A researcher wants to know whether athletic women are more flexible than HOK-amet Flexibility is measured in inches on a sit & reach box. Test the researcher's claim using the summary statistics below. Assume that all conditions for testing have been met. Report the test statistic a the 1% significance level, state your decision regarding the null hypothesis and your conclusion about the original claim. Round all values to three decimal places. Click the icon to view the summary statistics OA. t= -1.623; p=0.054; Reject the null hypothesis, there is strong evidence to suggest that athletic women are more flexible than non-athletic women OB. t= 1.623; p = 0.055, Fail to reject the null hypothesis; there is not strong evidence to suggest that athletic women are more flexible than non-athletic women OC. t=1.623, p=0.108; Reject the null hypothesis; there is not strong evidence to suggest that athletic women are more flexible than non-athletic women. O D. t= -1.623, p = 0.108; Reject the null hypothesis, there is strong evidence to suggest that athletic women are more flexible than non-athletic women. Summary statistics Athletic Women n=50 x=5.0 inches s=1.4 inches Non-Athletic Women CI n=30 x=4.6 inches s=0.8 inches - X

A researcher wants to know whether athletic women are more flexible than HOK-amet Flexibility is measured in inches on a sit & reach box. Test the researcher's claim using the summary statistics below. Assume that all conditions for testing have been met. Report the test statistic a the 1% significance level, state your decision regarding the null hypothesis and your conclusion about the original claim. Round all values to three decimal places. Click the icon to view the summary statistics OA. t= -1.623; p=0.054; Reject the null hypothesis, there is strong evidence to suggest that athletic women are more flexible than non-athletic women OB. t= 1.623; p = 0.055, Fail to reject the null hypothesis; there is not strong evidence to suggest that athletic women are more flexible than non-athletic women OC. t=1.623, p=0.108; Reject the null hypothesis; there is not strong evidence to suggest that athletic women are more flexible than non-athletic women. O D. t= -1.623, p = 0.108; Reject the null hypothesis, there is strong evidence to suggest that athletic women are more flexible than non-athletic women. Summary statistics Athletic Women n=50 x=5.0 inches s=1.4 inches Non-Athletic Women CI n=30 x=4.6 inches s=0.8 inches - X

Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897, 0079039898, 2018

18th Edition

ISBN:9780079039897

Author:Carter

Publisher:Carter

Chapter10: Statistics

Section10.3: Measures Of Spread

Problem 1GP

See similar textbooks