Homework Help is Here – Start Your Trial Now!
Business
Economics
Consider a society consisting of two people. Jake earns an income of $100,000 per year and Latasha earns an income of $25,000 per year. The government is considering a redistribution plan that would impose a 20% tax on Jake's income and give the revenue to Latasha. Without any incentive distortion, Jake would retain $80,000 and Latasha would end up with $45,000. However, let us assume that since Jake will not receive all the income he earns, he decides to work less and earn an income of only $85,000, of which 20 % x $85,000 $17,000 will be owed in taxes. With the redistribution plan, Jake will take home an income of s The $17,000 that Jake pays in taxes will be transferred by the government to Latasha. Let us assume that since Latasha now receives payment from the government, she will not work as many hours and will earn an income from work of only $23,000 instead of her initial $25,000. With the redistribution plan, Latasha's total income (including the government payment received) is now 1 Without a redistribution plan, total income in this society is s Therefore, the redistribution plan decreases According to the maximin criterion, the government should not After the redistribution plan is implemented, total income in this society total income in this society. implement this redistribution plan. Why? The plan benefits Latasha, who is the least well off member of society. The government is not entitled to take money away from one person and give it to another. Total societal utility will increase if the plan is enacted.

Consider a society consisting of two people. Jake earns an income of $100,000 per year and Latasha earns an income of $25,000 per year. The government is considering a redistribution plan that would impose a 20% tax on Jake's income and give the revenue to Latasha. Without any incentive distortion, Jake would retain $80,000 and Latasha would end up with $45,000. However, let us assume that since Jake will not receive all the income he earns, he decides to work less and earn an income of only $85,000, of which 20 % x $85,000 $17,000 will be owed in taxes. With the redistribution plan, Jake will take home an income of s The $17,000 that Jake pays in taxes will be transferred by the government to Latasha. Let us assume that since Latasha now receives payment from the government, she will not work as many hours and will earn an income from work of only $23,000 instead of her initial $25,000. With the redistribution plan, Latasha's total income (including the government payment received) is now 1 Without a redistribution plan, total income in this society is s Therefore, the redistribution plan decreases According to the maximin criterion, the government should not After the redistribution plan is implemented, total income in this society total income in this society. implement this redistribution plan. Why? The plan benefits Latasha, who is the least well off member of society. The government is not entitled to take money away from one person and give it to another. Total societal utility will increase if the plan is enacted.

Principles of Microeconomics
Principles of Microeconomics
7th Edition
ISBN:9781305156050
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:N. Gregory Mankiw
Chapter20: Income Inequality And Poverty
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 5PA
See similar textbooks
icon
Related questions
Question
Consider a society consisting of two people. Jake earns an income of $100,000 per year and Latasha earns an income of $25,000 per year. The government is considering a redistribution plan that would impose a 20% tax on Jake's income and give the revenue to Latasha. Without any incentive distortion, Jake would retain $80,000 and Latasha would end up with $45,000. However, let us assume that since Jake will not receive all the income he earns, he decides to work less and earn an income of only $85,000, of which 20 % x $85,000 $17,000 will be owed in taxes. With the redistribution plan, Jake will take home an income of The $17,000 that Jake pays in taxes will be transferred by the government to Latasha. Let us assume that since Latasha now receives payment from the government, she will not work as many hours and will earn an income from work of only $23,000 instead of her initial $25,000. With the redistribution plan, Latasha's total income (including the government payment received) is now 3 Without a redistribution plan, total income in this society is s Therefore, the redistribution plan decreases According to the maximin criterion, the government should not. After the redistribution plan is implemented, total income in this society total income in this society. Total societal utility will increase if the plan is enacted. implement this redistribution plan. Why? The plan benefits Latasha, who is the least well off member of society. The government is not entitled to take money away from one person and give it to another.
Transcribed Image Text:Consider a society consisting of two people. Jake earns an income of $100,000 per year and Latasha earns an income of $25,000 per year. The government is considering a redistribution plan that would impose a 20% tax on Jake's income and give the revenue to Latasha. Without any incentive distortion, Jake would retain $80,000 and Latasha would end up with $45,000. However, let us assume that since Jake will not receive all the income he earns, he decides to work less and earn an income of only $85,000, of which 20 % x $85,000 $17,000 will be owed in taxes. With the redistribution plan, Jake will take home an income of The $17,000 that Jake pays in taxes will be transferred by the government to Latasha. Let us assume that since Latasha now receives payment from the government, she will not work as many hours and will earn an income from work of only $23,000 instead of her initial $25,000. With the redistribution plan, Latasha's total income (including the government payment received) is now 3 Without a redistribution plan, total income in this society is s Therefore, the redistribution plan decreases According to the maximin criterion, the government should not. After the redistribution plan is implemented, total income in this society total income in this society. Total societal utility will increase if the plan is enacted. implement this redistribution plan. Why? The plan benefits Latasha, who is the least well off member of society. The government is not entitled to take money away from one person and give it to another.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 4 steps

SEE SOLUTIONCheck out a sample Q&A here
Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Income Security Program
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Principles of Microeconomics
Principles of Microeconomics
Economics
ISBN:
9781305156050
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Economics: Private and Public Choice (MindTap Cou…
Economics: Private and Public Choice (MindTap Cou…
Economics
ISBN:
9781305506725
Author:
James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. Macpherson
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Microeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa…
Microeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa…
Economics
ISBN:
9781305506893
Author:
James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. Macpherson
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:
9781337617383
Author:
Roger A. Arnold
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Microeconomics
Microeconomics
Economics
ISBN:
9781337617406
Author:
Roger A. Arnold
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS