A lumber company has just taken delivery on a shipment of 10,000 2 ✕ 4 boards. Suppose that 30% of these boards (3000) are actually too green to be used in first-quality construction. Two boards are selected at random, one after the other. Let A = {the first board is green} and B = {the second board is green}. (a) Compute P(A), P(B), and P(A ∩ B) (a tree diagram might help). (Round your answer for P(A ∩ B)
A lumber company has just taken delivery on a shipment of 10,000 2 ✕ 4 boards. Suppose that 30% of these boards (3000) are actually too green to be used in first-quality construction. Two boards are selected at random, one after the other. Let A = {the first board is green} and B = {the second board is green}. (a) Compute P(A), P(B), and P(A ∩ B) (a tree diagram might help). (Round your answer for P(A ∩ B)
Linear Algebra: A Modern Introduction
4th Edition
ISBN:9781285463247
Author:David Poole
Publisher:David Poole
Chapter2: Systems Of Linear Equations
Section2.4: Applications
Problem 28EQ
Related questions
Question
A lumber company has just taken delivery on a shipment of 10,000 2 ✕ 4 boards. Suppose that 30% of these boards (3000) are actually too green to be used in first-quality construction. Two boards are selected at random, one after the other. Let A = {the first board is green} and B = {the second board is green}.
(a) Compute P(A), P(B), and P(A ∩ B) (a tree diagram might help). (Round your answer for P(A ∩ B) to five decimal places.)
Are A and B independent?
(b) With A and B independent and P(A) = P(B) = 0.3, what is P(A ∩ B)?
How much difference is there between this answer and P(A ∩ B) in part (a)?
For purposes of calculating P(A ∩ B), can we assume that A and B of part (a) are independent to obtain essentially the correct probability?
(c) Suppose the lot consists of ten boards, of which three are green. Does the assumption of independence now yield approximately the correct answer for P(A ∩ B)?
What is the critical difference between the situation here and that of part (a)?
When do you think that an independence assumption would be valid in obtaining an approximately correct answer to P(A ∩ B)?
P(A) | = |
P(B) | = |
P(A ∩ B) | = |
Are A and B independent?
Yes, the two events are independent.No, the two events are not independent.
(b) With A and B independent and P(A) = P(B) = 0.3, what is P(A ∩ B)?
How much difference is there between this answer and P(A ∩ B) in part (a)?
There is no difference.There is very little difference. There is a very large difference.
For purposes of calculating P(A ∩ B), can we assume that A and B of part (a) are independent to obtain essentially the correct probability?
YesNo
(c) Suppose the lot consists of ten boards, of which three are green. Does the assumption of independence now yield approximately the correct answer for P(A ∩ B)?
YesNo
What is the critical difference between the situation here and that of part (a)?
The critical difference is that the population size in part (a) is small compared to the random sample of two boards.The critical difference is that the population size in part (a) is huge compared to the random sample of two boards. The critical difference is that the percentage of green boards is smaller in part (a).The critical difference is that the percentage of green boards is larger in part (a).
When do you think that an independence assumption would be valid in obtaining an approximately correct answer to P(A ∩ B)?
This assumption would be valid when there are fewer green boards in the sample.This assumption would be valid when there are more green boards in the sample. This assumption would be valid when the sample size is very large.This assumption would be valid when the population is much larger than the sample size.
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps with 3 images
Recommended textbooks for you
Linear Algebra: A Modern Introduction
Algebra
ISBN:
9781285463247
Author:
David Poole
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Algebra & Trigonometry with Analytic Geometry
Algebra
ISBN:
9781133382119
Author:
Swokowski
Publisher:
Cengage
College Algebra (MindTap Course List)
Algebra
ISBN:
9781305652231
Author:
R. David Gustafson, Jeff Hughes
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Linear Algebra: A Modern Introduction
Algebra
ISBN:
9781285463247
Author:
David Poole
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Algebra & Trigonometry with Analytic Geometry
Algebra
ISBN:
9781133382119
Author:
Swokowski
Publisher:
Cengage
College Algebra (MindTap Course List)
Algebra
ISBN:
9781305652231
Author:
R. David Gustafson, Jeff Hughes
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Algebra: Structure And Method, Book 1
Algebra
ISBN:
9780395977224
Author:
Richard G. Brown, Mary P. Dolciani, Robert H. Sorgenfrey, William L. Cole
Publisher:
McDougal Littell