Procedure1.00,2.00,3.00,4.00,5.00 ml of the standard Fe2+ solution was pipetted into separate100mL volumetric flasks. The flasks were then filled with 5mL of toxic water, 5ml of 2Msodium acetate, and 4mL of 3M NH2OH. The flasks were then diluted with DI water to the100mL mark, mixed, and let sit for 5 minutes. After 5 minutes, the absorption spectrum of theFeLn²+ for each of the Fe2+ solutions was measured using a spectrophotometer The absorbancewas recorded at a peak wavelength of 510. |Results and DiscussionVol FeWavelength (nm) AbsConcentration15160.02225210.03135220.04145220.05155130.024о What was the concentration?O Discussion of the results. Why do we care about the concentration ofwater? Is this concentration high or low? What are the implications?

Step 1: To calculate the concentration of Fe²⁺ in each solution, we'll utilize the Beer-Lambert Law,…

Answered: Procedure 1.00,2.00,3.00,4.00,5.00 ml…

Chemistry

10th Edition

ISBN:9781305957404

Author:Steven S. Zumdahl, Susan A. Zumdahl, Donald J. DeCoste

Publisher:Steven S. Zumdahl, Susan A. Zumdahl, Donald J. DeCoste

Chapter1: Chemical Foundations

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1RQ: Define and explain the differences between the following terms. a. law and theory b. theory and...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

The standard addition method is used to analyze a sample of a river water for mercury. Solution A is made by pipetting 5.00 mL of undiluted sample in to a 10 mL volumetric flask and filling to the mark with DI water. Solution B is made by pipetting 5.00 mL of undiluted sample and 3.00 mL of 15.0 ppb of Hg standard into same 10.0 mL volumetric flask and filling to the mark with DI. Solution A and B are analyzed using atomic absorption spectroscopy and give a percent transmittance values of 56 % and 33 % respectively (not blank corrected). A blank has a transmittance of 96%. What is the corrected absorbance of both solution A and B? A. Solution A: 0.123 Solution B: 0.463 B. Solution A: 0.463 Solution B: 0.234 C. Solution A: 0.123 Solution B: 0.234 D. Solution A: 0.234 Solution B: 0.463
The standard addition method is used to analyze a sample of a river water for mercury. Solution A is made by pipetting 5.00 mL of undiluted sample in to a 10 mL volumetric flask and filling to the mark with DI water. Solution B is made by pipetting 5.00 mL of undiluted sample and 3.00 mL of 15.0 ppb of Hg standard into same 10.0 mL volumetric flask and filling to the mark with DI. Solution A and B are analyzed using atomic absorption spectroscopy and give a percent transmittance values of 56 % and 33 % respectively (not blank corrected). A blank has a transmittance of 96%. What is the corrected absorbance of both solution A and B? O A. Solution A: 0.123 Solution B: 0.463 O B. Solution A: 0.463 Solution B: 0.234 O C. Solution A: 0.123 O D. Solution A: 0.234 Solution B: 0.234 Solution B: 0.463
The standard addition method is used to analyze a sample of a river water for mercury. Solution A is made by pipetting 5.00 mL of undiluted sample in to a 10 mL volumetric flask and filling to the mark with DI water. Solution B is made by pipetting 5.00 mL of undiluted sample and 3.00 mL of 15.0 ppb of Hg standard into same 10.0 mL volumetric flask and filling to the mark with DI. Solution A and B are analyzed using atomic absorption spectroscopy and give a percent transmittance values of 56 % and 33 % respectively (not blank corrected). A blank has a transmittance of 96%. What is the corrected absorbance of both solution A and B? OA. Solution A: 0.123 Solution B: 0.463 O B. Solution A: 0.463 Solution B: 0.234 O C. Solution A: 0.123 Solution B: 0.234 O D. Solution A: 0.234 Solution B: 0.463
The standard addition method is used to analyze a sample of a river water for mercury. Solution A is made by pipetting 5.00 mL of undiluted sample in to a 10 mL volumetric flask and filling to the mark with D water. Solution B is made by pipetting 5.00 mL of undiluted sample and 3.00 mL of 15.0 ppb of Hg standard into same 10.0 mL volumetric flask and filling to the mark with DI. Solution A and B are analyzed using atomic absorption spectroscopy and give a percent transmittance values of 56 % and 33 % respectively (not blank corrected). A blank has a transmittance of 96%. Which of the following technique can be used to determine the amount of mercury in the undiluted sample of river water? O A. IR spectroscopy O B. Cold vapor atomic absorption OC. Hydride generation atomic absorption OD. Electrothermal atomic absorption
Six 50.0 ml volumetric flask 1 through 6 are labeled. 10.00 ml of 2.00 x 10-1 M Fe(NO3)3 solution was then pipet into each volumetric flask. A 1.00,2.00,3.00,4.00 and 5.00ml of 2.00 x 10-3M NaSCN solution was then pipetted to flask 2 through 6 respectively. A sufficient amount of 0.10 M nitric acid was then added to each flask to make each a total volume of 50.00ml. Hint M1V1=M2V2 a)what would be the concentration of Fe(NO3)3 in 0.10M HNO3? b)what would be the concentration of NaSCN in 0.10M HNO3?
1. A sample of an infusion was diluted 10 ml to 250 ml and then 10 ml to 200 ml. It was then analysed and was found to contain sodium at 0.789 mg/100 ml. Calculate the concentration of sodium in the original sample in %w/v. The sample was composed of a mixture of sodium lactate and sodium carbonate in equimolar amounts. Calculate the amount of sodium lactate and sodium carbonate in mg/10 ml of the sample (Na = 23, lactate = 89, carbonate = 60) 2. 0.641 g of a semi-synthetic alkaloid was dissolved in 25 ml of 1% w/v acetic acid and was analysed directly by HPLC. The solution was found to contain 1.42 mg/100 ml of an impurity. What is the level of impurity in % w/w and ppm? 3. Calculate the pH of a buffer system made by dissolving 1.2 g of acetic acid and 0.82 g of sodium acetate in 500 ml of distilled water (pKa of acetic acid = 4.7) 4. Convert the following concentrations into the required expression. Concentration given Expression required 0.5% NaCl molarity 1 mM of KBr…
A controversy broke out as a dead body was found in a bar on Cornelia Street. The media revealed that minutes before the person died, he described his drink as something stronger than other drinks in the bar. You were the analyst tasked to verify the cause of death. Preliminary qualitative tests showed the possible presence of cyanide in the victim's death. Thus, you tried to quantitatively detect cyanide ions in the victim's drink using spectrophotometric analysis. Standard solutions were of different CN- concentrations were made as shown in Table 2. A 25.0mL aliquot of each standard solution was added with Fe(NO3)3 to form the colored complex, [Fe(CN)6]³ (aq). Each standard solution was then diluted to a total volume of 50.0 mL. The absorbances of the diluted standard solutions were recorded using 1.00-cm cells and at Amax = 725 nm and found in Table 2. Table 2. Raw absorbance measurements for each standard solution of CN-. [CN-] prior to dilution, M Abs@725nm 0.002 0.000 0.040 0.160…
Rinse and fill the buret with 0.100 M HCl solution. Transfer accurately 25.0 mL of saturated calcium hydroxide solution (2g of calcium hydroxide per 100 ml of water) into two separate E-flasks. Add 2 drops of phenolphthalein to each flask and titrate each solution until the pink color disappears. Voume of HCl used: Trial 1= 6.80ml; Trial 2 = 6.30mL Determination of solubility and Ksp of calcium hydroxide 2. Compute for the moles of H+ used and the moles of OH- present. moles of H+ used = (concentration of HCl) × (volume of HCl used)moles of OH- = moles of H+ used 3. Construct an ICE table for the reaction.4. Calculate the molar solubility (in mol/L) of OH- and Ca2+.5. Determine the solubility of Ca(OH)2 in g/L. (MM of Ca(OH)2 = 74.096 g/mol)6. Calculate the Ksp of Ca(OH)2.7. Compute for the percent error of the experimental value for Ksp of Ca(OH)2 with the literature value.(Ksp of Ca(OH)2 = 8.0 × 10-6 at 25°C)
A 15.00 g sample containing mixed alkali and other inert components was dissolved and diluted to 300 mL with water. A 20 ml, aliquot was titrated with 5.02 mL of 0.5352 M HCI to reach PHP endpoint. Another 20 mL aliquot was titrated to the BCG endpoint, using up 18.87 mL of titrant in the process. Identify the alkali components and their percent weight.
A 25.00mL wastewater sample was analyzed for its Mg2+ content using a standard gravimetric method. the sample was diluted to 3.00L and an 11.00mL aliquot was treated to precipitate magnesium as MgNH4PO4.6H2O using (NH4)2HPO4 as the precipitating agent. the precipitate was then filtered, washed, dried, and ignited resulting in a 0.1325mg Mg2P2O7 residue. How much Mg (in ppm) is present in the original sample
A sample of an infusion was diluted 10 ml to 250 ml and then 10 ml to 200 ml. It was thenanalysed and was found to contain sodium at 0.789 mg/100 ml. Calculate the concentrationof sodium in the original sample in %w/v. The sample was composed of a mixture of sodiumlactate and sodium carbonate in equimolar amounts. Calculate the amount of sodiumlactate and sodium carbonate in mg/10 ml of the sample (Na = 23, lactate = 89, carbonate =60)
Six 50.0 ml volumetric flask 1-6 are labeled. 10.00 ml of 2.00 x 101 M Fe(NO3)3 solution was then pipet into each volumetric flask. A 1.00,2.00,3.00,4.00 and 5.00ml of 2.00 x 10-3M NaSCN solution was then pipetted to flask 2 through 6 respectively. A sufficient 0.10 M nitric acid was then added to each flask to make them total volume of 50.00ml. 1.a)Calculate the final Fe(NO3)3 concentrations for each. 1.b)Also how would you find the initial concentration of SCN- for each flask? Please show calculations to solutions.Thanks

SEE MORE QUESTIONS

Recommended textbooks for you

Chemistry

ISBN:

9781305957404

Author:

Steven S. Zumdahl, Susan A. Zumdahl, Donald J. DeCoste

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Chemistry

ISBN:

9781259911156

Author:

Raymond Chang Dr., Jason Overby Professor

Publisher:

McGraw-Hill Education

Principles of Instrumental Analysis

Chemistry

ISBN:

9781305577213

Author:

Douglas A. Skoog, F. James Holler, Stanley R. Crouch

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Chemistry

ISBN:

9781305957404

Author:

Steven S. Zumdahl, Susan A. Zumdahl, Donald J. DeCoste

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Chemistry

ISBN:

9781259911156

Author:

Raymond Chang Dr., Jason Overby Professor

Publisher:

McGraw-Hill Education

Principles of Instrumental Analysis

Chemistry

ISBN:

9781305577213

Author:

Douglas A. Skoog, F. James Holler, Stanley R. Crouch

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Organic Chemistry

Chemistry

ISBN:

9780078021558

Author:

Janice Gorzynski Smith Dr.

Publisher:

McGraw-Hill Education

Chemistry: Principles and Reactions

Chemistry

ISBN:

9781305079373

Author:

William L. Masterton, Cecile N. Hurley

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Elementary Principles of Chemical Processes, Bind…

Chemistry

ISBN:

9781118431221

Author:

Richard M. Felder, Ronald W. Rousseau, Lisa G. Bullard

Publisher:

WILEY

SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS