Plantwide Overhead Rate versus Departmental Rates, Effects on Pricing Decisions Cherise Ortega, marketing manager for Romer Company, was puzzled by the outcome of two recent bids. The company's policy was to bid 150 percent of the full manufacturing cost. One job (labeled Job 97-28) had been turned down by a prospective customer, who had indicated that the proposed price was $3 per unit higher than the winning bid. A second job (Job 97-35) had been accepted by a customer, who was amazed that Romer could offer such favorable terms. This customer revealed that Romer's price was $43 per unit lower than the next lowest bid. Cherise has been informed that the company was more than competitive in terms of cost control. Accordingly, she began to suspect that the problem was related to cost assignment procedures. Upon investigating, Cherise was told that the company uses a plantwide overhead rate based on direct labor hours. The rate is computed at the beginning of the year using budgeted data. Selected budgeted data are given below. Total Department A $500,000 Overhead Department B $2,000,000 50,000 $2,500,000 Direct labor hours 200,000 250,000 120,000 Machine hours 20,000 100,000 Cherise also discovered that the overhead costs in Department B were higher than those in Department A because B has more equipment, higher maintenance, higher power consumption, higher depreciation, and higher setup costs. In addition to the general procedures for assigning overhead costs, Cherise was supplied with the following specific manufacturing data on Jobs 97-28 and 97-35: Job 97-28 Department B Direct labor hours Machine hours Prime costs Units produced Direct labor hours Machine hours Job 97-28 Job 97-35 Department A Job 97-28 Job 97-35 5,000 200 $100,000 14,400 Department A 51.00 500 200 $10,000 1,500 X X 1,000 400 $20,000 14,400 Job 97-35 Department B 600 3,000 $30,000 1,500 Prime costs Units produced Required: 1. Using a plantwide overhead rate based on direct labor hours, develop the bid prices for Jobs 97-28 and 97-35 (express the bid prices on a per-unit basis). If required, round your answers to the nearest cent. Unit bid price 18.75 ✓ Total 6,000 600 918 X $120,000 14,400 2. Using departmental overhead rates (use direct labor hours for Department A and machine hours for Department B), develop per-unit bid prices for Jobs 97-28 and 97-35. If required, round intermediate computations and final answers to the nearest cent. Unit bid price Total 1,100 3,200 $40,000 1,500 3. Compute the difference in gross profit that would have been earned had the company used departmental rates in its bids instead of the plantwide rate. Round your intermediate computations to two decimal places and final answer to the nearest dollar. Gross profit would have increased by ✔

Managerial Accounting
15th Edition
ISBN:9781337912020
Author:Carl Warren, Ph.d. Cma William B. Tayler
Publisher:Carl Warren, Ph.d. Cma William B. Tayler
Chapter10: Evaluating Decentralized Operations
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 2TIF
icon
Related questions
Question
Plantwide Overhead Rate versus Departmental Rates, Effects on Pricing Decisions
Cherise Ortega, marketing manager for Romer Company, was puzzled by the outcome of two recent bids. The company's policy was to bid 150 percent of the full manufacturing cost. One job (labeled Job 97-28) had been
turned down by a prospective customer, who had indicated that the proposed price was $3 per unit higher than the winning bid. A second job (Job 97-35) had been accepted by a customer, who was amazed that Romer
could offer such favorable terms. This customer revealed that Romer's price was $43 per unit lower than the next lowest bid.
Cherise has been informed that the company was more than competitive in terms of cost control. Accordingly, she began to suspect that the problem was related to cost assignment procedures. Upon investigating, Cherise
was told that the company uses a plantwide overhead rate based on direct labor hours. The rate is computed at the beginning of the year using budgeted data. Selected budgeted data are given below.
Department A
$500,000
200,000
Department B
$2,000,000
50,000
20,000
100,000
Overhead
Direct labor hours
Machine hours
Direct labor hours
Machine hours
Prime costs
Units produced
Cherise also discovered that the overhead costs in Department B were higher than those in Department A because B has more equipment, higher maintenance, higher power consumption, higher depreciation, and higher
setup costs. In addition to the general procedures for assigning overhead costs, Cherise was supplied with the following specific manufacturing data on Jobs 97-28 and 97-35:
Job 97-28
Job 97-28
Job 97-35
Department A
Job 97-28
5,000
Job 97-35
200
$100,000
14,400
Department A
500
200
$10,000
1,500
X
Department B
X
1,000
400
$20,000
14,400
Job 97-35
Department B
Direct labor hours
Machine hours
Prime costs
Units produced
Required:
1. Using a plantwide overhead rate based on direct labor hours, develop the bid prices for Jobs 97-28 and 97-35 (express the bid prices on a per-unit basis). If required, round your answers to the nearest cent.
Unit bid price
18.75 ✔
51.00 ✓
600
Total
$2,500,000
250,000
120,000
3,000
$30,000
1.500
Total
6,000
600
2. Using departmental overhead rates (use direct labor hours for Department A and machine hours for Department B), develop per-unit bid prices for Jobs 97-28 and 97-35. If required, round intermediate computations
and final answers to the nearest cent.
Unit bid price
918 X
$120,000
14,400
Total
1,100
3,200
$40,000
1,500
3. Compute the difference in gross profit that would have been earned had the company used departmental rates in its bids instead of the plantwide rate. Round your intermediate computations to two decimal places and
final answer to the nearest dollar.
Gross profit would have increased by $
Transcribed Image Text:Plantwide Overhead Rate versus Departmental Rates, Effects on Pricing Decisions Cherise Ortega, marketing manager for Romer Company, was puzzled by the outcome of two recent bids. The company's policy was to bid 150 percent of the full manufacturing cost. One job (labeled Job 97-28) had been turned down by a prospective customer, who had indicated that the proposed price was $3 per unit higher than the winning bid. A second job (Job 97-35) had been accepted by a customer, who was amazed that Romer could offer such favorable terms. This customer revealed that Romer's price was $43 per unit lower than the next lowest bid. Cherise has been informed that the company was more than competitive in terms of cost control. Accordingly, she began to suspect that the problem was related to cost assignment procedures. Upon investigating, Cherise was told that the company uses a plantwide overhead rate based on direct labor hours. The rate is computed at the beginning of the year using budgeted data. Selected budgeted data are given below. Department A $500,000 200,000 Department B $2,000,000 50,000 20,000 100,000 Overhead Direct labor hours Machine hours Direct labor hours Machine hours Prime costs Units produced Cherise also discovered that the overhead costs in Department B were higher than those in Department A because B has more equipment, higher maintenance, higher power consumption, higher depreciation, and higher setup costs. In addition to the general procedures for assigning overhead costs, Cherise was supplied with the following specific manufacturing data on Jobs 97-28 and 97-35: Job 97-28 Job 97-28 Job 97-35 Department A Job 97-28 5,000 Job 97-35 200 $100,000 14,400 Department A 500 200 $10,000 1,500 X Department B X 1,000 400 $20,000 14,400 Job 97-35 Department B Direct labor hours Machine hours Prime costs Units produced Required: 1. Using a plantwide overhead rate based on direct labor hours, develop the bid prices for Jobs 97-28 and 97-35 (express the bid prices on a per-unit basis). If required, round your answers to the nearest cent. Unit bid price 18.75 ✔ 51.00 ✓ 600 Total $2,500,000 250,000 120,000 3,000 $30,000 1.500 Total 6,000 600 2. Using departmental overhead rates (use direct labor hours for Department A and machine hours for Department B), develop per-unit bid prices for Jobs 97-28 and 97-35. If required, round intermediate computations and final answers to the nearest cent. Unit bid price 918 X $120,000 14,400 Total 1,100 3,200 $40,000 1,500 3. Compute the difference in gross profit that would have been earned had the company used departmental rates in its bids instead of the plantwide rate. Round your intermediate computations to two decimal places and final answer to the nearest dollar. Gross profit would have increased by $
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 5 steps with 2 images

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Profit markup and markdown
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, accounting and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Managerial Accounting
Managerial Accounting
Accounting
ISBN:
9781337912020
Author:
Carl Warren, Ph.d. Cma William B. Tayler
Publisher:
South-Western College Pub
Cornerstones of Cost Management (Cornerstones Ser…
Cornerstones of Cost Management (Cornerstones Ser…
Accounting
ISBN:
9781305970663
Author:
Don R. Hansen, Maryanne M. Mowen
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Principles of Cost Accounting
Principles of Cost Accounting
Accounting
ISBN:
9781305087408
Author:
Edward J. Vanderbeck, Maria R. Mitchell
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Principles of Accounting Volume 2
Principles of Accounting Volume 2
Accounting
ISBN:
9781947172609
Author:
OpenStax
Publisher:
OpenStax College
Managerial Accounting: The Cornerstone of Busines…
Managerial Accounting: The Cornerstone of Busines…
Accounting
ISBN:
9781337115773
Author:
Maryanne M. Mowen, Don R. Hansen, Dan L. Heitger
Publisher:
Cengage Learning