3) Amazon and Target both sell the new Xbox, and have a choice whether to charge a high price or a low price. The payoff matrix identifies the profit either store can expect to make (in millions of dollars). Walmart High Price Low Price High Price b. Identify the Nash Equilibrium. 3,6 5,5 Amazon Low Price 2,8 4,3 a. Identify the Dominant Strategy for either player, or write "none" if there isn't one,

3) Amazon and Target both sell the new Xbox, and have a choice whether to charge a high price or a low price. The payoff matrix identifies the profit either store can expect to make (in millions of dollars). Walmart High Price Low Price High Price b. Identify the Nash Equilibrium. 3,6 5,5 Amazon Low Price 2,8 4,3 a. Identify the Dominant Strategy for either player, or write "none" if there isn't one,

Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach

5th Edition

ISBN:9781337106665

Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor

Publisher:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor

Chapter15: Strategic Games

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 3MC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

7. Solving for dominant strategies and the Nash equilibrium Suppose Felix and Janet are playing a game in which both must simultaneously choose the action Left or Right. The payoff matrix that follows shows the payoff each person will earn as a function of both of their choices. For example, the lower-right cell shows that if Felix chooses Right and Janet chooses Right, Felix will receive a payoff of 7 and Janet will receive a payoff of 4. Felix Left Right Left 6,3 3,3 Janet Right 6,4 7,4 The only dominant strategy in this game is for to choose The outcome reflecting the unique Nash equilibrium in this game is as follows: Felix chooses and Janet chooses
7. Solving for dominant strategies and the Nash equilibrium Suppose Andrew and Beth are playing a game in which both must simultaneously choose the action Left or Right. The payoff matrix that follows shows the payoff each person will earn as a function of both of their choices. For example, the lower-right cell shows that if Andrew chooses Right and Beth chooses Right, Andrew will receive a payoff of 6 and Beth will receive a payoff of 5. Andrew Left Right Left 8,4 5,4 Beth Right 4,5 6,5 The only dominant strategy in this game is for to choose The outcome reflecting the unique Nash equilibrium in this game is as follows: Andrew chooses and Beth chooses
7. Solving for dominant strategies and the Nash equilibrium Suppose Dmitri and Frances are playing a game in which both must simultaneously choose the action Left or Right. The payoff matrix that follows shows the payoff each person will earn as a function of both of their choices. For example, the lower-right cell shows that if Dmitri chooses Right and Frances chooses Right, Dmitri will receive a payoff of 7 and Frances will receive a payoff of 6. Frances Left Right Left 4, 3 6, 4 Dmitri Right 6, 7 7, 6 to choose The only dominant strategy in this game is for and Frances chooses The outcome reflecting the unique Nash equilibrium in this game is as follows: Dmitri chooses v
7. Solving for dominant strategies and the Nash equilibrium Suppose Carlos and Deborah are playing a game in which both must simultaneously choose the action Left or Right. The payoff matrix that follows shows the payoff each person will earn as a function of both of their choices. For example, the lower-right cell shows that if Carlos chooses Right and Deborah chooses Right, Carlos will receive a payoff of 5 and Deborah will receive a payoff of 1. Carlos Deborah Left Left 4,4 Right 2,4 Right 6,7 5,1 The only dominant strategy in this game is for to choose The outcome reflecting the unique Nash equilibrium in this game is as follows: Carlos chooses and Deborah chooses
8. Solving for dominant strategies and the Nash equilibrium Suppose Tim and Alyssa are playing a game in which both must simultaneously choose the action Left or Right. The payoff matrix that follows shows the payoff each person will earn as a function of both of their choices. For example, the lower-right cell shows that if Tim chooses Right and Alyssa chooses Right, Tim will receive a payoff of 3 and Alyssa will receive a payoff of 6. Tim Left Left 5, 6 Right 4, 2 Alyssa Right 5,5 3,6 The only dominant strategy in this game is for to choose The outcome reflecting the unique Nash equilibrium in this game is as follows: Tim chooses and Alyssa chooses
Please look at the payoff matrix below which shows the benefits that would accrue to each player in a 2-player.non-sequential, non-repeated game. a) Identify the collusive (cooperative) equilibrium. b) Identify the secure strategy (maximin) equilibrium c) Identify the maximax equilibrium d) Identify the Nash equilibrium Apple Inc. Strategy 1 Strategy 2 Strategy 3 20 40 60 60 1000 200 Strategy A 70 50 90 Banana Inc. 400 70 300 Strategy B 40 80 100 90 150 80 Strategy C
7. Solving for dominant strategies and the Nash equilibrium Suppose Antonio and Caroline are playing a game in which both must simultaneously choose the action Left or Right. The payoff matrix that follows shows the payoff each person will earn as a function of both of their choices. For example, the lower-right cell shows that if Antonio chooses Right and Caroline chooses Right, Antonio will receive a payoff of 9 and Caroline will receive a payoff of 8. Caroline Left Right Left 8, 5 8. 7 Antonio Right 3, 6 9, 8 The only dominant strategy in this game is for to choose The outcome reflecting the unique Nash equilibrium in this game is as follows: Antonio chooses and Caroline chooses
3. Solving for dominant strategies and the Nash equilibrium Suppose Charles and Dina are playing a game in which both must simultaneously choose the action Left or Right. The payoff matrix that follows shows the payoff each person will earn as a function of both of their choices. For example, the lower-right cell shows that if Charles chooses Right and Dina chooses Right, Charles will receive a payoff of 3 and Dina will receive a payoff of 8. Dina Left Right Left 3,7 2,6 Charles Right 4,5 3,8 The only dominant strategy in this game is for to choose The outcome reflecting the unique Nash equilibrium in this game is as follows: Charles chooses and Dina chooses
7. Solving for dominant strategies and the Nash equilibrium Suppose Van and Amy are playing a game in which both must simultaneously choose the action Left or Right. The payoff matrix that follows shows the payoff each person will earn as a function of both of their choices. For example, the lower-right cell shows that if Van chooses Right and Amy chooses Right, Van will receive a payoff of 5 and Amy will receive a payoff of 4. Van Left Left 8,3 Right 5,3 Amy Right 4,4 5,4 The only dominant strategy in this game is for to choose The outcome reflecting the unique Nash equilibrium in this game is as follows: Van chooses and Amy chooses
7. Solving for dominant strategies and the Nash equilibrium Suppose Rashard and Alyssa are playing a game that requires both to simultaneously choose an action: Up or Down. The payoff matrix that follows shows the earnings of each person as a function of both of their choices. For example, the upper-right cell shows that if Rashard chooses Up and Alyssa chooses Down, Rashard will receive a payoff of 6 and Alyssa will receive a payoff of 8. Rashard Up Down Alyssa Up 4,6 7,5 Down 6,8 3,7 In this game, the only dominant strategy is for to choose The outcome reflecting the unique Nash equilibrium in this game is as follows: Rashard chooses and Alyssa chooses
3. For the friend-foe game, recall that there were 3 Nash equilibria possible, but the equilibria set didn't include the cooperative outcome, for which both players would win. Friend Foe Friend | 500,500 0,1000 Foe 1000,0 0,0 a) If the game is played repeatedly, propose a play strategy that will enforce cooperation. For what values of ô (discount factor) the equilibrium will be (Friend, Friend)?
2. Consider the following "location game." There are two ice cream sellers (Seller 1 and Seller 2) in a small city. Residents are uniformly located on a straight street of length 1. The ice cream sellers need to choose where to set up their carts, and each resident will purchase one unit of ice cream from the nearest seller. The city council has fixed the price of the ice cream, and as a result, each seller just wants sell as much ice cream as possible. (a) We think of this "location game" as a simultaneous-move game, in which each player's payoff is the proportion of residents that buy from her cart. Is this game with discrete strategies or continuous strategies? Please state the set of (pure) strategies for both sellers. Is this game zero-sum or non-zero-sum? (b) Find all NE(s) of this game. (c) Is there an alternative pair of locations for the sellers such that the residents’ total walking distance is reduced but neither seller is hurt? Is it an NE? (d) Suppose now that there are…