Objective: Care plans will be based on the case studies posted in D2L (go to the Chronic illness Family Careplan folder). Student will synthesize concepts of Rural Nursing Theory, chronic illness, and principles of patient and family centered care with nursing process to plan holistic care for a patient/family living with chronic illness. The plan should be specific enough so that another nurse could adhere to the care plan you wrote-continuity of care is important! Note an optional template is included in the it Guidance and Template folder

Comprehensive Medical Assisting: Administrative and Clinical Competencies (MindTap Course List)
6th Edition
ISBN:9781305964792
Author:Wilburta Q. Lindh, Carol D. Tamparo, Barbara M. Dahl, Julie Morris, Cindy Correa
Publisher:Wilburta Q. Lindh, Carol D. Tamparo, Barbara M. Dahl, Julie Morris, Cindy Correa
Chapter6: Legal Considerations
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 6.1CS
icon
Related questions
Question
No need guideline answer just solve full accurate with references ok full accurate need ok
6. Evaluation
considered-
7. Consideration of
rural residence
8. Barriers
9. Empowerment
Strategies
10. Summary
statement(s)
9. Resources
10. Writing quality
Interventions are individualized
and 'fit' with the unique situation.
11. APA style
Interventions are specific enough
so another nurse could adhere to
the plan to facilitate continuity.
Addresses how the nurse will
evaluate the plan of care and
modify as needed. (
A minimum of two concepts of
Rural Health Nursing Theory (find
list of these concepts on p. 6 in text
edited by Winters) that fit with
scenario are explored as they fit
with unique patient/family
scenario.
Briefly discuss at least barriers this
individual family may encounter
while trying to attain their desired
quality of life. Supported with
evidence.
Briefly discuss at least three
strategies/interventions a nurse
could implement to help this
individual family reach the quality
of life they desire. Supported with
evidence.
Gives the paper/plan a sense of
completeness.
Leaves the reader with a final
impression.
synthesized and integrated into
plan appropriately.
Plan is clear and focused. Fewer
than six punctuation, spelling,
spacing, capitalization and writing
mechanics errors.
/or root causes not
included.
Uses APA style correctly for
citations and references. Uses
headings if writing care plan in
narrative format.
Interventions do not.
'fit' with situation.
Interventions not
specific enough for
another nurse to
follow.
Evaluation not
appropriate for unique
situation.
Rural Health Nursing
concepts are
addressed, but not
explored.
Barriers listed, but not
discussed or not
supported with
evidence
Strategies listed, but
not discussed or not
supported with
evidence.
principles or
root cause
analysis
Interventions
vague
Concepts do not clearly situation.
fit with unique
situation.
Evaluation not
considered
Plan lacking in clarity.
Fewer than 12 writing
mechanics errors.
Rural Health
Nursing Theory
concepts
included do not
fit with unique
Organization and effectiveness
(these criteria are not a specific part of the care plan, but look at the plan as a whole)
References drawn from a minimum
of three professional nursing
journal articles (Note criteria
insyllabus) Journal resources are
Fewer than three
professional nursing
journal resources
synthesized and
integrated
Barriers listed
but not
discussed and
not supported
with evidence.
Strategies listed
but not
discussed and
not supported
with evidence.
Sense of completeness No summary
lacking.
statement(s)
Fewer than two
professional
nursing journal
resources
synthesized and
integrated
Twelve or more
writing
mechanics.
errors.
Fewer than six errors in Six or more APA
APA style. Uses
errors errors.
headings if writing as
narrative. (
Transcribed Image Text:6. Evaluation considered- 7. Consideration of rural residence 8. Barriers 9. Empowerment Strategies 10. Summary statement(s) 9. Resources 10. Writing quality Interventions are individualized and 'fit' with the unique situation. 11. APA style Interventions are specific enough so another nurse could adhere to the plan to facilitate continuity. Addresses how the nurse will evaluate the plan of care and modify as needed. ( A minimum of two concepts of Rural Health Nursing Theory (find list of these concepts on p. 6 in text edited by Winters) that fit with scenario are explored as they fit with unique patient/family scenario. Briefly discuss at least barriers this individual family may encounter while trying to attain their desired quality of life. Supported with evidence. Briefly discuss at least three strategies/interventions a nurse could implement to help this individual family reach the quality of life they desire. Supported with evidence. Gives the paper/plan a sense of completeness. Leaves the reader with a final impression. synthesized and integrated into plan appropriately. Plan is clear and focused. Fewer than six punctuation, spelling, spacing, capitalization and writing mechanics errors. /or root causes not included. Uses APA style correctly for citations and references. Uses headings if writing care plan in narrative format. Interventions do not. 'fit' with situation. Interventions not specific enough for another nurse to follow. Evaluation not appropriate for unique situation. Rural Health Nursing concepts are addressed, but not explored. Barriers listed, but not discussed or not supported with evidence Strategies listed, but not discussed or not supported with evidence. principles or root cause analysis Interventions vague Concepts do not clearly situation. fit with unique situation. Evaluation not considered Plan lacking in clarity. Fewer than 12 writing mechanics errors. Rural Health Nursing Theory concepts included do not fit with unique Organization and effectiveness (these criteria are not a specific part of the care plan, but look at the plan as a whole) References drawn from a minimum of three professional nursing journal articles (Note criteria insyllabus) Journal resources are Fewer than three professional nursing journal resources synthesized and integrated Barriers listed but not discussed and not supported with evidence. Strategies listed but not discussed and not supported with evidence. Sense of completeness No summary lacking. statement(s) Fewer than two professional nursing journal resources synthesized and integrated Twelve or more writing mechanics. errors. Fewer than six errors in Six or more APA APA style. Uses errors errors. headings if writing as narrative. (
Appendix E-Chronic Illness Family Care Plan
Objective: Care plans will be based on the case studies posted in D2L (go to the Chronic illness Family
Careplan folder). Student will synthesize concepts of Rural Nursing Theory, chronic illness, and principles
of patient and family centered care with nursing process to plan holistic care for a patient/family living
with chronic illness. The plan should be specific enough so that another nurse could adhere to the care
plan you wrote-continuity of care is important!
Note an optional template is included in the
it Guidance and Template folder.
Guidance and Template folder for more detail, guidance, and an
Competent
Not
satisfactory
Relevant data
not included.
Please refer to the
example.
Criterion
1. Overview of the
situation.
2. Relevant.
assessment data
gathered/included.
3. Priority nursing
concerns identified,
supported by data,
and justified
4. Goals/desired
outcome
Goal formulation
5. Evidence based
nursing interventions
proposed.
Excellent
All relevant data from case study
included.
Organized and clear.
Note: the data you collect in this
section will be fictitious. Include
relevant, significant (fictious) data
collected in this section.
A minimum of two evidence-based
assessment tools, appropriate to
the situation, are used to gather
data (findings will be fictious)
Focused and relevant physical
assessment data (will be fictious)
obtained and included.
Focused and relevant history (will)
be fictious) obtained and included.
Assessment data is organized in a
logical manner, is focused
A minimum of three priority
concerns are identified and clearly
supported by the data gathered.
Priority concerns flow from
assessment data
included/collected.
One concern is a physical; one is
psychosocial; the third can be
either physical or psychosocial.
(these do not need to be written in
NANDA format)
Why did you choose these as
priority? Priority of chosen
concerns is justified and supported
with evidence.
Explain the reasoning for your
prioritization. Reasoning is sound
and does not include logical.
fallacies or assumptions.
Desired outcomes/goals clearly
flow from assessment data.
SMART person and family centered
goals/outcomes for the
patient/family are formulated.
How did you would go about
formulating your goals? (hint:
consider principles of person and
family centered care and root
causes of the nursing concern).
One goal/outcome developed to
meet each priority concern.
Most relevant data
from case study
Briefly explain how you would
develop interventions (Hint:
consider principles of person and
family centered care and root
causes of the nursing concern).
considered. Clarity and
organization are
lacking
Appropriate
Summary of
assessment tools used. findings from
evidence based
assessment
tools not
included
Relevant physical
assessment data not
focused on the
situation.
Clarity and
organization are
lacking.
Concerns included, but
do not flow from data.
Priority concerns
Priority
minimally supported by concerns
gathered data.
Assumptions that could
impact care possible.
SMART criteria for
goals not fully met
findings of
physical
assessment/
health history
not included
assessment
findings not
organized or
clear
outcomes goals do not
address root causes
Priorities not
adequately justified or Priorities not
supported with
evidence
justified or
supported with
evidence
not supported
by data
gathered
or sources do not meet
criteria on p. 9 of
syllabus
Assumptions
that impact care
Explanation of
intervention
development to
include patient/family
centered care care and
have likely been
made
Evidence that goals are Not evident that
person and family
centered is lacking
Goals do not
meet SMART
criteria
Outcomes/goals do not Goals to not
clearly flow from
nursing concerns
flow from
nursing
or
concerns or
address root
causas
Fewer than two
interventions clearly
A minimum of two interventions
flow from each desired
goals/outcomes and are supported flow from each desired interventions
with professional evidence (note
proposed to
criteria for evidence in the syllabus)
outcome or are not
supported by scholarly meet goal.
evidence (no citations)
individual
/family
participated in
goal
development
No evidence
based
Interventions
development
does not
address
patient/family
centered care
Transcribed Image Text:Appendix E-Chronic Illness Family Care Plan Objective: Care plans will be based on the case studies posted in D2L (go to the Chronic illness Family Careplan folder). Student will synthesize concepts of Rural Nursing Theory, chronic illness, and principles of patient and family centered care with nursing process to plan holistic care for a patient/family living with chronic illness. The plan should be specific enough so that another nurse could adhere to the care plan you wrote-continuity of care is important! Note an optional template is included in the it Guidance and Template folder. Guidance and Template folder for more detail, guidance, and an Competent Not satisfactory Relevant data not included. Please refer to the example. Criterion 1. Overview of the situation. 2. Relevant. assessment data gathered/included. 3. Priority nursing concerns identified, supported by data, and justified 4. Goals/desired outcome Goal formulation 5. Evidence based nursing interventions proposed. Excellent All relevant data from case study included. Organized and clear. Note: the data you collect in this section will be fictitious. Include relevant, significant (fictious) data collected in this section. A minimum of two evidence-based assessment tools, appropriate to the situation, are used to gather data (findings will be fictious) Focused and relevant physical assessment data (will be fictious) obtained and included. Focused and relevant history (will) be fictious) obtained and included. Assessment data is organized in a logical manner, is focused A minimum of three priority concerns are identified and clearly supported by the data gathered. Priority concerns flow from assessment data included/collected. One concern is a physical; one is psychosocial; the third can be either physical or psychosocial. (these do not need to be written in NANDA format) Why did you choose these as priority? Priority of chosen concerns is justified and supported with evidence. Explain the reasoning for your prioritization. Reasoning is sound and does not include logical. fallacies or assumptions. Desired outcomes/goals clearly flow from assessment data. SMART person and family centered goals/outcomes for the patient/family are formulated. How did you would go about formulating your goals? (hint: consider principles of person and family centered care and root causes of the nursing concern). One goal/outcome developed to meet each priority concern. Most relevant data from case study Briefly explain how you would develop interventions (Hint: consider principles of person and family centered care and root causes of the nursing concern). considered. Clarity and organization are lacking Appropriate Summary of assessment tools used. findings from evidence based assessment tools not included Relevant physical assessment data not focused on the situation. Clarity and organization are lacking. Concerns included, but do not flow from data. Priority concerns Priority minimally supported by concerns gathered data. Assumptions that could impact care possible. SMART criteria for goals not fully met findings of physical assessment/ health history not included assessment findings not organized or clear outcomes goals do not address root causes Priorities not adequately justified or Priorities not supported with evidence justified or supported with evidence not supported by data gathered or sources do not meet criteria on p. 9 of syllabus Assumptions that impact care Explanation of intervention development to include patient/family centered care care and have likely been made Evidence that goals are Not evident that person and family centered is lacking Goals do not meet SMART criteria Outcomes/goals do not Goals to not clearly flow from nursing concerns flow from nursing or concerns or address root causas Fewer than two interventions clearly A minimum of two interventions flow from each desired goals/outcomes and are supported flow from each desired interventions with professional evidence (note proposed to criteria for evidence in the syllabus) outcome or are not supported by scholarly meet goal. evidence (no citations) individual /family participated in goal development No evidence based Interventions development does not address patient/family centered care
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 4 steps

Blurred answer
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Comprehensive Medical Assisting: Administrative a…
Comprehensive Medical Assisting: Administrative a…
Nursing
ISBN:
9781305964792
Author:
Wilburta Q. Lindh, Carol D. Tamparo, Barbara M. Dahl, Julie Morris, Cindy Correa
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
3-2-1 Code It
3-2-1 Code It
Biology
ISBN:
9781337660549
Author:
GREEN
Publisher:
Cengage
Understanding Health Insurance: A Guide to Billin…
Understanding Health Insurance: A Guide to Billin…
Health & Nutrition
ISBN:
9781337679480
Author:
GREEN
Publisher:
Cengage