If your data set contains purely nominal data feature elements, Naive Bayesian classification is a good method to use. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Justify your answer.
Justify the answer that is agree or disagree.
If a dataset contains purely nominal data feature elements, Naive Bayes classification can be a good method to use. I agree with this statement for the following reasons:
First, Naive Bayes is a simple and efficient algorithm that works well with large datasets. It is a probabilistic classifier that uses Bayes' theorem to compute the probability of each class given the input features.
Second, Naive Bayes assumes that the features are independent of each other, which may not always be the case in real-world datasets. However, with purely nominal data, it is reasonable to assume independence between the features, which makes Naive Bayes a good choice.
Third, Naive Bayes is particularly well-suited to text classification, where the features are typically binary indicators of the presence or absence of a particular word or phrase. This type of data is often nominal in nature, and Naive Bayes has been shown to perform well in this context.
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps
