Respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words:  How might a person who adopts Buddhist philosophy interact with or consider the demands of modern life (e.g., peoples’ dependence on technology, less face-to-face communication, or desires for more money)?What basic beliefs of Buddhism would support those interactions or perspectives? How do Buddhist history, teachings, or the life of the Buddha inform reactions to experiences of modern life ?

The study of computer science has nothing to do with actual computers, just as the study of medicine has nothing to do with actual stethoscopes. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the aforementioned statement? Using concrete examples, please explain your viewpoint.

Russell, Socrates, and Janet Radcliffe Richards all argue that philosophy is valuable, but they may do so for different reasons and on the basis of different arguments. What arguments do they make about the value of Philosophy? What similarities do you see between their views? What differences are there between their arguments and positions? Which of these three views do you find the most compelling?

The usage of computers and information systems is now prevalent in many common items such as amusement park rides, automobiles, elevators, and ovens, among other things, that you would not usually connect with computers or information systems. There are certain advantages, but are there any dangers as well? If, for example, you were riding a roller coaster that was computer controlled, would you feel more or less at ease? Alternatively, would you feel secure enough traveling in a Tesla with the auto-drive function turned on? What are the advantages and disadvantages of computerizing a growing number of daily objects? Do the potential benefits outweigh the risks? What is the reason for this or why is it not?

The availability of sophisticated computers in the modern era has directly contributed to the current state of affairs. Why has the use of computers become so pervasive in educational environments over the course of the past several decades, and what evidence is there to support the presumption that this has been the case?

What implications does extensive usage of artificial intelligence and robots have for society and morality? Do you think it would be better for robots to replace all human employees in the long run if humans were eliminated from the workforce entirely? If this is the case, then what proof do you have to back up the assertion that you made?

To what extent does today's sophisticated technology make morals irrelevant?

Do you believe that the rise of the knowledge worker is being caused by the rise of automation?

What kind of an influence have the achievements of science and technology had on the development of human history?

How does rhetoric integrate into computer science?