Construct the sequential game tree when Cable-net takes the first mover position by deciding whether to invest in infrastructure capacity expansion. Find the Nash equilibrium path by using the roll-back technique. How much profit does each firm earn? (Hint: the game tree will have three sequential decisions: Cable-net makes the decision first whether to invest in infrastructure capacity expansion, Peoplenet makes the entry decision, and Cable-net decides whether to lower the price.)

Construct the sequential game tree when Cable-net takes the first mover position by deciding whether to invest in infrastructure capacity expansion. Find the Nash equilibrium path by using the roll-back technique. How much profit does each firm earn? (Hint: the game tree will have three sequential decisions: Cable-net makes the decision first whether to invest in infrastructure capacity expansion, Peoplenet makes the entry decision, and Cable-net decides whether to lower the price.)

Exploring Economics

8th Edition

ISBN:9781544336329

Author:Robert L. Sexton

Publisher:Robert L. Sexton

Chapter15: Oligopoly And Strategic Behavior

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 14P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Little Kona is a small coffee company that is considering entering a market dominated by Big Brew. Each company’s profit depends on whether Little Kona enters and whether Big Brew sets a high price or a low price:a. Does either player in this game have a dominant strategy?b. Does your answer to part (a) help you figure out what the other player should do?c. What is the Nash equilibrium? Is there only one?d. Big Brew threatens Little Kona by saying, “If you enter, we’re going to set a low price, so you had better stay out.” Do you think Little Kona should believe the threat? Why or why not?c. If the two firms could collude and agree on how to split the total profits, what outcome would they pick?
Using a payoff matrix/table to determine the equilibrium outcome Suppose there are only two firms that sell smartphones, Flashfone and Pictech. The following payoff matrix/table shows the profit (in millions of dollars) each company will earn, depending on whether it sets a high or low price for its phones. Pictech Pricing High Low Flashfone Pricing High 10, 10 4, 12 Low 12, 4 9, 9 For example, the lower left cell shows that if Flashfone prices low and Pictech prices high, Flashfone will earn a profit of $12 million and Pictech will earn a profit of $4 million. Assume this is a simultaneous game and that Flashfone and Pictech are both profit-maximizing firms. If Flashfone prices high, Pictech will make more profit if it chooses a price, and if Flashfone prices low, Pictech will make more profit if it chooses a price. If Pictech prices high, Flashfone will make more profit if it chooses a price, and if Pictech prices low, Flashfone will make…
Using a payoff matrix to determine the equilibrium outcome Suppose there are only two firms that sell smart phones, Flashfone and Pictech. The following payoff matrix shows the profit (in millions of dollars) each company will earn, depending on whether it sets a high or low price for its phones. Pictech Pricing High Low Flashfone Pricing High 11, 11 2, 18 Low 18, 2 10, 10 For example, the lower, left cell shows that if Flashfone prices low and Pictech prices high, Flashfone will earn a profit of $18 million and Pictech will earn a profit of $2 million. Assume this is a simultaneous game and that Flashfone and Pictech are both profit-maximizing firms. If Flashfone prices high, Pictech will make more profit if it chooses a ______ price, and if Flashfone prices low, Pictech will make more profit if it chooses a _____ price. If Pictech prices high, Flashfone will make more profit if it chooses a _____ price, and if Pictech prices low, Flashfone will make more…
Imagine a small town with three car repair shops competing for a limited number of customers. Explain why the three shops working together to keep their prices high is unlikely to be a Nash equilibrium.
Little Kona is a small coffee company that is considering entering a market dominated by Big Brew. Each company's profit depends on whether Little Kona enters and whether Big Brew sets a high price or a low price: True or False: Only Little Kona has a dominant strategy in this game. True or False Which of the following outcomes represent a Nash equilibrium in this case? Check all that apply. Big Brew maintains a high price and Little Kona enters. a.Big Brew maintains a low price and Little Kona enters. b.Big Brew maintains a high price and Little Kona does not enter. c.Big Brew maintains a low price and Little Kona does not enter. Big Brew threatens Little Kona by saying, “If you enter, we're going to set a low price, so you had better stay out.” True or False: Little Kona should not believe the threat. True or False If the two firms could collude and agree on how to split the total profits, what outcome would they…
Consider the following static game with two firms as the players. Each firm must decide either to upgrade (U) an existing good to a new version; or not upgrade it (N). The decisions are simultaneous. If a firm chooses to upgrade, they have to pay a fixed cost of 7. If they don’t upgrade, there is no fixed cost. The marginal cost is always equal to 3. The demand side of the market is as follows: If neither firm upgrades, each firm sells 2 units at price 4. If both firms upgrade, each firm sells 3 units at price 5. If only one firm upgrades, the one who upgrades sells 5 units at price 5, and the other firm does not sell anything.
where is the nash equilibrium? find out the dominant strategy. it was discovered that two domestic manufacturing companies were fixing prices. if each company is silent, there is no penalty, but production and business are disrupted due to continuous investigation by the Fair Trade Commission. The penalty for revealing the estimated loss due to the investigation and collusion is as follows: Firm 2 Silence Disclosure Silence -200, -200 -590, 0 Firm 1 Disclosure 0, -590 -450, -450 fine( a hundred million won)
The attached diagram depicts two firms controlled by Jacob and Elsa, and two potential actions each firm might take. Payoffs from action combinations appear in the normal-form depiction of the game played by Jacob and Elsa. What is the Nash equilibrium of the game (Jacob's strategy listed first)? a b Jacob's Actions d Dont' Advertise Advertise, Advertise Advertise Don't Advertise J=300 J=400 Don't advertise, Don't advertise Elsa's Actions Don't advertise (Jacob), Advertise (Elsa) с Advertise (Jacob), Don't Advertise (Elsa) E=200 Selected answer will be automatically saved. For keyboard navigation, press up/down arrow keys to select an answer. E=50 Advertise J=100 J=200 E=300 E=100
Define a dominant strategy and Nash equilibrium. Can two firms interacting with each other have no Nash equilibria if both have a dominant strategy?
Google and Microsoft are the two dominant firms in the internet search market. They each must decide on whether to have a large budget for research and development (R&D). Their respective payoffs are in the following matrix: Google Microsoft Large R& D Small R& D Large R& D +$30m 0 What is the Nash equilibrium? +$20m +$30m Small R& D +$70m +$50m 0 +$40m Both google and Microsoft have small R&D budgets. There is not a Nash equilibrium because both firms don't have a dominant strategy. Both google and Microsoft have large R&D budgets. Google has a large, and Microsoft a small, R&D budgets.
Refer to the accompanying payoff matrix. Which of the following is a Nash equilibrium? Company A Strategy 1 Strategy 2 Strategy 1 Company A's Profit: $8 million Company B's Profit: $9 million Company B Company A's Profit: $10 million Company B's Profit: $8 million None of the above, Strategy 2 Company B's Profit: $8 million Company A's Profit: $7 million Company B's Profit: $7 million Company A's Profit: $8 million Company A chooses Strategy 1 and Company B chooses Strategy 1. Company A chooses Strategy 2 and Company B chooses Strategy 2. Company A chooses Strategy 1 and Company B chooses Strategy 2. Company A chooses Strategy 2 and Company B chooses Strategy 1.
Read-a-lot Bookstore and Frontier Books are competitors in the Carlton retail book market. Each has a choice of setting a low price or high price. The payoffs from the price choices are: Assume that the game is played sequentially with Frontier making a decision about its choice of price strategy, and then Read-a-lot, after observing Frontier’s strategy, chooses its price strategy. What is the best choice for Frontier? [To answer this question, you need to take into account your answer for question 1 regarding the best strategy for Read-a-Lot.] a. Low price b. High price c. Frontier is indifferent between High price and Low price d. It is not possible to identify a best choice for Frontier.