By computing the sum of these areas of the smaller rectangles (Lg) and the sum of the areas of the larger rectangles (R8), we obtain better lower and upper estimates for A: 0.5468750 < A < 0.7968750. So one possible answer to the question is to say that the true area lies somewhere between 0.5468750 and 0.7968750. We could obtain better estimates by increasing the number of strips. The table at the left shows the results of similar calculations (with a computer) using n rectangles whose heights are found with left endpoints (Ln) or right endpoints (Rn). In particular, we see by using 50 strips that the area lies between 0.6468 and 0.6868. With 1000 strips, we narrow it down even more: A lies between 0.6656670 and 0.6676670. A good estimate is obtained by averaging these numbers: A =

Algebra & Trigonometry with Analytic Geometry
13th Edition
ISBN:9781133382119
Author:Swokowski
Publisher:Swokowski
Chapter1: Fundamental Concepts Of Algebra
Section1.4: Fractional Expressions
Problem 65E
icon
Related questions
Question
100%
y
y
(1, 2)
(1, 2)
y = 2 x?
1
1
8
(a) Using left endpoints
(b) Using right endpoints
By computing the sum of these areas of the smaller rectangles (L8) and the
sum of the areas of the larger rectangles (R8), we obtain better lower and
upper estimates for A:
0.5468750 < A < 0.7968750.
So one possible answer to the question is to say that the true area lies
somewhere between 0.5468750 and 0.7968750.
We could obtain better estimates by increasing the number of strips. The
table at the left shows the results of similar calculations (with a computer)
using n rectangles whose heights are found with left endpoints (Ln) or right
endpoints (Rn). In particular, we see by using 50 strips that the area lies
between 0.6468 and 0.6868. With 1000 strips, we narrow it down even more:
A lies between 0.6656670 and 0.6676670. A good estimate is obtained by
averaging these numbers: A =
HI CO
Transcribed Image Text:y y (1, 2) (1, 2) y = 2 x? 1 1 8 (a) Using left endpoints (b) Using right endpoints By computing the sum of these areas of the smaller rectangles (L8) and the sum of the areas of the larger rectangles (R8), we obtain better lower and upper estimates for A: 0.5468750 < A < 0.7968750. So one possible answer to the question is to say that the true area lies somewhere between 0.5468750 and 0.7968750. We could obtain better estimates by increasing the number of strips. The table at the left shows the results of similar calculations (with a computer) using n rectangles whose heights are found with left endpoints (Ln) or right endpoints (Rn). In particular, we see by using 50 strips that the area lies between 0.6468 and 0.6868. With 1000 strips, we narrow it down even more: A lies between 0.6656670 and 0.6676670. A good estimate is obtained by averaging these numbers: A = HI CO
Rn
Ln
10 0.5700000 0.7700000
20 0.6175000 0.7175000
30 0.6337037 | 0.7003704
50 0.6468000 0.6868000
100 0.6567000 0.6767000
1000 0.6656670 | 0.6676670
Transcribed Image Text:Rn Ln 10 0.5700000 0.7700000 20 0.6175000 0.7175000 30 0.6337037 | 0.7003704 50 0.6468000 0.6868000 100 0.6567000 0.6767000 1000 0.6656670 | 0.6676670
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps with 1 images

Blurred answer
Recommended textbooks for you
Algebra & Trigonometry with Analytic Geometry
Algebra & Trigonometry with Analytic Geometry
Algebra
ISBN:
9781133382119
Author:
Swokowski
Publisher:
Cengage
College Algebra (MindTap Course List)
College Algebra (MindTap Course List)
Algebra
ISBN:
9781305652231
Author:
R. David Gustafson, Jeff Hughes
Publisher:
Cengage Learning