crime = β0 + β1unem + β2police_exp + u I am trying to estimate the causal effect of government expenditure on the local police force (police_exp) on crime rates (crime).  But, it can be hard to estimate the causal effect of police expenditure on crime, even after controlling for the local area unemployment rate (unem). The reason is that crime rates and expenditure on the police are simultaneously determined, or in other words that there are many omitted factors that drive the crime rate in a local area and that are also related to expenditure on police. So expenditure on police is endogenous in this model. I am planning to use the local area crime rate from three years ago (crime−3) as a proxy for these omitted local area characteristics. Which of the following assumptions must my proxy variable crime−3 satisfy to ensure that I can consistently estimate the effect of police expenditure on crime? a) E (crime−3 | unem,police_exp) = 0 b) Corr(crime−3,crime) = 0 c) Corr(crime−3,u) = 0 d) Corr(crime−3,u) ≠ 0

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
14th Edition
ISBN:9780190931919
Author:NEWNAN
Publisher:NEWNAN
Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1QTC
icon
Related questions
Question

I have the following model for local area crime rates:

crime = β0 + β1unem + β2police_exp + u

I am trying to estimate the causal effect of government expenditure on the local police force (police_exp) on crime rates (crime). 

But, it can be hard to estimate the causal effect of police expenditure on crime, even after controlling for the local area unemployment rate (unem).

The reason is that crime rates and expenditure on the police are simultaneously determined, or in other words that there are many omitted factors that drive the crime rate in a local area and that are also related to expenditure on police. So expenditure on police is endogenous in this model.

I am planning to use the local area crime rate from three years ago (crime−3) as a proxy for these omitted local area characteristics.

Which of the following assumptions must my proxy variable crime−3 satisfy to ensure that I can consistently estimate the effect of police expenditure on crime?

a) E (crime−3 | unem,police_exp) = 0

b) Corr(crime−3,crime) = 0

c) Corr(crime−3,u) = 0

d) Corr(crime−3,u) ≠ 0

Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Tax Revenue
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
Economics
ISBN:
9780190931919
Author:
NEWNAN
Publisher:
Oxford University Press
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134078779
Author:
Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:
PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134870069
Author:
William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:
PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:
9781305585126
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:
9781337106665
Author:
Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Economics
ISBN:
9781259290619
Author:
Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education