Linguistics

Introduction: Linguistic relativity is the notion that language can affect our thought processes, and is often referred to as the ‘Sapir-Whorf hypothesis’, after the two linguists who brought the idea into the spotlight. Whorf writes how “Language is not merely a reproducing instrument for voicing ideas but rather is itself the shaper of ideas, the program and guide for the individual’s mental activity” (1956:212), and I will explain how it is able to do so. In this essay I will argue that certain

Cognitive Linguistics is a new approach to the study of language which views linguistic knowledge as part of general cognition and thinking. It emerged through the work of George Lakoff and Ronald Langacker and considers that linguistic behavior is not separated from other general cognitive abilities which allow mental processes of reasoning or memory but understood as an integral part of it. According to Lakoff and Johnson, there is a conceptual potential that enables the transferring of the knowledge

Originally, linguistics was my intended major. Recently, I decided to switch my major to anthropology, and more specifically, the field of linguistic anthropology. For the linguistics major, one of my requirements for transferring to a university was to take a language and culture class. Several of the first lectures focused on the history of linguistics and anthropology. I was introduced to the idea that language, thought, and culture all influence each other. This meant that studying language

The author’s main argument in “Literacy, Discourse, and Linguistics” is that the focus of literacy studies or applied linguistics should be social practices (Discourse) rather than language. Many people tend to think of language as ‘perfect grammar’, but language is about what you say, how you say it, what you are, and do when you say something. Gee elaborates on this claim by describing two responses of women in an interview that each show different dialect. Overall, the saying-doing-being-valuing-believing

Survey design can raise issues that can traverse the cultural and linguistic boundaries and influence the survey questions selection and procedure. These issues can become more pressing and critical especially when surveys are conducted in support of vital entities such as government policies, program evaluations, human rights investigations and government policies. Survey accommodation to certain cultures and languages is an issue of importance and significance. There are logical reasons for these

On the contrary, teachers may leave University with extensive theoretical knowledge about linguistics but it can be sometimes seem far removed from the real concrete situations they face in the field; and just one practical case they have to deal with may give them more insight into a problem and its solutions than any amount of theoretical understanding. In this sense, it is noteworthy that much of linguistics today is corpus-based. Which means that the theories actually come from studying "real

Corpus linguistics Corpus Linguistics (CL) is a method of operating linguistic analysis (McEnery & Wilson, 2001, p1) that “facilitates empirical descriptions of language use” (Biber, 2011, p15). This method is based on analysis of ‘Corpus’ ,which is a sample of different kinds of texts, such as newspaper texts, or specifically editorials, video scripts, everyday conversation and many other types of written language (Baker, 2012, p248). Corpus Linguistics tries to establish a balanced corpus _Latin

INTRODUCTION Although language and linguistics have differences, they interact with each other via significance, influence and implications shared through language teaching. Linguistics is the scientific study of language which is composed of sound and speech sound, and is concerned with how language is structured, how language is changed, how people use the language and what they must know in order to do so. In the 19th century, the focus of linguistics was more about writing than speaking,

Heteroglossia - Langue and linguistic variation Bakhtin developed the notion in contrast with the structuralist account of language, which was centered in the notion of langue, that is, the systematic set of rules determining the well-formedness of an expression or utterance. This concept, introduced by Saussure, emphasised the notion that the code conformed by the linguistic norms must be common to all speakers for communication to be possible. This was seen as a dangerous simplification by Bakhtin

house, of the first and second cause – ah, the immortal passata, the punta reiversa, the hai!” (II. iii. 18-24) Concentrating on Mercutio’s third sentence here beginning, “He fights as you sing prick- / song…” this paper will explore how various linguistic devices, including metaphor, a number of rhetorical figures, and parody come together in this effusive and highfalutin description of Tybalt’s fighting style to convey important information about Mercutio’s character, Tybalt’s fighting style, and