What Other Ideas Have You Encountered In A Class Or Elsewhere That Might Be Pertinent?

Keohane (2012) believes education is important because the “most valuable and attractive people we know are those who have rich and fascinating intellectual furniture in those spaces rather than a void between their ears” (Keohane, 2012). Keohane (2012) argues that the most exceptional people are those that are educated in many fields and are a fountain of facts. On the contrary, Friedman argues that the people that didn’t receive education and still succeeded in the world are those that are truly exceptional (Friedman, 2014). Unlike Keohane (2012), Friedman (2014) prioritizes talent rather than a lifetime of education, because those with talent are more likely to succeed.

In “Blue Collar Brilliance,” the author, Mike Rose, challenges the assertion that intelligence and ability is measured by the amount of education one completes through his personal experiences, observations, and beliefs. In doing so, Rose suggests that blue collar workers actually require more intellect than assumed.

Many people consider book smart the only form of intelligence, but a lot of people who attended college and obtained a degree can’t perform a basic task of changing a flat tire. So does that make those people unintelligent? Mike Rose explains in “Blue Collar Brilliance” and Gerald Graff explains in “Hidden Intellectualism” that there are many different forms of intelligence. In Rose’s article, he explains how he observed his mother along with other family members work blue-collar jobs. He explains how everyone involved with blue collared work develops a sense of intelligence in many different forms. In Graff’s article, he explains how schools and colleges are doing a poor job at getting the full potential out of students. Graff thinks that if we give students things they like to read then they will progress to more scholarly readings. Both authors describe how society doesn’t value all types of intellectualism. Rose explains how people are stereotyping blue-collared jobs and not appreciating them. Graff explains how schools and colleges aren’t fostering intellectualism because they don’t take interests into account.

Mike Rose argument was different in terms of content and the evidence he used. Rose is trying to explain that our culture has a series of assumption towards intelligence. We assume “intelligence is closely associated with formal education- the type of schooling a person has”. People now believe that work requiring less schooling requires less intelligence. He’s saying this assumption is wrong. He uses anecdotes from his personal experiences and historical stories about his family accomplishments has evidence to clarify and support his argument. I think his argument his convincing based on the way he use step by step examples to describe how each family member didn’t have much schooling to being successful. For instance; his mom was only a waitress, but during her work experience she solved both technical problems and human problems very well. Joe was a foreman who learnt more and more about the auto industry (the machinery and production process). With further promotion has a supervisor he solved more problems and also found more problems to solve. Overall, many kinds of physical work don’t require a high literacy level, but it requires much reading. Workers may lack formal education or knowledge, but they are not less intelligence. These workers gain hands on knowledge through direct experience which made

Most people believe that the only way to be intelligent is to go to school and earn a degree. It is also believed a person who may not have gone to school or paid much attention whilst in school may not be as smart as someone who has. There are many people who did not have the privilege of going to school or maybe they did not want to be in school and dropped out. These people probably started working at a younger age than most people. These kinds of people are discussed in Gerald Graff’s “Hidden Intellectualism” and Mike Rose’s “Blue-Collar Brilliance”. These people are known as blue collar workers.Although, white collar jobs require a degree and intelligence blue collar workers are just as if not more intelligent than white collar workers because they are street smart rather than book smart , have more experience, and have good social skills.

Identify the rebuttal and highlight it [blue]. Is there a transition (e.g., however…) that signals the shift back to the writer’s argument? Is the rebuttal supported with evidence and warrants? Make note of missing elements.

In the United States, there has been, and always will be a debate on education.While some feel it is very important and crucial to success, others feel it is unessential to our happiness and well being. Many assume that education and success are directly associated with intellectualism. In this essay, I will review the current trend in research on intellectualism, which many feel is to enforce pursuing a higher education, due to a common belief among the American people that those who do not receive a higher education are seemingly less intelligent. Research on this topic increasingly suggests that those who receive a higher education, tend to make more money, rating them as more successful in the eyes of

In the article, "Blue Collar Brilliance" Mark Rose shows his thought that hands on employments shouldn't be seen as foolish. Society characterizes knowledge in view of grades and IQ tests, however numbers doesn't characterize the workers in the fields. Rose points out that his mom's employment as a waitress and his uncle's occupation in the paint-and-body office are two individuals with a less education is skillful in their job by gaining hand-on experience and knowledge.

In conclusion, I agree with Mike Roses' Essay “Blue Collar Brilliance” because in my own personal life experiences I have seen first hand that you do not have to be well educated to be intelligent. My spouse works as a garbage man and at first glance you would never know how intelligent he is just by his profession, but he is very skilled from everything to troubleshooting mechanical equipment to carrying on philosophical conversations and religious

Academic work should not define intelligence nor should a job define ability; a person, regardless of grades, degrees, or job title, is an intellect. Together, Gerald Graff, a coauthor of They Say I say, professor, and former anti-intellect, author of "Hidden Intellectualism," and Mike Rose, professor, author, and in depth thinker, author of "Blue-Collar Brilliance," share two different perspectives on what an intellect truly is. Yet, both writings hold meaningful points and experiences to prove who qualifies to be an intellect. Society continuously focuses on what leads to a successful and rounded life: go to school, graduate, go back to school, get a degree, and then a job. It is believed that these high expectations of higher academics enables one to be more successful is correct; however, it is not. It is a person’s individual goals that give them the success they wish to have whether that be education, volunteering, or donating. Also, street smarts is not to be overlooked; a person with common sense can know more than a Doctor. Typically, a person can have either common sense or intelligence, not both. Street smarts is, without a doubt, a superior quality to possess as it encompasses more in life than just a degree does. For example, it is more appropriate to know how to cross a street properly in life than know how to perform a craniotomy. Furthermore, one does not gain knowledge and life lessons through school alone, but through experience,

Many people in today’s society tend to believe that a good education is the fastest way to move up the ladder in their chosen. People believe that those who seek further education at a college or university are more intelligent. Indeed, a college education is a basic requirement for many white collar, and some blue collar, jobs. In an effort to persuade his audience that intelligence cannot be measured by the amount of education a person has Mike Rose wrote an article entitled “Blue Collar Brilliance”. The article that appeared in the American Scholar, a quarterly literary magazine of the Phi Beta Kappa Society, established in 1932. The American Scholar audience includes, Company’s , Employees,

Over many centuries, society tends to frame the obscene differences to antagonize and alienate each other whether it's about a political or religious view, social reasons, or financial situations. In “Blue Collar Brilliance”, Mike Rose provides an invigorating story to persuade his audience to understand that having a blue collar job compared to a white-collar job does not determine how smart someone is. Rose uses anecdotes, rhetorical question, and logos to show that blue-collar workers learn just as much without a formal education.

What does it mean to be well educated? To be well educated it is a balance between academics and practical knowledge. Throughout this paper I will show that one does not necessarily need a college degree to be deemed as well educated. I will explore both aspects of academics and practical knowledge and how it affects individuals.

He is saying a person who has a total of education is intelligence but should still be more intelligence with a job to and understand both the body and brain. Then he talks about his mom was a waitress and how she had to remember where the order went to. Tells people who are reading about this story of the different things going on in blue collar jobs and his life. His uncle started working for General Motors. Joe talks about the intelligence he had learn when working on the assembly line. The evidence he gives is making sure to write notes, read and integral. I agree with him because even if that person has enough schooling still does not mean anything about their intelligence. Now of days’ people cannot pay for going to a University but

Everyone has an opinion concerning what type of education is most useful. We all know that a college education is important in the competitive world we live in today. For instance, if you want a career in engineering, medicine, chemistry or law, a bachelor's degree or higher is mandatory. We often see people who have made it really big, and yet have little or no formal education. My opinion is, in order to get and keep a good paying job, you need both “street smarts” and “book smarts.” The combination of practical knowledge and explicit knowledge is the key to a successful career. Both types of knowledge have distinct advantages.