preview

Wa'ahila Ridge; percent cover versus elevation for Megathyrsus maximus and Senna surattensis

Good Essays

Travis Weaver
Biology 265L
Lauren Van Heukalem
Section No. 1
December 1st, 2014

Wa’ahila Ridge: Percent Cover of Megathyrus maximus and Senna surattensis and its relation to Elevation Abstract
Percent cover of both Megathyrus maximus and Senna surattensis is estimated using quadrats on 11 separate plots along Wa’ahila Ridge. Percent cover of these two plant species were compared to the measured elevation using a GPS, in each plot. A p-value greater than .005 for each indicates a lack of significance between elevation and percent cover. A correlation analysis was used to determine that there is no significance between the elevation and percent cover as M. maximus had a p-value of .873 and S. surattensis had a p-value of .380. Sample size …show more content…

maximus and S. surattensis at varying elevations. Percent cover is often used to determine the coverage of a particular species; in this case it is used to determine the cover of Guinea grass and Kolomano on the different plots. Based on observations from several ridge hikes, a hypothesis had been drawn up, and stated that: As elevation increases, so does percent cover of M. maximus and S. surrattensis. M. maximus is a good species to test because of it’s high abundance, particularly on the ridge. Kolomano is also a readily available on the ridge and is easily visible due to its flowers. By collecting measurements of percent cover at each of the 11 plots, the hypothesis could be supported or refuted.

Materials and Methods
Data collection consisted of several measurements at each of the 11 plots on Wa’ahila ridge. Data was collected by the various lab sections of Biology 265 on September 16th and 23rd, as well as October 14th. Quadrats and transects were laid out in the four sections of each plot, sticky traps and pitfalls were also set up to sample insect populations. Soil moisture and pH, air speed, elevation, and light intensity were all measure at each plot as well. Using the quadrats, percent cover of both M. maximus and S. surrattensis was estimated by determining how much area the plant covered in a three-dimensional area marked by the edges of the quadrat. This data was collected at each plot so that

Get Access