preview

What Is The Difference In The Development Of PICC?

Decent Essays

The researchers’ goal was to compare an antimicrobial PICC line impregnated with CHG with a non-CHG-impregnated PICC line with the development of CLASBI or VTE development among the three-high risk patient population that included immune suppressed, trauma and critical care patients. The overall conclusion shows that there is no significant difference with the use of the two types of PICC in the development of CLASBI or VTE. Statistics does support that increased catheter size impacts VTE formation and those PICC lines that were impregnated with HCG did result in more post insertion bleeding. One conclusion supports that the actual care of the PICC line more so than the type of PICC line used may impact development of CLASBI. The limited …show more content…

Demographic information as well as information about the research process was collected through consent forms obtained from patients. Patient education regarding the treatment, interventions, procedures as well as potential risks associated with these procedures clearly disclosed and patients can participate voluntarily as evidenced by signature on an informed consent form. A4. Strengths and Limitations Strengths were identified in this study that included use of specific population at highest risk of development of CLASBI and VTE, including immunosuppression, trauma and critical care population, the use of the designated IV team for placement, daily assessment and dressing management of the PICC lines was an additional strength, maintaining limited variation of procedural technique. To decrease bias, randomization was conducted by a third party and this research is noted to be the first RCT examination of the effects of CHG impregnated versus non-HCG impregnated PICC lines. Verification of CLASBI infection through one infection prevention specialist dedicated to this study for improved inter-rater reliability. Limitations to this study included the sample size. The study concluded after 18 months. This study resulted in a power of 48.9% based upon post study power analysis. A study with a population of 348, 174 in each group would be required for sufficient power. An additional limit is the inability to blind the study due to

Get Access