Consider an income guarantee program with an income guarantee of $5,000 and a benefit reduction rate of 40%. A person can work up to 2,000 hours per year at $10 per hour. a. Draw the person’s budget constraint with the income guarantee. b. Suppose that the income guarantee rises to $7,500 but with a 60% reduction rate. Draw the new budget constraint c. Which of these two income guarantee programs is more likely to discourage work? Explain.

Consider an income guarantee program with an income guarantee of $5,000 and a benefit reduction rate of 40%. A person can work up to 2,000 hours per year at $10 per hour. a. Draw the person’s budget constraint with the income guarantee. b. Suppose that the income guarantee rises to $7,500 but with a 60% reduction rate. Draw the new budget constraint c. Which of these two income guarantee programs is more likely to discourage work? Explain.

Economics Today and Tomorrow, Student Edition

1st Edition

ISBN:9780078747663

Author:McGraw-Hill

Publisher:McGraw-Hill

Chapter7: Demand And Supply

Section7.1: Demand

Problem 5R

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Consider an income guarantee program with an income guarantee of $5,000 and a benefit reduction rate of 40%. A person can work up to 2,000 hours per year at $10 per hour. a. Draw the person’s budget constraint with the income guarantee. b. Suppose that the income guarantee rises to $7,500 but with a 60% reduction rate. Draw the new budget constraint c. Which of these two income guarantee programs is more likely to discourage work? Explain. Note:- Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism. Answer completely. You will get up vote for sure.
Government introduces a new income guarantee program for low-income families. Consider the program with an income guarantee of $5000 and a benefit reduction rate of 25%. A person can work up to 2,000 hours per year at $15 per hour. a. Draw the person's budget constraint without and with the income guarantee. Label as many things as you humanly can. b. Who would be affected by this program and who would not (use yearly income and number of hours worked to describe the affected and unaffected groups)?
Consider your decision about how many hours towork.a. Draw your budget constraint assuming thatyou pay no taxes on your income. On the samediagram, draw another budget constraintassuming that you pay a 15 percent income tax.b. Show how the tax might lead you to work morehours, fewer hours, or the same number of hours.Explain.
Helping America’s seniors. Suppose that the government proposes eliminating any tax on earnings from work which are less than $20,000 for Americans at least 62 years old. Seniors earning more than this threshold would still be subject to the normal income tax rates on higher earnings. a. Sketch a budget constraint in the leisure-income diagram consistent with this proposal. b. If the proposal were adopted, what do you predict would happen to the labor supply of seniors? Explain.
2. Assume that in the state of Kentucky, Bill is guaranteed S400 of welfare benefits if he does not work at all. They are allowed a disregard of $100 and face a tax rate of 50%. He has a nonlabor income equal to zero and if the works he can carn a wage of $10 per hour. His total time is 200 hours a woek. a. How many hours of leisure is Bill consuming at his break even point? b. Graph the budget constraint, labeling the break even point and other breaks in the curve as well as slopes of each line. Draw Bill's indifference curves such that he chooses to work 5 hours a month.
Teresa spends her entire scholarship of PLN 600 for the purchase of drinks and food. 1. Draw Teresa's budget restraint line knowing that her favorite drink costs 5 zlotys per bottle and the dinner price is 20 zlotys. 2. How will Teresa's situation be affected by the increase in dinner price to PLN 25? 3. What will happen if the price of the drink is reduced to PLN 2.5? 4. Assess following quantitative combinations: •125 drinks i 20 dinners •80 drinks i 20 dinners •40 drinks i 20 dinnes
A worker receives a wage rate w and has L hours of leisure every day (the total endowment of hours is 24 hours per day). The government gives a subsidy of rate S of his income. The worker spends all his income. 1. Write a budget constraint of this individual and plot it. 2. Display graphically what is the optimal consumption-leisure choice for this worker. 3. Imagine that instead, the government imposes income tax at rate T. What is the new budget constraint? Display on the same picture. In the new optimum is the consumption higher? Explain the answer in terms of wealth and substitution effects.
JosephmigratedtoCanadafromGhana5yearsago.Hecurrently works in sales but is considering quitting work for two years to earn an MBA degree. His current job pays $40,000 per year (after taxes), but he could earn $55,000 per year (after taxes) if he had an MBA. Tuition is $10,000 per year, and the cost of an apartment near campus is equal to the $10,000 he is currently paying. His discount rate is 6 percent per year. He just turned 48 and plans to retire when he turns 60, whether or not he earns his MBA degree. Based on this information, should he go for an MBA degree? Explain carefully with appropriate calculations.
10) Graphically illustrate the TANF example with a 2,000-hour constraint between work and leisure and a $10 per hour wage rate. Illustrate two cases in the same graph, a guaranteed benefit of $5,000 and $3,000 with a benefit reduction rate of 50% in both cases. Identify the case of Sarah who reduces leisure when the guaranteed benefit is reduced from $5,000 to $3,000.
3. Consider a parent, with $200 in nonlabor income per week, who can earn $10 per hour working between 0 and 60 hours per week. If this parent decides to work at all, then high-quality day care will cost a fixed $100 per week. a) Draw the budget line for this parent. som show glatinñob (A b) Now suppose a welfare program is put in place to subsidize the cost of day care for parents working at least 20 hours per week. Suppose that as long as this parent earns less than $400 (i.e. works less than 40 hours), the full $100 cost is reimbursed. For those earning over $400 per week, the $100 rebate is reduced by $5 for every additional $10 earned (i.e. every additional hour worked), so that it is completely phased out for those earning $600 (i.e. working 60 hours). Draw a diagram that d reflects the budget line with this new program in place. (Don't worry about being exactly proportional, just capture the main features of the program.) low (8
Assume that a person earns $10 per hour and her non-labor income increases from $100 to$200. She also has 110 hours a week to decide either to work or leisure. a. Draw a budget constraint of this person.b. Draw an indifference curve to show the income and substitution effect of change innon-labor income. HINT: you can draw two separate graphs to show the effect ofsubstitution and income effects.
Problem 2 - Taxes A worker receives a wage rate w and has L hours of leisure every day (the total endowment of hours is 24 hours per day). The government gives a subsidy of rate S of his income. The worker spends all his income. 1. Write a budget constraint of this individual and plot it. 2. Display graphically what is the optimal consumption-leisure choice for this worker. 3. Imagine that instead, the government imposes income tax at rate T. What is the new budget constraint? Display on the same picture. In the new optimum is the consumption higher? Explain the answer in terms of wealth and substitution effects.