Consider the simple linear regression model Y = a +Bx + E fori = 1,2,...,n. The variances of two estimators i.e. V(@) and V(B) aredefined as respectivelyNanersite of ARmofSelect one:and V(8)+2(+%3!V(a) = o?%3Dv(a) = o? ;and V(B) =Syxo v(a) = o (:-mnd v(A) -and V(B) =o v(a) = o? (1 +and V(B):Syx= a4o va) = (; +)md V(f) =and V(ß)Syy%3DSyrfsfofa24&57VERYDT-

we wants to estimate the variance of the regression estimators of a regression line: yi=α +β *xi +∈i…

Answered: Consider the simple linear regression…

Consider the simple linear regression model =a+Bx+E for i = 1,2,...,n. The variances of two estimators i.e. V(@) and V(B) are defined as respectively %3D

Calculus For The Life Sciences

2nd Edition

ISBN:9780321964038

Author:GREENWELL, Raymond N., RITCHEY, Nathan P., Lial, Margaret L.

Publisher:GREENWELL, Raymond N., RITCHEY, Nathan P., Lial, Margaret L.

Chapter1: Functions

Section1.2: The Least Square Line

Problem 8E

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Olympic Pole Vault The graph in Figure 7 indicates that in recent years the winning Olympic men’s pole vault height has fallen below the value predicted by the regression line in Example 2. This might have occurred because when the pole vault was a new event there was much room for improvement in vaulters’ performances, whereas now even the best training can produce only incremental advances. Let’s see whether concentrating on more recent results gives a better predictor of future records. (a) Use the data in Table 2 (page 176) to complete the table of winning pole vault heights shown in the margin. (Note that we are using x=0 to correspond to the year 1972, where this restricted data set begins.) (b) Find the regression line for the data in part ‚(a). (c) Plot the data and the regression line on the same axes. Does the regression line seem to provide a good model for the data? (d) What does the regression line predict as the winning pole vault height for the 2012 Olympics? Compare this predicted value to the actual 2012 winning height of 5.97 m, as described on page 177. Has this new regression line provided a better prediction than the line in Example 2?
Suppose we perform a simple linear regression (SLR) of two variables F1 and F2 against the same out variable (say y). The r-squared value/score of both the SLRS are 0.9678 and 0.95123 respectively for F1 and F2. Then what can you say about the correlation? O a. y is more dependent on F2 than F1 O b. None of these O . The result does not say that y is more dependent on F1 OR F2 O d.y is more dependent on F1 than F2
Suppose we have fit a multiple linear regression with 8 explanatory variables and an intercept with 85 observations. We want to test the joint significance of the first 5 explanatory variables using an F test. Please fill in the blanks for the numerator and denominator degrees of freedom of the F statistic of the test: "The F statistic is F(
A regression was run to determine if there is a relationship between the happiness index (y) and life expectancy in years of a given country (x). The results of the regression were: ŷ=a+bx a=-0.523 b=0.177 (a) Write the equation of the Least Squares Regression line of the form j= 0.177 +| -0.523 (b) Which is a possible value for the correlation coefficient, r? O 1.936 O -0.632 O-1.936 O 0.632 (C) If a country increases its life expectancy, the happiness index will O decrease O increase (d) If the life expectancy is increased by 1 years in a certain country, how much will the happiness index change? Round to two decimal places. (e) Use the regression line to predict the happiness index of a country with a life expectancy of 64 years. Round to two decimal places.
Suppose that Y is normal and we have three explanatory unknowns which are also normal, and we have an independent random sample of 12 members of the population, where for each member, the value of Y as well as the values of the three explanatory unknowns were observed. The data is entered into a computer using linear regression software and the output summary tells us that R-square is 0.85, the linear model coefficient of the first explanatory unknown is 7 with standard error estimate 2.5, the coefficient for the second explanatory unknown is 11 with standard error 2, and the coefficient for the third explanatory unknown is 15 with standard error 4. The regression intercept is reported as 28. The sum of squares in regression (SSR) is reported as 85000 and the sum of squared errors (SSE) is 15000. From this information, what is SSE/SST? (a) .2 (b) .13 (c) NONE OF THE OTHERS (d) .15 (e) .25
Two regression lines of a sample are X+6 Y=6 and 3X+2Y=0. Find the correlation coefficient.
Suppose that Y is normal and we have three explanatory unknowns which are also normal, and we have an independent random sample of 21 members of the population, where for each member, the value of Y as well as the values of the three explanatory unknowns were observed. The data is entered into a computer using linear regression software and the output summary tells us that R-square is 0.9, the linear model coefficient of the first explanatory unknown is 7 with standard error estimate 2.5, the coefficient for the second explanatory unknown is 11 with standard error 2, and the coefficient for the third explanatory unknown is 15 with standard error 4. The regression intercept is reported as 28. The sum of squares in regression (SSR) is reported as 90000 and the sum of squared errors (SSE) is 10000. From this information, what is the number of degrees of freedom for the t-distribution used to compute critical values for hypothesis tests and confidence intervals for the individual model…
Suppose that Y is normal and we have three explanatory unknowns which are also normal, and we have an independent random sample of 21 members of the population, where for each member, the value of Y as well as the values of the three explanatory unknowns were observed. The data is entered into a computer using linear regression software and the output summary tells us that R-square is 0.8, the linear model coefficient of the first explanatory unknown is 7 with standard error estimate 2.5, the coefficient for the second explanatory unknown is 11 with standard error 2, and the coefficient for the third explanatory unknown is 15 with standard error 4. The regression intercept is reported as 28. The sum of squares in regression (SSR) is reported as 80000 and the sum of squared errors is (SSE) 20000. From this information, what is the value of the hypothesis test statistic for evidence that the true value of the coefficient of the second explanatory unknown exceeds 5? (a) 4 (b) 3…
Find the simple regression line y=α+βx for the pairs of points belonging to the independent and dependent variables (xi,yi) , respectively. Also, interpret the result by calculating the Pearson correlation coefficient. Please dont use excel.
Suppose that Y is normal and we have three explanatory unknowns which are also normal, and we have an independent random sample of 16 members of the population, where for each member, the value of Y as well as the values of the three explanatory unknowns were observed. The data is entered into a computer using linear regression software and the output summary tells us that R-square is 45/62, the linear model coefficient of the first explanatory unknown is 7 with standard error estimate 2.5, the coefficient for the second explanatory unknown is 11 with standard error 2, and the coefficient for the third explanatory unknown is 15 with standard error 4. The regression intercept is reported as 28. The sum of squares in regression (SSR) is reported as 90000 and the sum of squared errors (SSE) is 34000. From this information, what is the critical value needed to calculate the margin of error for a 95 percent confidence interval for one of the model coefficients? (a) 2.069 (b) 2.110 (c)…