Homework Help is Here – Start Your Trial Now!
Math
Statistics
Assuming the requirements are met for the teenage smoking study and x = 0.05, what is the correct conclusion for testing the claim that the proportion of US teenagers between the ages of 13 and 17 who smoke has increased? As the P-value is less than a, we reject the null hypothesis. Thus, there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of US teenagers between the ages of 13 and 17 who smoke has increased. As the P-value is less than a, we reject the null hypothesis. Thus, there is insufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of US teenagers between the ages of 13 and 17 who smoke has increased. As the P-value is less than a, we fail to reject the null hypothesis. Thus, there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of US teenagers between the ages of 13 and 17 who smoke has increased. As the P-value is less than a, we fail to reject the null hypothesis. Thus, there is insufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of US teenagers between the ages of 13 and 17 who smoke has increased. As the P-value is greater than a, we reject the null hypothesis. Thus, there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of US teenagers between the ages of 13 and 17 who smoke has increased. O As the P-value is greater than a, we reject the null hypothesis. Thus, there is insufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of US teenagers between the ages of 13 and 17 who smoke has increased. As the P-value is greater than a, we fail to reject the null hypothesis. Thus, there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of US teenagers between the ages of 13 and 17 who smoke has increased. As the P-value is greater than a, we fail to reject the null hypothesis. Thus, there is insufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of US teenagers between the ages of 13 and 17 who smoke has increased.

Assuming the requirements are met for the teenage smoking study and x = 0.05, what is the correct conclusion for testing the claim that the proportion of US teenagers between the ages of 13 and 17 who smoke has increased? As the P-value is less than a, we reject the null hypothesis. Thus, there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of US teenagers between the ages of 13 and 17 who smoke has increased. As the P-value is less than a, we reject the null hypothesis. Thus, there is insufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of US teenagers between the ages of 13 and 17 who smoke has increased. As the P-value is less than a, we fail to reject the null hypothesis. Thus, there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of US teenagers between the ages of 13 and 17 who smoke has increased. As the P-value is less than a, we fail to reject the null hypothesis. Thus, there is insufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of US teenagers between the ages of 13 and 17 who smoke has increased. As the P-value is greater than a, we reject the null hypothesis. Thus, there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of US teenagers between the ages of 13 and 17 who smoke has increased. O As the P-value is greater than a, we reject the null hypothesis. Thus, there is insufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of US teenagers between the ages of 13 and 17 who smoke has increased. As the P-value is greater than a, we fail to reject the null hypothesis. Thus, there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of US teenagers between the ages of 13 and 17 who smoke has increased. As the P-value is greater than a, we fail to reject the null hypothesis. Thus, there is insufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of US teenagers between the ages of 13 and 17 who smoke has increased.

Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897, 0079039898, 2018
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897, 0079039898, 2018
18th Edition
ISBN:9780079039897
Author:Carter
Publisher:Carter
Chapter4: Equations Of Linear Functions
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 8SGR
See similar textbooks
icon
Related questions
Question
Previous research showed that 15% percent of teenagers between the ages of 13 and 17 smoke. A study was conducted to examine the current proportion of US teenagers between the ages of 13 and 17 who smoke. A survey asked a random sample of 785 teenagers between the ages of 13 to 17 if they smoke. 71 of the surveyed teenagers responded that they smoke. The information above is for the question below.
Assuming the requirements are met for the teenage smoking study and α = 0.05, what is the correct conclusion for testing the claim that the proportion of US teenagers between the ages of 13 and 17 who smoke has increased? As the P-value is less than a, we reject the null hypothesis. Thus, there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of US teenagers between the ages of 13 and 17 who smoke has increased. As the P-value is less than a, we reject the null hypothesis. Thus, there is insufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of US teenagers between the ages of 13 and 17 who smoke has increased. As the P-value is less than a, we fail to reject the null hypothesis. Thus, there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of US teenagers between the ages of 13 and 17 who smoke has increased. As the P-value is less than a, we fail to reject the null hypothesis. Thus, there is insufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of US teenagers between the ages of 13 and 17 who smoke has increased. As the P-value is greater than x, we reject the null hypothesis. Thus, there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of US teenagers between the ages of 13 and 17 who smoke has increased. As the P-value is greater than a, we reject the null hypothesis. Thus, there is insufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of US teenagers between the ages of 13 and 17 who smoke has increased. As the P-value is greater than x, we fail to reject the null hypothesis. Thus, there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of US teenagers between the ages of 13 and 17 who smoke has increased. As the P-value is greater than a, we fail to reject the null hypothesis. Thus, there is insufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of US teenagers between the ages of 13 and 17 who smoke has increased.
Transcribed Image Text:Assuming the requirements are met for the teenage smoking study and α = 0.05, what is the correct conclusion for testing the claim that the proportion of US teenagers between the ages of 13 and 17 who smoke has increased? As the P-value is less than a, we reject the null hypothesis. Thus, there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of US teenagers between the ages of 13 and 17 who smoke has increased. As the P-value is less than a, we reject the null hypothesis. Thus, there is insufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of US teenagers between the ages of 13 and 17 who smoke has increased. As the P-value is less than a, we fail to reject the null hypothesis. Thus, there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of US teenagers between the ages of 13 and 17 who smoke has increased. As the P-value is less than a, we fail to reject the null hypothesis. Thus, there is insufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of US teenagers between the ages of 13 and 17 who smoke has increased. As the P-value is greater than x, we reject the null hypothesis. Thus, there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of US teenagers between the ages of 13 and 17 who smoke has increased. As the P-value is greater than a, we reject the null hypothesis. Thus, there is insufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of US teenagers between the ages of 13 and 17 who smoke has increased. As the P-value is greater than x, we fail to reject the null hypothesis. Thus, there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of US teenagers between the ages of 13 and 17 who smoke has increased. As the P-value is greater than a, we fail to reject the null hypothesis. Thus, there is insufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of US teenagers between the ages of 13 and 17 who smoke has increased.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 4 steps with 1 images

SEE SOLUTIONCheck out a sample Q&A here
Blurred answer
Recommended textbooks for you
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780079039897
Author:
Carter
Publisher:
McGraw Hill
SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS