Robert uses a portion of Eric's property in such a manner that he's five years away from adversely possessing the property. Eric sells his property to Kelsey. The effect on the possible adverse possession is: Question 1 options: it cancels the possible adverse possession claim nothing, but only if Robert has told Kelsey of the possible adverse possession of the property nothing, but only if Robert has told Kelsey of the possible adverse possession claim AND Eric consents it starts the running of the clock for adverse possession all over again nothing

icon
Related questions
Question
Robert uses a portion of Eric's property in such a manner that he's five years away from adversely
possessing the property. Eric sells his property to Kelsey. The effect on the possible adverse possession is:
Question 1 options:
it cancels the possible adverse possession claim
nothing, but only if Robert has told Kelsey of the possible adverse possession of the property
nothing, but only if Robert has told Kelsey of the possible adverse possession claim AND Eric consents
it starts the running of the clock for adverse possession all over again
nothing
Transcribed Image Text:Robert uses a portion of Eric's property in such a manner that he's five years away from adversely possessing the property. Eric sells his property to Kelsey. The effect on the possible adverse possession is: Question 1 options: it cancels the possible adverse possession claim nothing, but only if Robert has told Kelsey of the possible adverse possession of the property nothing, but only if Robert has told Kelsey of the possible adverse possession claim AND Eric consents it starts the running of the clock for adverse possession all over again nothing
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 4 steps

Blurred answer