A case-control study of patients on antihypertensive drugs related an increased risk of myocardial infarction (MI) for patients using calcium channel blockers. In this study, cases were antihypertensive drug patients who had suffered a first fatal or nonfatal MI through 1993, and controls were antihypertensive drug patients, matched by demographic factors, who had suffered a MI. Among the comparisons reported were patients receiving calcium channel (CC) blockers (with and without diuretics) and patients receiving ß-blockers (with and without diuretics). Results of numbers of patient by drug/MI status combination are given in the following table. Antihypertensive OHO: p1p2 vs. Ha: p1 < p2 O HO: p1> p2 vs. Ha: p1=p2 Drug Does it appear that an increased risk of myocardial infarction (MI) is related to using calcium channel (CC) blockers? The case-control nature of this study requires we compare the proportion of CC blocker users among those had MI attack (p1) vs. the proportion of CC blocker users among those had no MI (p2). What is your hypothesis for this test? O HO: p1p2 vs. Ha: p1=p2 CC blocker B-blocker O HO: p1=p2 vs. Ha: p1 > p2 Occurrence of Yes (cases) 80 85 Myocardial Infarction No (controls) 230 395
A case-control study of patients on antihypertensive drugs related an increased risk of myocardial infarction (MI) for patients using calcium channel blockers. In this study, cases were antihypertensive drug patients who had suffered a first fatal or nonfatal MI through 1993, and controls were antihypertensive drug patients, matched by demographic factors, who had suffered a MI. Among the comparisons reported were patients receiving calcium channel (CC) blockers (with and without diuretics) and patients receiving ß-blockers (with and without diuretics). Results of numbers of patient by drug/MI status combination are given in the following table. Antihypertensive OHO: p1p2 vs. Ha: p1 < p2 O HO: p1> p2 vs. Ha: p1=p2 Drug Does it appear that an increased risk of myocardial infarction (MI) is related to using calcium channel (CC) blockers? The case-control nature of this study requires we compare the proportion of CC blocker users among those had MI attack (p1) vs. the proportion of CC blocker users among those had no MI (p2). What is your hypothesis for this test? O HO: p1p2 vs. Ha: p1=p2 CC blocker B-blocker O HO: p1=p2 vs. Ha: p1 > p2 Occurrence of Yes (cases) 80 85 Myocardial Infarction No (controls) 230 395
Big Ideas Math A Bridge To Success Algebra 1: Student Edition 2015
1st Edition
ISBN:9781680331141
Author:HOUGHTON MIFFLIN HARCOURT
Publisher:HOUGHTON MIFFLIN HARCOURT
Chapter4: Writing Linear Equations
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 14CR
Related questions
Question
True or False? We have strong evidence against H0: p1 = p2 and support the claim that an increased risk of myocardial infarction (MI) is related to using calcium channel (CC) blockers.
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps
Recommended textbooks for you
Big Ideas Math A Bridge To Success Algebra 1: Stu…
Algebra
ISBN:
9781680331141
Author:
HOUGHTON MIFFLIN HARCOURT
Publisher:
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780079039897
Author:
Carter
Publisher:
McGraw Hill
College Algebra (MindTap Course List)
Algebra
ISBN:
9781305652231
Author:
R. David Gustafson, Jeff Hughes
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Big Ideas Math A Bridge To Success Algebra 1: Stu…
Algebra
ISBN:
9781680331141
Author:
HOUGHTON MIFFLIN HARCOURT
Publisher:
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780079039897
Author:
Carter
Publisher:
McGraw Hill
College Algebra (MindTap Course List)
Algebra
ISBN:
9781305652231
Author:
R. David Gustafson, Jeff Hughes
Publisher:
Cengage Learning