tise or nột to advertiseSuppose that Fizzo and Pop Hop are the only two firms that sell orange soda. The following payoff matrix shows the profit (in millions of dollars) eachcompany will earn depending on whether or not it advertises:Pop HopAdvertise Doesn't AdvertiseAdvertise8, 815, 2FizzoDoesn't Advertise2, 1511, 11For example, the upper right cell shows that if Fizzo advertises and Pop Hop doesn't advertise, Fizzo will make a profit of $15 million, and Pop Hop willmake a profit of $2 million. Assume this is a simultaneous game and that Fizzo and Pop Hop are both profit-maximizing firms.million if Pop Hop advertises and a profit of $million if Pop Hop does notIf Fizzo decides to advertise, it will earn a profit of $advertise.million if Pop Hop does notmillion if Pop Hop advertises and a profit of $If Fizzo decides not to advertise, it will earn a profit of $advertise.TE Don Uenad orticoc Fizze makoc a hiabo nrefit RS R choecesacer ng.cengage.com/static/nb/ui/evo/index.html?deploymentld%3598281800483229979995799&elSBN=9780357133606&id=1061548135&snapshotld=2200166&If Fizzo decides not to advertise, it will earn a profit of $million if Pop Hop advertises and a profit of $million if Pop Hop does notadvertise.If Pop Hop advertises, Fizzo makes a higher profit if it choosesIf Pop Hop doesn't advertise, Fizzo makes a higher profit if it choosesSuppose that both firms start off not advertising. If the firms act independently, what strategies will they end up choosing?Fizzo will choose to advertise and Pop Hop will choose not to advertise.Both firms will choose to advertise.Both firms will choose not to advertise.Fizzo will choose not to advertise and Pop Hop will choose to advertise.Again, suppose that both firms start off not advertising. If the firms decide to collude, what strategies will they end up choosing?Fizzo will choose not to advertise and Pop Hop will choose to advertise.Both firms will choose to advertise.Fizzo will choose to advertise and Pop Hop will choose not to advertise.Both firms will choose not to advertise.acer

Since you have posted a question with multiple sub-parts, we will solve the first 3 sub-parts for…

Advertise Doesn't Advertise Advertise 8, 8 15, 2 Fizzo Doesn't Advertise 2, 15 11, 11 For example, the upper right cell shows that if Fizzo advertises and Pop Hop doesn't advertise, Fizzo will make a profit of $15 million, and Pop Hop will make a profit of $2 million. Assume this is a simultaneous game and that Fizzo and Pop Hop are both profit-maximizing firms. million if Pop Hop advertises and a profit of $ million if Pop Hop does not If Fizzo decides to advertise, it will earn a profit of $ advertise. million if Pop Hop does not million if Pop Hop advertises and a profit of $ If Fizzo decides not to advertise, it will earn a profit of $ advertise.

Advertise Doesn't Advertise Advertise 8, 8 15, 2 Fizzo Doesn't Advertise 2, 15 11, 11 For example, the upper right cell shows that if Fizzo advertises and Pop Hop doesn't advertise, Fizzo will make a profit of $15 million, and Pop Hop will make a profit of $2 million. Assume this is a simultaneous game and that Fizzo and Pop Hop are both profit-maximizing firms. million if Pop Hop advertises and a profit of $ million if Pop Hop does not If Fizzo decides to advertise, it will earn a profit of $ advertise. million if Pop Hop does not million if Pop Hop advertises and a profit of $ If Fizzo decides not to advertise, it will earn a profit of $ advertise.

Principles of Microeconomics (MindTap Course List)

8th Edition

ISBN:9781305971493

Author:N. Gregory Mankiw

Publisher:N. Gregory Mankiw

Chapter17: Oligopoly

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 9PA

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Sometimes oligopolies in the same industry are very different in size. Suppose we have a duopoly where one firm (Film A) is large and the other film (Film B) is small, as the prisoners dilemma box in Table 10.4 shows. Assuming that both films know the payoffs, what is the likely outcome in this case?
Does each individual in a prisoners dilemma benefit more from cooperation or from pursuing self-interest? Explain briefly.
4. Suppose in 1977 Honda and Toyota each have to decide whether to build an automobile plant in the North American market. The payoff matrix below shows Honda's payoff on the left, and Toyota's on the right. Is there a Nash equilibrium? If so, where, and how do you know? Тoyota Build small Don't build anything plant Build small 16, 16 20, 15 Honda plant Don't build anything 15, 20 18, 18
fnan421 WWord Gozden Geç r Gorunum Varc m Ne yaomak steci gnz soy evn 1) Two firms, X and Y, are planning to market their new products. Each firm can develop either TV or Laptop. Market research indicates that the resulting profits to each firm for the alternative strategies are given by the following payoff matrix: FIRM Y TV LAPTOP FIRM X TV 30, 30 50, 35 LAPTOP 40,70 20, 20 A) If both firms make their decisions at the same time and follow maximin (low-risk) strategies, what will the outcome be? B) Suppose both firms try to maximize profits, but Firm X has a head start in planning, and can commit first. Now what will the outcome be? What will the outcome be if Firm Y has a head start in planning and can commit first? I
Consider the payoff matrix of Hulu and Netflix. Why don't both firms just raise prices? NETFLIX HULU 15, 15 8, 20 20, 8 10, 10 O It is in each firm's profitable interest to lower prices, no matter what the other competitor does. O Raising prices is illegal in this case. O Firms are concerned about a third competitor entering at higher prices. O Higher prices will increase the number of customers beyond what the firms can handle.
8. To advertise or not to advertise Suppose that Creamland and Dairy King are the only two firms that sell ice cream. The following payoff matrix shows the profit (in millions of dollars) each company will earn depending on whether or not it advertises: Creamland Dairy King Advertises Doesn't Advertise 9,9 Doesn't Advertise 3, 15 Advertises 15, 3 11, 11 For example, the upper-right cell shows that, if Creamland advertises and Dairy King doesn't advertise, Creamland will make a profit of $15 million, and Dairy King will make a profit of $3 million. Assume this is a simultaneous game and that Creamland and Dairy King are both profit-maximizing firms. If Creamland decides to advertise, it will earn a profit of $ not advertise. If Creamland decides not to advertise, it will earn a profit of $ does not advertise. million if Dairy King advertises and a profit of $ If Dairy King advertises, Creamland makes a higher profit if it chooses million if Dairy King advertises and a profit of $…
◄ Search 12:47 PM Sun Nov 12 ← Note Nov 12, 2023 Uptown's price strategy The Nash equilibrium occurs when High Low LED RareAir's price strategy High $12 $15 The more favorable outcome would be for $12 Tt ✪ $6 B Low $6 D $8. $15 $8 S O both firms have an incentive to deviate from this strategy given the strategy of the competing firm. It is shown by the dominant strategy of cell A. 92% neither firm has an incentive to deviate from this strategy given the strategy of the competing firm. It is shown by the dominant strategy of cell D. O one firm consistently has an incentive to deviate from this strategy given the strategy of the competing firm. It is shown by the high-price strategy of cell B. O one firm consistently has an incentive to deviate from this strategy given the strategy of the competing firm. It is shown by the high-price strategy of cell C. O the firms to collude and use the high-price strategy but this strategy requires cooperation. O one firm to take the lead and let the…
5. To advertise or not to advertise Suppose that two firms, Hatte Latte and Bean Bruuer, are the only sellers of espresso in some hypothetical market. The following payoff matrix gives the profit (in millions of dollars) earned by each company depending on whether or not it chooses to advertise: Hatte Latte Advertise Doesn't Advertise Advertise 10, 10 Bean Bruuer 2,18 Doesn't Advertise 18, 2 11, 11 For example, the lower left cell of the matrix shows that if Bean Bruuer advertises and Hatte Latte does not advertise, Bean Bruuer will make a profit of $18 million, and Hatte Latte will make a profit of $2 million. Assume this is a simultaneous game and that Hatte Latte and Bean Bruuer are both profit-maximizing firms. If Hatte Latte chooses to advertise, it will earn a profit of $ does not advertise. If Hatte Latte chooses not to advertise, it will earn a profit of $ Bruuer does not advertise. million if Bean Bruuer advertises and a profit of $ million if Bean Bruuer advertises and a…
20) Given the payoff matrix in the figure, the Nash equilibrium outcome of this game is for: Ajinomoto Produce 30 Produce 40 million pounds million pounds Ajinomoto makes $180 million Ajinomoto makes $200 million Produce 30 million ADM makes $180 million ADM makes $150 million pounds Ajinomoto makes $150 million Ajinomoto makes $160 million Produce 40 million ADM makes $200 million ADM makes $160 million pounds O A. each firm to produce 30 million pounds. B. each firm to produce 40 million pounds. C. ADM to produce 30 million pounds and for Ajinomoto to produce 40 million pounds. D. ADM to produce 40 million pounds and for Ajinomoto to produce 30 million pounds. ADM
15. Consider two competing firms, JR and OG. Suppose OG produces an estab- lished product and JR can either produce a clone or a differentiated product. If JR produces a clone, OG can either sue JR or not sue it. If JR produces a differentiated product rather than a clone, OG can either buy JR or not buy it. The two firms are in a non-cooperative game whose extensive form is rep- resented in the tree diagram below, where the payoffs on the right represent profits. -1 for OG 1 for JR sue OG don't -2 for OG clone sue 1 for JR JR don't clone 1 for OG -1 for JR buy OG don't buy 2 for OG 0 for JR If the two firms' managers are rational and recognize each other as rational, then (a) JR clones and OG sues (b) JR does not clone and OG buys (c) JR does not clone and OG does not buy (d) JR clones and OG does not sue (e) JR clones and OG sues with probability .5
You are playing a game with a friend. It’s yourmove but you don’t have a dominant strategy.Your payoff depends on what your friend doesafter your move. You consider flipping a coin todecide what to do. You are about to reach for acoin, but then you realize that your friend has adominant strategy. Explain how using backwardinduction (rather than a coin toss) will now determine your next move
fnan421 Word Gozden Geçir Górunum Vard m e vaomak sted nz sOv eyin 1) Two firms, X and Y, are planning to market their new products. Each firm can develop either TV or Laptop. Market research indicates that the resulting profits to each firm for the alternative strategies are given by the following payoff matrix: FIRM Y TV LAPTOP FIRM X TV 30, 30 20, 35 LAPTOP 40,70 20, 20 A) What is the cooperative outcome? B) Which firm benefits most from the cooperative outcome? How much would that firm need to offer the other?