Consider the following network representation of a transportation problem. 60 60 Des Moines 25 15 Jefferson City 9 8 Kansas City 20 8 10 40 Omaha 26 St. Louis 55 Supplies Demands The supplies, demands, and transportation costs per unit are shown on the network. What is the optimal (cost minimizing) distribution plan? Amount Jefferson City-Des Moines 0 0 Jefferson City-Kansas City 5 45 Jefferson City-St. Louis 55 440 Omaha-Des Moines 25 Omaha-Kansas City 15 Omaha-St. Louis Total 0 0 Cost ×

Define (a) externalities and (b) sunk costs, andthen give examples of each that might be involvedin a proposal by an energy company to build anew coal-fired electric power generating unit. Howwould these factors be worked into the analysis?

Suppose we are interested in reducing the carbon footprint associated with heating/cooling buildings oncampus. The functions below describe marginal costs ofCO2abatement (expressed as a function of pollution)for two buildings on the Hendrix College campus. These are hypothetical but are influenced by buildingcharacteristics like age, size, and types of usage. (This information is used for questions 1-4) MCMills = 100−10xM MCSLTC = 75−2.5xS 1. If the College pursued its abatement target by directing each building manager to cut emissions in halffor their respective building, what is the total cost of abatement? 2. If the abatement were pursued with an on-campus carbon tax of$30, would there be the same level ofabatement? Show your work and/or explain. 3. If the goal of the college is to meet the abatement target from question 1, what is the appropriate taxrate? 4. If the appropriate tax rate is used (answer from Q3), how much money can be saved compared to thecommand & control…

Environmental Economics. The equations below describe the marginal costs of abatement for three separate sources (as a function of pollution). %3D МC2 3D 24 - 2е2 МС3 %3 10 - е3/2 (Constructing a graphical presentation of the different cost functions may help) 1. What is the total cost of abatement if each source is forced to cut its pollution by half? 2. What are the cost-savings of an emissions price that achieves the same reduction as the command and control policy described in question 2?