Patrick Clean Don't clean Clean $5 $4 $6 Patrick (Click to select) Cameron (Click to select) Is there a Nash equilibrium in this game? Don't clean $6 $3 Yes, and both Patrick and Cameron choose to clean. O No, there is no Nash equilibrium. Yes, and neither Patrick nor Cameron chooses to clean. O Yes, and Patrick chooses to clean while Cameron chooses not to clean. Yes, and Cameron chooses to clean while Patrick chooses not to clean.

Patrick Clean Don't clean Clean $5 $4 $6 Patrick (Click to select) Cameron (Click to select) Is there a Nash equilibrium in this game? Don't clean $6 $3 Yes, and both Patrick and Cameron choose to clean. O No, there is no Nash equilibrium. Yes, and neither Patrick nor Cameron chooses to clean. O Yes, and Patrick chooses to clean while Cameron chooses not to clean. Yes, and Cameron chooses to clean while Patrick chooses not to clean.

Microeconomic Theory

12th Edition

ISBN:9781337517942

Author:NICHOLSON

Publisher:NICHOLSON

Chapter8: Game Theory

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 8.3P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Tucker and Eddie are playing the following game. Tucker can choose A or B and Eddie can choose C or D. The first payoff is for Tucker, the second for Eddie. Eddie Tucker C D A 3, 2 4, 3 B 4, 5 3, 4 Identify the Nash equilibrium(s) in this game. What rational game theoretic advice would you offer Tucker and Eddie on how to play this game? If Tucker and Eddie follow your advice, what payoff should each expect? Show your work.
ROWENA 2 Answer 1: 2 Answer 2: 2 Answer 3: 1 Earth Water Wind Answer 4: Fire of the Nash equilibrium, (Rowena's 1 Colin's 3 3 North 1.3 This simultaneous game has two Nash equilibria. The Nash equilibrium, (Rowena's 2 , Colin's 1,2 3,2 2,0 COLIN South 3,1 1,2 2,1 3,0 East 0,2 2,3 1,1 West 1.1 1,1 0,3 2,2 ) has a greater joint payoff than that
Game Theory Question A non-profit firm is on a local community online donation platform for a community event it wants to hold (only community members can donate via the website). The event will be held only if the non-profit firm collects $20,000 total from members of the community. Each member values the event at $500. Suppose that there are 100 community members. Community members can only donate by purchasing a lottery ticket from the firm. Each ticket costs $200 and only one ticket can be purchased per member. The proceeds will be collected by the firm. The lottery winner gets a premier meal at a local restaurant that's worth $100. Remember, the firm keeps all the donated money. If the amount of donations is less than $20,000, then the firm returns the donated money to the community members (since there'll be no event held but the lottery winner still gets to eat that fancy meal). If the donations sum up to $20,000, the community event will take place. What are the Nash…
Consider the following simultaneous move game: Player 1 U M D Player 2 L 2,10 2,5 8,7 C 5,2 11,8 8,4 R 5,4 2,9 8,3 In the Nash equilibrium of this game, player 1 receives a payoff of ✓ and player 2 receives a payoff of
Team 2 plays A Team 2 plays B Team 1 plays A 2, 1 0,0 Team 1 plays B 0,0 1, 2 Consider the game above. Which of the following is a Nash Equilibrium of the game? O Team 1 plays A two thirds of the time and plays the rest of the time, while team 2 plays A two thirds of the time and plays B the rest of the time. Team 1 plays A one quarter of the time and plays B the rest of the time, while team 2 plays A one quarter of the time and plays B the rest of the time. Team 1 plays A one quarter of the time and plays B the rest of the time, while team 2 plays A three quarters of the time and plays B the rest of the time. O None of the other answers are correct. Team 1 plays A two thirds of the time and plays B the rest of the time, while team 2 plays A one third of the time and plays B the rest of the time.
Sam and Sarah are thinking about getting married. However if either of them cheats on the other, they would get a payoff of 10, while the other person gets zero. If neither cheat, they stay with each other and get a payoff of 7 each and if both cheat, the relationship falls apart and each get a payoff of 1. What is the Nash equilibrium of this game? a. Cheat, Cheat b. Not cheat, Not cheat Sam cheats, Sarah doesn't Sarah cheats, Sam doesn't
Jagtar and Ravi both grow mangoes, which they sell in the same local market. They are deciding whether to pick 5 baskets worth of mangoes or 10 baskets, and have the following profit matrix: Jagtar 5 1 17 5 1 22 16 14 Ravi 1 24 14 a. What is the Nash equilibrium if both individuals make their decisions simultaneously? b. Does your analysis change if the local market charges a lump-sum fee of 12 to set up a stall and sell the mangoes in the space it provides? c. What would happen if the local market were instead to charge a lump-sum fee of 18?
Q3 Consider the following three-player normal form game (Player 3 is the page player): Player 3 A в Player 2 Player 2 A в A B 1,2, 3 в 2,3,1 Player 1 A Player 1 A 2, 1, 3 3, 2, 1 3, 2, 1 1,2, 3 в 1,3, 2 3, 1,2 For each player, strategies are A and B. a) Find the pure strategy Nash equilibrium of the above game. Assume now that the above game is played sequentially, with Player 3 moving first, Player 1 moving second, and Player 2 moving third. b) Write down the game tree. c) For each player, list all the available pure strategies. d) Find the subgame perfect equilibrium outcome and compare it with the equilibrium outcome you found in subquestion a). Comment.
Consider the payoff matrix for a game depicted below. Player 1 selects the row and Player 2 selects the column. Up Down Left 1, -1 -1, 1 Right -1, 1 1, -1 What is (are) the Nash equilibrium (equilibria)? Question 18Answer a. Player 1 plays right; Player 2 plays down b. Player 1 plays left; Player 2 plays down c. Player 1 plays down; Player 2 plays left d. Player 1 plays right; Player 2 plays up e. Player 1 plays up; Player 2 plays left f. There is no Nash equilibrium g. Player 1 plays down; Player 2 plays right h. Player 1 plays up; Player 2 plays right i. Player 1 plays left; Player 2 plays up
Suppose you are interested in applying equilibrium theory to the following game, where 01 Nash equilibrium in which player 2 plays a sub-optimal action. {E, F}. Show that there is Bayesian Player 2 A • 1,1 GF Player 1 R • -1,0 NF 0,0 Nature A • 1,0 GE 1-p R -1, –1 NE 0,0
(The Beckhams' dilemma) Victoria and David are husband and wife. They both prefer ciean to dirty house but neither likes to clean the house. Their payoffs are given in the table below. Victoria Clean Don't clean 0,8 Clean 5,5 David Don't clean 8,0 1,1 a) Let say they play the clean house game only once, what is the Nash equilibrium? b) Let say Victoria and David has to decide whether to clean or not every day for indefinite number of days. How grim-trigger strategy will be our subgame perfect Nash equilibrium? In other words, what is the patience rate that ensure Victoria and David maintain the cleanliness of the house?
Consider the following simultaneous move game where player 1 has two types. Player 2 does not know if he is playing with type a player 1 or type b player 1. Player 2 C D Player 1 A 12,9 3,6 B 6,0 6,9 C D A 0,9 3,6 B 6,0 6,9 Type a Player 1 Prob = 2/3 Type b Player 1 Prob = 1/3 Find the all the possible Bayesian Nash Equilibriums (BNE) of this game.