Suppose Charles and Dina are playing a game in which both must simultaneously choose the action Left or Right. The payoff matrix that follows showsthe payoff each person will earn as a function of both of their choices. For example, the lower-right cell shows that if Charles chooses Right and Dinachooses Right, Charles will receive a payoff of 5 and Dina will receive a payoff of 3.DinaLeftRightLeft4, 46, 3CharlesRight5, 45, 3The only dominant strategy in this game is forto chooseThe outcome reflecting the unique Nash equilibrium in this game is as follows: Charles choosesand Dina chooses

The Nash equilibrium is a game theory decision-making theorem that argues that if a player sticks to…

Suppose Charles and Dina are playing a game in which both must simultaneously choose the action Left or Right. The payoff matrix that follows sh the payoff each person will earn as a function of both of their choices. For example, the lower-right cell shows that if Charles chooses Right and Dit chooses Right, Charles will receive a payoff of 5 and Dina will receive a payoff of 3. Dina Left Right Left 4, 4 6, 3 Charles Right 5, 4 5, 3 The only dominant strategy in this game is for to choose The outcome reflecting the unique Nash equilibrium in this game is as follows: Charles chooses and Dina chooses

Suppose Charles and Dina are playing a game in which both must simultaneously choose the action Left or Right. The payoff matrix that follows sh the payoff each person will earn as a function of both of their choices. For example, the lower-right cell shows that if Charles chooses Right and Dit chooses Right, Charles will receive a payoff of 5 and Dina will receive a payoff of 3. Dina Left Right Left 4, 4 6, 3 Charles Right 5, 4 5, 3 The only dominant strategy in this game is for to choose The outcome reflecting the unique Nash equilibrium in this game is as follows: Charles chooses and Dina chooses

Microeconomic Theory

12th Edition

ISBN:9781337517942

Author:NICHOLSON

Publisher:NICHOLSON

Chapter8: Game Theory

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 8.7P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Suppose Edison and Hilary are playing a game in which both must simultaneously choose the action Left or Right. The payoff matrix that follows shows the payoff each person will earn as a function of both of their choices. For example, the lower-right cell shows that Edison chooses Right and Hilary chooses Right, Edison will receive a payoff of 3 and Hilary will receive a payoff of 7. Hilary Left Right Left 4, 6 6, 8 Edison Right 7, 5 3, 7 The only dominant strategy in this game is for to choose The outcome reflecting the unique Nash equilibrium in this game is as follows: Edison chooses and Hilary chooses
Suppose Carlos and Deborah are playing a game in which both must simultaneously choose the action Left or Right. The payoff matrix that follows shows the payoff each person will earn as a function of both of their choices. For example, the lower-right cell shows that if Carlos chooses Right and Deborah chooses Right, Carlos will receive a payoff of 6 and Deborah will receive a payoff of 5. Deborah Left Right Carlos Left 8, 4 4, 5 Right 5, 4 6, 5 The only dominant strategy in this game is for to choose . The outcome reflecting the unique Nash equilibrium in this game is as follows: Carlos chooses and Deborah chooses .
Suppose Andrew and Beth are playing a game in which both must simultaneously choose the action Left or Right. The payoff matrix that follows shows the payoff each person will earn as a function of both of their choices. For example, the lower-right cell shows that if Andrew chooses Right and Beth chooses Right, Andrew will receive a payoff of 5 and Beth will receive a payoff of 5. Beth Left Right 6, 6 Right 4, 3 Left 6, 3 Andrew 5, 5 The only dominant strategy in this game is for to choose The outcome reflecting the unique Nash equilibrium in this game is as follows: Andrew chooses and Beth chooses
Suppose Antonio and Trinity are playing a game that requires both to simultaneously choose an action: Up or Down. The payoff matrix that follows shows the earnings of each person as a function of both of their choices. For example, the upper-right cell shows that if Antonio chooses Up and Trinity chooses Down, Antonio will receive a payoff of 7 and Trinity will receive a payoff of 5. Trinity Up Down Up 4,8 7,5 Antonio Down 3,2 5,6 In this game, the only dominant strategy is for to choose The outcome reflecting the unique Nash equilibrium in this game is as follows: Antonio chooses, and Trinity chooses Grade It Now Save & Continue Continue without saving @ 2 F2 #3 80 Q F3 MacBook Air 44 F7 Dll F8 44 F10 74 $ 4 05 Λ & % 5 6 7 8 * 0 Q W E R T Y U 1 A N S X 9 0 -O O D F G H J K L on را H command C > B N M Λ - - P [ H Λ command opti
Suppose Yakov and Ana are playing a game in which both must simultaneously choose the action Left or Right. The payoff matrix that follows shows. the payoff each person will earn as a function of both of their choices. For example, the lower-right cell shows that if Yakov chooses Right and Ana chooses Right, Yakov will receive a payoff of 6 and Ana will receive a payoff of 6. Yakov Left Left 2,3 Right 3,7 Ana Right 4,4 6,6 The only dominant strategy in this game is for to choose The outcome reflecting the unique Nash equilibrium in this game is as follows: Yakov chooses and Ana chooses
Consider the following game. You will roll a fair, 6-sided die either once or twice. You decide whether to do the second roll after you see how the first one lands. The payoff is $n, where n is the outcome of the last roll. For example, if the first roll lands 4 and the second lands 2, you win $2. If you only do one roll and it lands 4, you win $4. Suppose you make your decision about whether to go for a second roll based on expected monetary value. Then you will go for a second roll if (and only if) the first roll lands x or lower. What is x?
Consider the following game. There are two payers, Player 1 and Player 2. Player 1 chooses a row (10, 20, or 30), and Player 2 chooses a column (10/20/30). Payoffs are in the cells of the table, with those on the left going to Player 1 and those on the right going to player 2. Suppose that Player 1 chooses his strategy (10, 20 or 30), first, and subsequently, and after observing Player 1’s choice, Player 2 chooses his own strategy (of 10, 20 or 30). Which of the following statements is true regarding this modified game? I. It is a simultaneous move game, because the timing of moves is irrelevant in classifying games.II. It is a sequential move game, because Player 2 observes Player 1’s choice before he chooses his own strategy.III. This modification gives Player 1 a ‘first mover advantage’. A) I and IIB) II and IIIC) I and IIID) I onlyE) II only
Consider a sequential game where there are two players, Jake and Sydney. Jake really likes Sydney and is hoping to run in to her at a party this weekend. Sydney can't stand Jake. There are two parties going on this weekend and each player's payoffs are a function of whether they see one another at the party. The payoff matrix is as follows: Sydney Party 1 Party 2 Party 1 6, 18 18, 6 Jake Party 2 24,8 0,24 a) Does this game have a pure strategy Nash Equilibrium? b) What is the mixed strategy Nash Equilibrium? c) Now suppose Sydney decides what party she is going to first. Her roommate is friends with Jake and will call him to tell him which party they go to. Write the extensive form of this game (game tree). d) What is the subgame perfect Nash equilibrium from part c?
Consider the following two-player game.First, player 1 selects a number x≥0. Player 2 observes x. Then, simultaneously andindependently, player 1 selects a number y1 and player 2 selects a number y2, at which pointthe game ends.Player 1’s payoff is: u1(x; y1) = −3y21 + 6y1y2 −13x2 + 8xPlayer 2’s payoff is: u2(y2) = 6y1y2 −6y22 + 12xy2Draw the game tree of this game and identify its Subgame Perfect Nash Equilibrium.
The following table shows the payoff matrix that represents the strategic interaction between two classmates, Amelie and Brianna. They are deciding which Scottish island to visit on a day trip. Brianna Kerrera Cumbrae Amelie Kerrera 5, 2 1, 1 Cumbrae 3, 3 3, 5 a. Amelie likes Kerrera more than Cumbrae, conditional on both choosing the same island b. In a sequential game where Brianna can move first, Amelie would choose to visit Cumbrae c. In a one-shot, simultaneous game, both Amelie and Brianna will choose to visit Kerrera since their total happiness would be the highest d. There are two Nash equilibria
Suppose Rashard and Alyssa are playing a game that requires both to simultaneously choose an action: Up or Down. The payoff matrix that follows shows the earnings of each person as a function of both of their choices. For example, the upper-right cell shows that if Rashard chooses Up and Alyssa chooses Down, Rashard will receive a payoff of 4 and Alyssa will receive a payoff of 5. Alyssa Up Down Rashard Up 8, 4 4, 5 Down 5, 4 6, 5 In this game, the only dominant strategy is for to choose . The outcome reflecting the unique Nash equilibrium in this game is as follows: Rashard chooses and Alyssa chooses.
5. A game of Chicken is played by two lorry drivers who speed toward a narrow bridge. If one driver stops to let the other pass, they waste time, whereas the one who does not stop gets to their destination quicker. However, if both keep driving straight on then they crash. The game is played once, and drivers move simultaneously. Payoffs are given below (assume 0 < x < 10): Drive Stop Drive -10,-10 -x, 8 Stop 8,-1 0,0 (a) Find any pure strategy Nash equilibria of this game. (b) Find the mixed strategy Nash equilibrium of this game. (c) What happens to the column player's equilibrium mixed strategy as x increases? Explain why this happens. (d) Let x = 1. What are the rationalizable outcomes of this game? Do these offer a better prediction than the Nash equilibria?