoft Corporation is one of the largest and most influential companies in the personal computer industry. It has won several awards for innovation, for their commitment to diversity, and for their flexible work arrangements. It has always been a leader in the market with regard to its compensation. With 80,0004 employees across the world, having more than $15 billion revenue, it is one of the biggest and best‐known technology companies in the world.
“Microsoft aspires to be a great company, and our success depends on you. It depends on people who innovate and are committed to growing our business responsibly. People who dedicate themselves to really satisfying customers, helping partners, and improving the communities in which we do business. People who are accountable for achieving big, bold goals with unwavering integrity. People who are leaders, who appreciate that to be truly great, we must continually strive to do better ourselves and help others improve.”
in order to create possibly the most effective and versatile workforce of any corporation in existence. To study Microsoft's way of doing business is to look at the company from many angles, from a managerial and organizational standpoint to its process of developing products and services for its customers and its competitive environment. The purpose of this paper is to analyze Microsoft from a strategic fit
Microsoft Corporation is one of the largest and most influential companies in the personal computer industry. It has won several awards for innovation, for their commitment to diversity, and for their flexible work arrangements. It has always been a leader in the market with regard to its compensation. With 80,0004 employees across the world, having more than $15 billion revenue, it is one of the biggest and best‐known technology companies in the world.
This paper analyzes and compares the differences between the Windows and Linux’s operating system in an enterprise. It emphasizes the features in these two operating system such as history, cost, security, user-friendliness, performance, and future trends. It shows how impactful these features can be when an enterprise chooses an operating system. The research in this paper highlights the pros and cons of an enterprise using one operating system or the other. It directs the readers to have a better understanding on which operating system is better for specific instances. Readers will have an enhance perception on Windows and Linux and the platforms they serve. In our paper we try to fully analyze Windows and Linux’s operating system, so an enterprise can choose the best operating system for themselves.
Three operating systems discuss in this paper each have their advantages and disadvantages from one another. The biggest advantage for Microsoft is the widespread use and compatibility with most every type of program out there. If you 're a Linux fan then you appreciate not only the price which is usually free but also that it is
Microsoft's stated mission statement is "to help people and businesses throughout the world realize their full potential." Arguably, a statement this vague provides so little sense of mission that it lacks value. That is the point. Microsoft cannot even uphold its own mission internally, given the gap between the company's potential and the company's output. That the company has no coherent, tangible sense of its own mission is a contributing factor to that failure. Consider the company's resources. As Clarke (2010) notes, it is not for lack of ideas that Microsoft has failed to innovate. The company has great people, highly-talented, educated and experienced. It has $66 billion in cash on its balance sheet and another $10 billion in long-term investments (MSN Moneycentral, 2012). Clarke (2010) notes that the company spends $9 billion per year on research and development. The potential for innovation at Microsoft, then, is tremendous, yet its output is minimal.
This mission must take into account and balance the present with the uncertain future. It is an important administrative task for a manager’s mission to strive for the company’s full potential. As Drucker states, “What is the business’s theoretical optimum? What prevents us from attaining it? Where are the limiting and restraining factors that hold back the business and deprive it of the full return on its resources and efforts”? (32). Determining and adapting a productive mission requires a manager to be an entrepreneur, a risk taker, and an innovator. A good company mission is adaptable, and will allow the modern business to survive and perform in a new and unpredictable future.
Microsoft was founded in 1975, and is the worldwide leader in software, services, and solutions (Career). Microsoft is proud to offer great products and employ outstanding people. Previous Microsoft CEO, Steve Ballmer once said, “There are many things that are true about Microsoft. We have big goals, big dreams, and big aspirations for the future. We are both competitive with our products and in the way we attract and retain talent. For me, the most important factor is competition for talent, because I know our success comes from the people who work here” (Foley).