Why Are Body Cameras Important

The social media and the public might want police body cam footage release but sometimes it might be to graphic or controversial. Police body cameras have been a topic since the incident with Michael Brown in august of 2014. Police shot and killed an unarmed individual in ferguson, MO, leading to many people wanting cameras on police. Whether the cameras are a good idea or not this paper will explore the facts and sides of police body cameras. Overall body cameras should be required Because they can save the lives of the innocent, keep innocent people from going to jail, and can help a case as more evidence.

Across the country a growing number of legislative departments have been debating about the pros and cons of police body cameras. This paper will further explore benefits, as well as the downfalls of using such devices. This paper will also look at specific cases and examine whether or not body cameras were helpful in various situations. It will examine if they were a deterrent in cases dealing with police brutality and domestic violence. It also looks at how they could be misused and assisting some officers in covering up their corrupt behavior.

Within recent years there has been much controversy surrounding police officers and whether or not they should be wearing body cameras to document their everyday interactions with the public. While the use of body cameras may seem to invade the public or police privacy. Police-worn body cameras will be beneficial to law enforcement and civilians all over the world. Police must be equipped with body cameras to alleviate any doubt in the effectiveness of officers. Law enforcement worn body cameras would enhance the trust of the public by keeping both the officers and the citizens accountable for their actions, providing evidence, and helping protect them from false accusations, while protecting privacy

There is so much crime which occurs in our society today, which it is very difficult to put an end to it. But there is a thing which is common among these crimes which are the criminals. According to the article, "Police body Cams: Solution or scam? Nwanevu the author has stated many questions to which he gathers the responses from three panels who is Mariame Kaba a member of the Chicago antipolice violence organization, David Fleck a vice president and he is also a major manufacturer of the police body cameras, and Connor Boyack who is a president of Utah 's Liberates Institute. This article mentions the popular magazine such as Time magazine, this magazine reports that over a quarter of the country 's police departments are already testing or actively using cameras, including the NYPD and the LAPD (Nwanevu, 2015). Also the author Nwanevu states that The Obama administration has called for the federal funding to support the deployment of as many as 50,000 devices to state and local law enforcement agencies. The administration 's reasoning captures the perspective of most camera supporters. According to the status the usage by police officers will help sustain trust between law enforcement agencies and the communities they interact with (Nwanevu, 2015). Reformers have suggested that the video could have gone a long way towards resolving the ambiguities of the Michael Brown case where eyewitnesses had given conflicting stories and also the death of Eric Garner according to

To peep or not to peep, that is the question being asked by many regarding police body cameras in communities. The topic of police brutality is a rising issue in today’s society. Several questions have arose over the use of police body cameras and whether they are a good or bad idea. Police body cameras have has a variety of concern to many communities regarding their potential. Every city has a different trust and relationship for their police force and these concerns vary depending on the community. People have the concern regarding privacy, protection, and impact on the community and more. After researching the problems caused by Police body cameras as well as its background, the current state of the issue, and the potential solutions, it is clear that communities need to bring a solution to this situation.Such as laws, policies, rules, and more to control this new information.

First advantage in law enforcement agents wearing body cameras is to hold the officers accountable. “Holding the officers accountable, will ensure the officer adheres to policies and procedures during an encounter with victims and suspects.” Body-worn cameras are poised to help boost accountability for law enforcement and citizens and, unlike many new police technologies, the cameras share preliminary support from both law enforcement and social justice groups. Successful implementation of the cameras will require careful policies that respect and protect both the police and the public.

Today, law enforcement agencies, or more specifically police officers, are under constant scrutiny from their peers as well as outside sources. Many of these problems arise from how the police treat and deal with these citizens. There is however a solution to these problems, which can not only improve officer safety, but can also protect anyone else that the officer encounters. The solution to this problem is officer mounted camera systems, or better known as body cameras. These body cameras capture almost everything an officer see’s as well as hears. This allows for protection against a police officer as well as protection for a citizen who was scrutinized for something he or she might have done or not. Body cameras are ever increasing in policing and have many benefit’s as well as draw backs.

The most beneficial way to work with the community is by having body cameras. According to Issues and Controversies, President Obama said, “the safer it is for cops, the more effectively they can do their jobs, the more cooperation there’s going to be, the more likely those communities are to be safe” (Police Body Cameras). Due to, the power of authority police officers is mistreating and killing the civilian. As a result, the community feels unsafe and fears police officers. For this reason, implementing body cameras on police officers is crucial for safety, evidentiary purpose, and liability.

  Introduction The Issue Lately, mainstream media outlets have deeply covered recent officer involved shootings and use of force events by police. As a result, much of the public has latched onto the idea that police officers should be required to wear body cameras, which the public believes will somehow miraculously stop any excessive use of force by police. Are police body cameras really the answer, or is this our “human tendency, in times of tragedy, to latch on to the

A developing number of state and province authoritative offices over the United States have been debating the advantages and disadvantages to police body cameras and whether they ought to end up a portion of the standard law implementation officer's uniform. Earlier police divisions were using cameras before the big change. Rialto, California police department has been wearing body-mounted cameras that record everything that happens in the middle of cops and civilians. Police officers have gotten above the law and are now able to abuse their powers as they wish, this truth is to be extremely terrifying. Especially being an African American male in today’s society and see these acts of deadly force being posted on social media affects me every

The author emphasizes the importance of video footage and the objectivity it offers. Body-cameras not only assist police, but also helped vindicate officers and law-abiding citizens. Brucato explored the cause and effect regarding the absence of police video compared to civilian sousveillance video of past police incidents. Today’s ubiquitous cell phone surveillance hungry society warrants police ascertain body-cameras as soon as possible. For example: In 1991, news media outlets around the world broadcasted footage of several white police officers from the Los Angeles Police Department beat African American motorist Rodney King during a traffic stop. The video damaged the trust and reputation of police departments across the

Body cameras give more wide imaging than just having patrol car cameras. (“ 4 reasons…”) Having two sources to catch everything on cameras are a better suggestion. Cameras can't go away from the patrol car like body cameras can. The body cameras are attached to the officers at all time, and are running at all times. You don't have to every time you are in a sticky situation to worry about turning your cameras on. Patrol cameras don't always point to the

It is said that once a police-citizen interaction occurs, where they are both aware that they are being filmed, they will try to put on their best behavior. One of the key findings from a study published in the Journal of Experimental Criminology is that officers who did not wear body-worn cameras conducted both more arrest and more “stop and frisks” than officers who did wear the body-worn cameras (Kelsh, 2016). This indicates that officers are more cautious and risk averse when wearing body-worn cameras, this due to the fact that they thought more carefully about criminal policy and

New York Police Department was accelerating its efforts to outfit nearly every patrol officer on the force with body cameras” (Santora and Stewart). While crime has always been a problem for a major metropolitan center like New York City, it is rare to see that the new measures in crime prevention involve protecting civilians from the very people hired to guard their safety. This new measure in crime fighting technology, which require each police officer to wear a body camera to record their interactions with civilians, has gained much weight in the recent news due the headline making events such as the riots in Ferguson, Missouri. To combat the growing public’s growing distrust of the law enforcement authorities, “Mr. de Blasio said the cameras would provide a sense of accountability and transparency” (Santora and Stewart).

The use of body worn cameras for law enforcement officers has been a growing demand for the public, especially after a recent case in the shooting of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri. This case has sparked an increasing concern of police brutality and use of force.