An agronomist is evaluating the resistance to insect herbivory of a two genetically modified strains of soybean (GM1 and GM2) vs. an unmodified control strain. Fields 1 and 4 are planted with GM1 soybean, fields 2 and 5 are planted with GM2 soybean and fields 3 and 6 are planted with the control strain of soybean. Within each field 20 soybean plants are randomly selected and the proportion of leaves on each plant that have suffered insect damage is quantified. The unit of observation in this study is the individual soybean plant. Evaluate the null hypothesis that there is no difference in insect damage between the three strains of soybean. The data from this experiment is pictured below. A. Identify the appropriate statistical test to evaluate the stated null hypothesis. Explain why this test is appropriate, based upon the types of independent and dependent variables, the structure of the data and any relevant assumptions of statistical tests. You should be lenient when it comes to interpreting the normality assumption on this problem. B. Conduct the statistical test that you have chosen. Provide your R script and output. State your conclusions concerning the null hypothesis. PintID Strain FieldID PropDam 1 GM1 0.28 2 GM1 65 GM2 5 0 66 GM2 5 0 3 GMI 0 1 GM1 0.29 67 GM2 5 0.27 5 GM1 0.08 68 GM2 5 0.11 6 GM1 0 69 GM2 5 0.19 7 GM1 0.45 70 GM2 5 0.21 8 GM1 0.21 71 GM2 5 0 9 GMI 0.36 72 GM2 5 0.28 10 GMI 0.28 73 GM2 5 0.16 11 GM1 0.22 74 GM2 5 0.38 12 GM1 0.53 75 GM2 5 0.34 13 GM1 0.08 76 GM2 5 0.28 14 GM1 0.08 15 GM1 0.05 77 GM2 5 0.16 16 GM1 0.26 78 GM2 5 0 17 GM1 0.1 79 GM2 5 0.03 18 GM1 0 80 GM2 5 0.49 19 GMI 0.13 81 CON 3 0.77 20 GM1 0.36 82 CON 3 0.52 21 GM1 0 83 CON 3 0.19 22 GM1 0.23 84 CON 3 0.88 23 GM1 0 85 CON 3 0.2 24 GM1 0.27 86 CON 3 0.62 25 GM1 0 26 GM1 0 87 CON 3 0.41 27 GM1 0.07 88 CON 3 0.48 28 GM1 0 89 CON 3 0.32 29 GMI 0.61 90 CON 3 0.67 30 GM1 0.38 91 CON 3 0.93 31 GM1 0.15. 92 CON 3 0.61 32 GM1 0.18 93 CON 3 0.68 33 GM1 0.25 94 CON 3 0.39 34 GM1 0.09 95 CON 3 0.32 35 GM1 0.31 36 GM1 0.34 96 CON 3 0.4 37 GM1 0.1 97 CON 3 0.58 38 GM1 0.26 98 CON 3 0.31 39 GMI 0.09 99 CON 3 0.45 40 GM1 0.21 100 CON 3 0.4 41 GM2 2 0.11 101 CON 6 0.38 42 GM2 2 0.14 102 CON 6 0.22 43 GM2 2 0.23 103 CON 6 0.59 44 GM2 2 0.09 104 CON 6 0.37 45 GM2 2 0.26 105 CON 6 46 GM2 2 0.94 0.12 47 GM2 2 0.11 106 CON 6 0.86 48 GM2 2 0.37 107 CON 6 49 GM2 2 0.15 108 CON 6 0 50 GM2 2 0.05 109 CON 6 0.23 51 GM2 2 0.32 110 CON 6 0 52 GM2 2 0.16 111 CON 6 0.43 53 GM2 2 0.05 112 CON 6 0.53 54 GM2 2 0 113 CON 6 0.44 55 GM2 2 0.14 114 CON 6 0.58 56 GM2 2 0 57 GM2 2 115 CON 6 0.3 0.08 58 GM2 2 0.15 116 CON 6 0.18 59 GM2 2 0 117 CON 6 0.16 60 GM2 2 0.13 118 CON 6 0.05 61 GM2 5 0.02 119 CON 6 0.4 62 GM2 5 0.06 120 CON 6 0.37 63 GM2 5 0.08 64 GM2 5 0

FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
10th Edition
ISBN:9781259964947
Author:Libby
Publisher:Libby
Chapter1: Financial Statements And Business Decisions
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1Q
icon
Related questions
Question
An agronomist is evaluating the resistance to insect herbivory of a two genetically modified strains of soybean (GM1 and
GM2) vs. an unmodified control strain. Fields 1 and 4 are planted with GM1 soybean, fields 2 and 5 are planted with
GM2 soybean and fields 3 and 6 are planted with the control strain of soybean. Within each field 20 soybean plants are
randomly selected and the proportion of leaves on each plant that have suffered insect damage is quantified. The unit of
observation in this study is the individual soybean plant. Evaluate the null hypothesis that there is no difference in insect
damage between the three strains of soybean. The data from this experiment is pictured below. A. Identify the
appropriate statistical test to evaluate the stated null hypothesis. Explain why this test is appropriate, based upon the
types of independent and dependent variables, the structure of the data and any relevant assumptions of statistical tests.
You should be lenient when it comes to interpreting the normality assumption on this problem. B. Conduct the statistical
test that you have chosen. Provide your R script and output. State your conclusions concerning the null hypothesis.
PintID
Strain
FieldID
PropDam
1 GM1
0.28
2 GM1
65 GM2
5
0
66 GM2
5
0
3 GMI
0
1 GM1
0.29
67 GM2
5
0.27
5 GM1
0.08
68 GM2
5
0.11
6 GM1
0
69 GM2
5
0.19
7 GM1
0.45
70 GM2
5
0.21
8 GM1
0.21
71 GM2
5
0
9 GMI
0.36
72 GM2
5
0.28
10 GMI
0.28
73 GM2
5
0.16
11 GM1
0.22
74 GM2
5
0.38
12 GM1
0.53
75 GM2
5
0.34
13 GM1
0.08
76 GM2
5
0.28
14 GM1
0.08
15 GM1
0.05
77 GM2
5
0.16
16 GM1
0.26
78 GM2
5
0
17
GM1
0.1
79 GM2
5
0.03
18 GM1
0
80 GM2
5
0.49
19
GMI
0.13
81 CON
3
0.77
20 GM1
0.36
82 CON
3
0.52
21 GM1
0
83 CON
3
0.19
22 GM1
0.23
84 CON
3
0.88
23 GM1
0
85 CON
3
0.2
24 GM1
0.27
86 CON
3
0.62
25 GM1
0
26 GM1
0
87 CON
3
0.41
27 GM1
0.07
88 CON
3
0.48
28 GM1
0
89 CON
3
0.32
29 GMI
0.61
90 CON
3
0.67
30 GM1
0.38
91 CON
3
0.93
31 GM1
0.15.
92 CON
3
0.61
32 GM1
0.18
93 CON
3
0.68
33 GM1
0.25
94 CON
3
0.39
34 GM1
0.09
95 CON
3
0.32
35 GM1
0.31
36 GM1
0.34
96 CON
3
0.4
37 GM1
0.1
97 CON
3
0.58
38 GM1
0.26
98 CON
3
0.31
39 GMI
0.09
99 CON
3
0.45
40 GM1
0.21
100 CON
3
0.4
41 GM2
2
0.11
101 CON
6
0.38
42 GM2
2
0.14
102 CON
6
0.22
43 GM2
2
0.23
103 CON
6
0.59
44 GM2
2
0.09
104 CON
6
0.37
45 GM2
2
0.26
105 CON
6
46 GM2
2
0.94
0.12
47 GM2
2
0.11
106 CON
6
0.86
48 GM2
2
0.37
107 CON
6
49 GM2
2
0.15
108 CON
6
0
50 GM2
2
0.05
109 CON
6
0.23
51 GM2
2
0.32
110 CON
6
0
52 GM2
2
0.16
111 CON
6
0.43
53 GM2
2
0.05
112 CON
6
0.53
54 GM2
2
0
113 CON
6
0.44
55 GM2
2
0.14
114 CON
6
0.58
56 GM2
2
0
57 GM2
2
115 CON
6
0.3
0.08
58 GM2
2
0.15
116 CON
6
0.18
59 GM2
2
0
117 CON
6
0.16
60 GM2
2
0.13
118 CON
6
0.05
61 GM2
5
0.02
119 CON
6
0.4
62 GM2
5
0.06
120 CON
6
0.37
63 GM2
5
0.08
64 GM2
5
0
Transcribed Image Text:An agronomist is evaluating the resistance to insect herbivory of a two genetically modified strains of soybean (GM1 and GM2) vs. an unmodified control strain. Fields 1 and 4 are planted with GM1 soybean, fields 2 and 5 are planted with GM2 soybean and fields 3 and 6 are planted with the control strain of soybean. Within each field 20 soybean plants are randomly selected and the proportion of leaves on each plant that have suffered insect damage is quantified. The unit of observation in this study is the individual soybean plant. Evaluate the null hypothesis that there is no difference in insect damage between the three strains of soybean. The data from this experiment is pictured below. A. Identify the appropriate statistical test to evaluate the stated null hypothesis. Explain why this test is appropriate, based upon the types of independent and dependent variables, the structure of the data and any relevant assumptions of statistical tests. You should be lenient when it comes to interpreting the normality assumption on this problem. B. Conduct the statistical test that you have chosen. Provide your R script and output. State your conclusions concerning the null hypothesis. PintID Strain FieldID PropDam 1 GM1 0.28 2 GM1 65 GM2 5 0 66 GM2 5 0 3 GMI 0 1 GM1 0.29 67 GM2 5 0.27 5 GM1 0.08 68 GM2 5 0.11 6 GM1 0 69 GM2 5 0.19 7 GM1 0.45 70 GM2 5 0.21 8 GM1 0.21 71 GM2 5 0 9 GMI 0.36 72 GM2 5 0.28 10 GMI 0.28 73 GM2 5 0.16 11 GM1 0.22 74 GM2 5 0.38 12 GM1 0.53 75 GM2 5 0.34 13 GM1 0.08 76 GM2 5 0.28 14 GM1 0.08 15 GM1 0.05 77 GM2 5 0.16 16 GM1 0.26 78 GM2 5 0 17 GM1 0.1 79 GM2 5 0.03 18 GM1 0 80 GM2 5 0.49 19 GMI 0.13 81 CON 3 0.77 20 GM1 0.36 82 CON 3 0.52 21 GM1 0 83 CON 3 0.19 22 GM1 0.23 84 CON 3 0.88 23 GM1 0 85 CON 3 0.2 24 GM1 0.27 86 CON 3 0.62 25 GM1 0 26 GM1 0 87 CON 3 0.41 27 GM1 0.07 88 CON 3 0.48 28 GM1 0 89 CON 3 0.32 29 GMI 0.61 90 CON 3 0.67 30 GM1 0.38 91 CON 3 0.93 31 GM1 0.15. 92 CON 3 0.61 32 GM1 0.18 93 CON 3 0.68 33 GM1 0.25 94 CON 3 0.39 34 GM1 0.09 95 CON 3 0.32 35 GM1 0.31 36 GM1 0.34 96 CON 3 0.4 37 GM1 0.1 97 CON 3 0.58 38 GM1 0.26 98 CON 3 0.31 39 GMI 0.09 99 CON 3 0.45 40 GM1 0.21 100 CON 3 0.4 41 GM2 2 0.11 101 CON 6 0.38 42 GM2 2 0.14 102 CON 6 0.22 43 GM2 2 0.23 103 CON 6 0.59 44 GM2 2 0.09 104 CON 6 0.37 45 GM2 2 0.26 105 CON 6 46 GM2 2 0.94 0.12 47 GM2 2 0.11 106 CON 6 0.86 48 GM2 2 0.37 107 CON 6 49 GM2 2 0.15 108 CON 6 0 50 GM2 2 0.05 109 CON 6 0.23 51 GM2 2 0.32 110 CON 6 0 52 GM2 2 0.16 111 CON 6 0.43 53 GM2 2 0.05 112 CON 6 0.53 54 GM2 2 0 113 CON 6 0.44 55 GM2 2 0.14 114 CON 6 0.58 56 GM2 2 0 57 GM2 2 115 CON 6 0.3 0.08 58 GM2 2 0.15 116 CON 6 0.18 59 GM2 2 0 117 CON 6 0.16 60 GM2 2 0.13 118 CON 6 0.05 61 GM2 5 0.02 119 CON 6 0.4 62 GM2 5 0.06 120 CON 6 0.37 63 GM2 5 0.08 64 GM2 5 0
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Recommended textbooks for you
FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
Accounting
ISBN:
9781259964947
Author:
Libby
Publisher:
MCG
Accounting
Accounting
Accounting
ISBN:
9781337272094
Author:
WARREN, Carl S., Reeve, James M., Duchac, Jonathan E.
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,
Accounting Information Systems
Accounting Information Systems
Accounting
ISBN:
9781337619202
Author:
Hall, James A.
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,
Horngren's Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis…
Horngren's Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis…
Accounting
ISBN:
9780134475585
Author:
Srikant M. Datar, Madhav V. Rajan
Publisher:
PEARSON
Intermediate Accounting
Intermediate Accounting
Accounting
ISBN:
9781259722660
Author:
J. David Spiceland, Mark W. Nelson, Wayne M Thomas
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Financial and Managerial Accounting
Financial and Managerial Accounting
Accounting
ISBN:
9781259726705
Author:
John J Wild, Ken W. Shaw, Barbara Chiappetta Fundamental Accounting Principles
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education