The enormous budget deficits of 2009 through 2011 meant that the federal government was borrowing upwards of $1.5 trillion per year. If that borrowing had limited the ability of the private sector to get financial capital for its purposes, economists would call this crowding out. There was O significant evidence this was a problem because interest rates were very high. O little evidence this was a problem because interest rates were very low. O significant evidence this was a problem because interest rates were very low. O little evidence this was a problem because interest rates were very high.

The enormous budget deficits of 2009 through 2011 meant that the federal government was borrowing upwards of $1.5 trillion per year. If that borrowing had limited the ability of the private sector to get financial capital for its purposes, economists would call this crowding out. There was O significant evidence this was a problem because interest rates were very high. O little evidence this was a problem because interest rates were very low. O significant evidence this was a problem because interest rates were very low. O little evidence this was a problem because interest rates were very high.

Brief Principles of Macroeconomics (MindTap Course List)

8th Edition

ISBN:9781337091985

Author:N. Gregory Mankiw

Publisher:N. Gregory Mankiw

Chapter18: Six Debates Over Macroeconomic Policy

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 6PA

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Under what general macroeconomic circumstances might a government use expansionary fiscal policy? When might it use contractionary fiscal policy?
What is the main advantage of automatic stabilizers over discretionary fiscal policy?
What would happen if expansionary fiscal policy was implemented in a recession but, due to lag, did not actually take effect until after the economy was back to potential GDP?
Explain how automatic stabilizers work, both on the taxation side and on the spending side, first in a situation where the economy is producing less than potential GDP and then in a situation where the economy Is producing more than potential GDP.
In a recession, does the actual budget surplus or deficit fall above or below the standardized employment budget?
Explain whether or not you agree with the premise of the Ricardian equivalence theory that rational people might reason: Well, a higher budget deficit (surplus) means that Im just going to owe more (less) taxes In the future to pay off all that government borrowing, so Ill start saving (spending) now. Why or why not?
What is the main reason for employing contractionary fiscal policy in a time of strong economic growth?
Assume there is no discretionary increase in government spending. Explain how an improving economy will affect the budget balance and, in turn, investment and the trade balance.
If a government runs a budget deficit of 10 billion dollars each year for ten years, then a surplus of 1 billion for five years, and then a balanced budget for another ten years, what is the government debt?
Under what condition would crowding out not inhibit long-run economic growth? Under what condition would crowding out impede long-run economic growth?